Geoengineering
- Bejvas
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Dec 13th, 2009, 12:38 pm
Geoengineering
Let's try to have a more serious exchange of ideas about the manipulation of weather and earth. This includes chemtrails, since I believe it is one of the number one agents of the manipulation.
We don't know for sure who, how, why, but there are some facts that can help us get to some conclusions.
Here is a good article
http://www.rtcc.org/2014/11/17/geoengineering-pumping-iron-into-oceans-could-backfire/
We don't know for sure who, how, why, but there are some facts that can help us get to some conclusions.
Here is a good article
http://www.rtcc.org/2014/11/17/geoengineering-pumping-iron-into-oceans-could-backfire/
Geoengineering: Pumping iron into oceans could backfire - See more at: http://www.rtcc.org/2014/11/17/geoengin ... X0g3w.dpuf
"Just because you're angry, it doesn't mean you have the right to be cruel."
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: Feb 12th, 2011, 1:56 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
If you want to have a serious discussion about geo-engineering than I suggest you refrain from posting your beliefs that have no evidence to back them up - i.e: "chemtrails"
My suggestion would be limiting this discussion to documented facts and ideas.
My suggestion would be limiting this discussion to documented facts and ideas.
Nobody wants to hear your opinion. They just want to hear their own opinion coming out of your mouth.
- Fancy
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 72265
- Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
A serious discussion about geoengineering wouldn't be in the conspiracy forums - would it?
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
- zzontar
- Guru
- Posts: 8868
- Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
Dizzy1 wrote:If you want to have a serious discussion about geo-engineering than I suggest you refrain from posting your beliefs that have no evidence to back them up - i.e: "chemtrails"
My suggestion would be limiting this discussion to documented facts and ideas.
Using chemtrails to combat global warming is one of the ideas they have. That's a fact that's documented.
They say you can't believe everything they say.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9476
- Joined: Apr 3rd, 2008, 9:22 am
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
Using aluminum in the stratosphere is an idea they have. Chemtrails is a conspiracy theory stating that they are spraying chemicals for some reason (which some theories claim is for geoengineering).
Health forum: Health, well-being, medicine, aging, digital currency enslavement, depopulation conspiracy.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
- zzontar
- Guru
- Posts: 8868
- Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
LordEd wrote:Using aluminum in the stratosphere is an idea they have.
If they implemented that idea, would they use contrails or chemtrails?
They say you can't believe everything they say.
- Fancy
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 72265
- Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
zzontar wrote:If they implemented that idea, would they use contrails or chemtrails?
I would expect a separate dispersal system as in cloud seeding or crop dusting. Leave the exhaust system alone.
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policie ... trails.pdf
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
- zzontar
- Guru
- Posts: 8868
- Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
Fancy wrote:I would expect a separate dispersal system as in cloud seeding or crop dusting. Leave the exhaust system alone.
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policie ... trails.pdf
What, you're not going to answer the question? lol In case you haven't figured it out, if they plan on leaving a trail of chemicals, those would be chemtrails.
They say you can't believe everything they say.
- zzontar
- Guru
- Posts: 8868
- Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
I have no idea why this is even in the conspiracy forum as geo-engineering is not a conspiracy unless there's a hidden agenda. Type "hidden agenda" in Castanet's search and the vast majority of topics that come up won't be considered conspiracy theories. Weird.
They say you can't believe everything they say.
- Fancy
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 72265
- Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
Chemtrails are nefarious spraying thought up by who knows who using a plane's exhaust system (all the photos so far point to that).
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
- Fancy
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 72265
- Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
zzontar wrote:I have no idea why this is even in the conspiracy forum as geo-engineering is not a conspiracy unless there's a hidden agenda.
I already made a point about that.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
- zzontar
- Guru
- Posts: 8868
- Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
If they're going to spray aluminum into the atmosphere, they will leave chemtrails.
They say you can't believe everything they say.
- Fancy
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 72265
- Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
Then why the stupid question about contrails?
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10550
- Joined: May 29th, 2008, 6:12 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
A basic fact about using aircraft to spread substances into the air, is that since ww2 governments have had drones, why on earth would they use passenger aircraft? You can build a drone, in complete privacy for far less than modifying a commercial aircraft.
The conspiracy twits need to think.
The conspiracy twits need to think.
We're lost but we're making good time.
- zzontar
- Guru
- Posts: 8868
- Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Serious discussion about Geoengineering
Nibs wrote:A basic fact about using aircraft to spread substances into the air, is that since ww2 governments have had drones, why on earth would they use passenger aircraft? You can build a drone, in complete privacy for far less than modifying a commercial aircraft.
The conspiracy twits need to think.
It's scientists who came up with the idea, perhaps you should enlighten them with your broad knowledge. BTW, how much aerosol could a drone carry in comparison to a passenger jet?
They say you can't believe everything they say.