Fire Rips Through Home in Lake Country

[LordEd]

Reading between the lines tho, I'll bet the OP might not like those new smart meters?
Maybe that's why all the angst regarding said curiosity?
Hope this helps.

The topic is stated as a particular fire, but the slant was smart meter fire. The first post states 'another smart meter fire', "safe" in quotation marks to imply the opposite, and contractors doing a poor job.

None of these points are accepted as fact or common knowledge beyond the smart meter/conspiracy community but to contest these points does not belong in this thread. It would involve bringing up other reported cases which would be long and involved.

There are other threads related to smart meters, which at least some have been banished to the private conspiracy forum, where I should never venture.

So without arguing any of those points, let the thread die with dignity unless the fire chief comes back with a new statement.

The cause at last video was starting in the motor home and spreading to the structure.

[RVThereYet]

Reading between the lines tho, I'll bet the OP might not like those new smart meters?
Maybe that's why all the angst regarding said curiosity?
Hope this helps.

The topic is stated as a particular fire, but the slant was smart meter fire. The first post states 'another smart meter fire', "safe" in quotation marks to imply the opposite, and contractors doing a poor job.

None of these points are accepted as fact or common knowledge beyond the smart meter/conspiracy community but to contest these points does not belong in this thread. It would involve bringing up other reported cases which would be long and involved.

There are other threads related to smart meters, which at least some have been banished to the private conspiracy forum, where I should never venture.

So without arguing any of those points, let the thread die with dignity unless the fire chief comes back with a new statement.

The cause at last video was starting in the motor home and spreading to the structure.

10/10!

[Dizzy1]

Dizzy, I didn't think the point of the OP was all that evasive?
They were curious if the fire might have been started by a new hydro meter installation? OR...
They clearly stated that curiosity.

Reading between the lines tho, I'll bet the OP might not like those new smart meters?
Maybe that's why all the angst regarding said curiosity?
Hope this helps.

If you're on these boards long enough, you get to know certain peoples posting habits, so no your post didn't help nor is any help required but I do appreciate the thought ;)

[Dizzy1]

So without arguing any of those points, let the thread die with dignity unless the fire chief comes back with a new statement.

Agreed.

[sanfish]

Agreed ( without arguing any of your misrepresentations of my original post)!

[RVThereYet]

http://www.castanet.net/edition/news-st ... htm#112942

Turns out to be arson.

[LANDM]

That was apparently evident right away. See my post on the 9th....it was pretty obvious from the places that were burnt from what I heard.

[sanfish]

Well there we go then! See, the fire didnt start IN the motor home as originally reported. Thanks for posting that!

[RVThereYet]

Well there we go then! See, the fire didnt start IN the motor home as originally reported. Thanks for posting that!

The article didn't say that the fire did not start in the motorhome, nor did it say that it started in the house or even where it started for that matter, it simple said it was arson without mention of where it was started... so, the alleged arsonist could have set fire to the coach or the house or even both... maybe we'll find out if they make an arrest or release further finding with regard to this information.

[sanfish]

^^^^^ would have to be a terrible parking job because the updated story had reported origin as near front of motor home and corner of garage. Anyway , thank you for posting the link staying accelerant was used ( pointing to arson). As far as I'm concerned my question has been answered so no further need to post.

[Rwede]

Darn it all! Another well-functioning smart meter that can't be blamed for a fire.

[RVThereYet]

Smart Meters are hazardous ...

[sanfish]

^^^^^^^ oh you funny guys! Seeing as how cause has been determined, I won't be needing to read not post on this thread anymore. Thanks again for sharing that link. Hope they catch the arsonist yet.

I will leave you with this/these thought(s) though.

1. There are still many documented cases of fires being attributed to something with the smart meters ( whether that be install or meters themselves). What percentage exactly to number installed matters not to the person whose house burns down due to such an "intelligent" meter.

2. It remains a colossal waste of money to change all meters at once when many still had 30-50 years of life left in them ( read planned obsolescence ).

3. There are many intelligent people who say the testing is flawed and they are much more potentially dangerous to our health than we are being told. Now I don't know how true this is ( and neither do you regardless how much you believe you do not how many links you provide ) as not enough testing has been done.

You know I find the official hypocrisy baffling. On the one hand, 10,000 years usage ( and countless studies) on the benefits/benign nature of MJ and our govts ( or their puppet masters) still wish to spend BILLIONS studying the "long term effects" of a natural plant . On the other hand, they ( or their puppet masters) want to spend BILLIONS now ( unneeded with many meters having 30-50 years life left) with not nearly enough testing done.

3. These meters were/are never about improving our lives with a natural resource we own, but rather to improve their bottom line. So regardless any other argument for or against them, I'll still gladly pay the "opt out fee" to keep someone employed rather than save a little to improve some bozo's bottom line.

[Rwede]

*removed*

[maryjane48]

*removed*