False Flag

[maryjane48]

lets see your proof its false . you can say what you want but facts are a theory is being put forth with data to back it up . what you got ? besides scripted media outlets

[Donald G]

Postby FreeRights » Today, 12:53 pm

Lol More theories without facts.

That is found on all strings but seems particularly evident on this thread. Even when true facts appear they are accompanied by false conclusions that are in no way supported by the facts given.

[FreeRights]

lets see your proof its false . you can say what you want but facts are a theory is being put forth with data to back it up . what you got ? besides scripted media outlets

Let me guess. Globalresearch is going to classify as a legitimate news source, is that right?

It's not on me to prove that it's false, that burden is on them.

[maryjane48]

why is the burden on them ? because you say so ? nobody believed nixon was up to no good until few people put their reps on the line and said what they said . one the leading zionists
was dating a nazis sister even while the holocost had started but who is reporting on that ? just because your brain th8nks a certain way on certain issues doesnt mean thats how it is .


people like you say well how could they get away with it . but what you should ask yourself if im wrong , they did get away with it .

[goatboy]

The biggest problem with Global Research and all you conspiracy nuts is that you think EVERYTHING is a conspiracy. You point to a couple fairly benign historical events and say "look, this was true and nobody believed them" as though that is evidence that any future event is a conspiracy. Are there conspiracies happening in the world? Of course there is. Are they as elaborate as all the ones you guys latch onto. Not a chance. There is absolutely no way these type of large scale events are continually and systematically orchestrated. Just look at this forum, every major event in the world has been labeled a "false flag". Even one of them being a false flag is unlikely, but you're convinced they all are. Just because your brain thinks a certain way doesn't mean that's how it is.

[maryjane48]

lol thats not rebuttal .why cant they get away with it ? the plans for dday were kept secret up until the day it happened .yet hundreds if not thousands knew about it . you underestamate humans

[goatboy]

lol thats not rebuttal .why cant they get away with it ? the plans for dday were kept secret up until the day it happened .yet hundreds if not thousands knew about it . you underestamate humans

Thanks for making my point about using past events to justify your current position. Keeping a secret in war time is completely different than staging fake attacks broadcast to millions of people.

Do you believe Sandy Hook happened and all those kids were killed?
What about the Boston Marathon bombing, do you think that was all fake?
I know you think 9-11 was an inside job.
Paris and Brussels shootings? Charlie Hebdo? San Bernadino? Do you think those were all fake?

[maryjane48]

it doesnt matter what anyone thinks of those events . what does matter is if this . have the powerfull in the past manipulated events to their own gain and if so , why wouldnt they do it now . theres no country that you could say is free in the literal sense . so we are being controled in our everyday lives already on a subtle scale so why not also on large scale population ? ask yourself if you think everything plays out naturaly or are events planned to certain degree .

[Ranger66]

“the plans for dday were kept secret up until the day it happened”

Totally incorrect, everyone on both sides of the channel knew an invasion was coming.

[peaceseeker]

The false flag attack against Cuba - A serious plan hatched by the Pentagon
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/assa ... HMO6q.dpuf



Only stopped when White House said: "No way"

"False flag" means carrying out a terrorist act and blaming in on another party.

In the early 60s, the Pentagon crafted a plan to blow a US passenger plane out of the sky and blame it on the Cubans government to justify an invasion and take over of the country. It was called "Operation Northwoods."

It was only rejected when it reached the White House. Otherwise, the military was 100% ready act act on it.

The coincidence of yet another high profile terrorist act in Europe at the very same time that Obama was in Cuba brought this dark reality of American history to mind.

Are there "official" forces who would, in order to advance their own agenda, bomb Belgium civilians and blame it on "Middle Eastern terrorists"?

History says: Yes.

- See more at: http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/assa ... HMO6q.dpuf

[peaceseeker]

Problem. Reaction. Solution. (Brussels Edition)
Corbett • 03/28/2016
https://www.corbettreport.com/problem-r ... +Report%29



The dust has barely settled on the site of the Brussels bomb blasts and already the EUreaucrats are salivating about the prospect of a pan-European intelligence agency. Join James for today’s Thought for the Day as he explains the latest example of how the authoritarians take more control after every major terror event.

SHOW NOTES
Problem. Reaction. Solution. (Paris Edition)

French MPs vote to extend state of emergency after Paris attack

Hollande wants constitution changes, more security spending

Police cuts: Terror response warning to home secretary

New calls for EU army in wake of Paris terror attacks

As Terrorists Cross Borders, Europe Sees Anew That Its Intelligence Does Not

We need a pan-European FBI to counter terror threat – ex-Brussels region chief

When False Flags Don’t Fly

[maryjane48]

“the plans for dday were kept secret up until the day it happened”

Totally incorrect, everyone on both sides of the channel knew an invasion was coming.

lol maybe in star treks world , so why did the germans put what they had at the wrong place ?

http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2014 ... ecret.html

[FreeRights]

lol maybe in star treks world , so why did the germans put what they had at the wrong place ?

http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2014 ... ecret.html

Effective counter intelligence is the right answer.

The Allies couldn't keep the Normandy Invasion a secret and that's even before cellphones or worldwide internet access. Though you love using historical events in your favour, you greatly missed the mark on this one.

[goatboy]

so we are being controled in our everyday lives already on a subtle scale so why not also on large scale population ?

That is such illogical reasoning. Just because a cup of water is wet doesn't mean it would fill a swimming pool.

[Ranger66]

"The Invasion Site: Keeping Hitler Guessing
The main objective of Allied deception strategy was to convince the Germans that an invasion would indeed take place, but not at Normandy. The most obvious choice for an invasion site was Calais, located at the narrowest part of the English Channel, only 22 miles from Great Britain. Hitler was almost certain that the Allies would attack here. The Allies encouraged Hitler's belief by employing an ingenious ruse. Throughout southeastern England they built phony armies, complete with dummy planes, ships, tanks, and jeeps. With the help of British and American motion picture crews, they created entire army bases that would look authentic to German reconnaissance aircraft. These "bases" gave the impression of a massive Allied buildup in preparation for an invasion of France at Calais.

The ruse worked. Hitler ordered a heavy concentration of troops and artillery in the Pas-de-Calais region. In doing so, he left Normandy with fewer defenders."


Good work on your research.