HAARP and Earthquakes

[kompili]

I am not just one sided, I like looking at all the facts, even if they are fiction.

[Fancy]

I am not just one sided, I like looking at all the facts, even if they are fiction.

You might try and rephrase that - oxymoron isn't it?

[kompili]

Facts to you people who will believe anything, but only fiction to me.

[Fancy]

Facts to you people who will believe anything, but only fiction to me.

Now now, facts are facts and "you people" is a little broad. You do know HAARP is a real organization right? And opinions as you have been posting to back up what you believe is getting a little confusing if you read back. The papers by scientists I wouldn't say are fiction but that's up to you. There doesn't seem to be much in the way of relating HAARP to earthquakes so I think people are jumping to conclusions needlessly. If you have read anything that might be of value, please do not hesitate to post it here - just refrain from the blogs and opinionated pieces that have nothing to support them.

[goatboy]

Facts to you people who will believe anything, but only fiction to me.

So you're willing to believe that the energy detected was HAARP, even though there is not one shred of evidence that ACTUALLY points to it? Even if you believe that HAARP MAY be capable of that kind of energy release (which I don't think it does), there is still not one piece of evidence that the energy detected in Japan was from HAARP. Just because you don't believe it was one thing (siesmic activity), doesn't automatically make the other (HAARP) the cause. You have to PROVE that HAARP was the cause, not just a reason that nothing else could have cause it. That statement means you think you know everything.

[kompili]

You do know HAARP is a real organization right?

I was the one who told you . And how many people didn't believe it.

[Fancy]

No, kompili, you didn't tell me about HAARP - you did say this though:

New NASA research points to possible HAARP connection in Japan earthquake, tsunami

and I know that isn't true.

[kompili]

A course NASA wouldn't say that, NASA is part of the cover up. You must have misunderstood be.

[Fancy]

A course NASA wouldn't say that, NASA is part of the cover up. You must have misunderstood be.

Nope, what you posted was clear. Incidentally, CB_Brooklyn spoke about HAARP a few years back and of course HAARP has been around a long time - since 1990.

[kompili]

Right around when the chemtrails started, I see, good find.

[goatboy]

Right around when the chemtrails started, I see, good find.

And, coincidentally, when the Internet was born.

[kompili]

Yes, we didn;t have to take the word of the main stream media any more.

[goatboy]

Yes, we didn;t have to take the word of the main stream media any more.

and it was much easier to find a ton of miss-information and pseudo science and pass that off as the truth. You say we're the gullible ones and we say you are. One of us is right and we'll probably never convince the other otherwise.

[kompili]

and it was much easier to find a ton of miss-information and pseudo science and pass that off as the truth. You say we're the gullible ones and we say you are. One of us is right and we'll probably never convince the other otherwise.

Miss-information goes both ways. After much research, I make my decision, not before, or what the media tells me.

[Fancy]

Right around when the chemtrails started, I see, good find.

Good find? It was on the website that was posted earlier - I actually read quite a bit of it.