Fire Danger Rating

The hot spot for fire-related discussions.
profirefighter
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Jul 19th, 2009, 12:04 am

Re: Fire Danger Rating

Post by profirefighter »

Good morning all...couple of minor points of clarification on cooldude posts....

The Wildfire Management Branch has over 200 weather stations across the province that we use for predicting fire beahviour and fire danger.

AS far as interpteting the indices generated by these stations....

FFMC (Fine Fuel Moisture Code) represents needles,twigs, grass etc that is extremely sensitive to daily weather changes. It expresses ease of igntion and fuel flamability.

FFMC <77 Generally a fire will not start without a concerted effort
77 to 86 Approx. 50% of igntion sources will start fires
>86 Easy igntion of fuels
> 94 100% of ignition sources will ignite forest fuels.

DMC (Duff MOisture code) represents the duff layer (2 to 4 inches deep) expresses consumption of mid depth fuel layers and medium sized woody debris.

DMC <35 Do not expect a great deal of involvement in this layer..Above this level one can expect more intense fires.


DC (Drought Code) Moisture content of deep (5 to 10 inch) duff. Expresse4s seasonal drought on forest fuels and hte amount of smouldering tha twill occur in deep duff and large logs.

DC 0 to 300 Very little involvement
300 to 450 Increased involvement with fires becoming more intense and mop-up problems occurring.
500+ Extensive involvement of the fuel layer. Fires are intense with difficult mop up problems, due depth of hte fires

So there is our forest fire danger rating interpretation lesson for the day :sunshine:

You can not just look at one of the indices and come up with a danger rating, there is more to it than that....

Hope you find this information helpful....
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
Posts: 9266
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 9:32 am

Re: Fire Danger Rating

Post by Frisk »

Thanks for sharing, profirefighter! I was wondering how it all worked.
profirefighter
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Jul 19th, 2009, 12:04 am

Re: Fire Danger Rating

Post by profirefighter »

Here is a link if you wish to do more reading....

http://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/en_CA/back ... ummary/fdr
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
Posts: 9266
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 9:32 am

Re: Fire Danger Rating

Post by Frisk »

Danger map today. What a crazy jump for the Kamloops center, eh? The forecast is all sun for the next 7 days, I would not be suprised if the Kamloops center is all orange and red by August 3rd.
Attachments
July 30th.gif
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
Posts: 9266
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 9:32 am

Re: Fire Danger Rating

Post by Frisk »

Today is B.C's highest danger rating this year.
Attachments
August 8th.gif
User avatar
Glacier
The Pilgrim
Posts: 40456
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: Fire Danger Rating

Post by Glacier »

Here is how this "low fire season" compares to the previous two years (for Sept 7). Clicking the pictures makes it easier to view them...

2009
2009
2010
2010
2011
2011
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
Posts: 9266
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 9:32 am

Re: Fire Danger Rating

Post by Frisk »

It's amazing when you compare all the maps. Normally the fire season should be coming to a end by now, not this year.
Locked

Return to “2011 Fire Watch”