Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Civilized, with a Bickering Room for those who aren't.
Locked
User avatar
GrooveTunes
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2041
Joined: Feb 19th, 2006, 7:37 pm

Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by GrooveTunes »

http://westcoastnativenews.com/the-canadian-court-case-mainstream-media-will-not-cover/



The Bank of Canada, unlike the Federal Reserve in the U.S., is wholly owned by the people of Canada. It was nationalized in 1938 and was used very successfully to fund infrastructure, social programs, education, etc, for the benefit of all Canadians. It was used to bring us out of the depression, funded WWII, to build highways such as the McDonald-Cartier freeway, public transportation systems, subway lines, airports, the St. Lawrence Seaway, our universal healthcare system and our Canada Pension Plan.

Unfortunately, since Canada adopted economist Milton Friedman’s theory of monetarism in 1974 this has not been the case and one can track the progression of the dismantling of Canada since then.

By 1974, Canada’s accumulated federal debt since confederation was 18 billion. By 1977, after the government reduced its use of the Bank of Canada to carry public debt, it had risen 3000% to 588 billion. Today the debt is 500 billion, 95% which is compound interest owed to private banks and investors. Currently Canadian pay 37 billion approximately per year in debt servicing.
Canada Debt Free.. is it possible?

Did you know that the Bank of Canada used to make interest free loans to municipal/provincial/federal governments before 1974 ,when the total national debt was only 18 billion dollars and you could still buy a good house for under 20 thousand, inflation was just a word. Then it seems our officials decided to stop using the Bank of Canada’s ability to print interest free money and to borrow money from private foreign banks, that love compound interest .

Does that explain our ballooning NATIONAL DEBT problem? As well as the never ending call from all governments for more and more of our hard earned money. So what can we do about it? Well a few Canadians have filed an action in Federal Court to restore the use of the Bank of Canada. The crime of this story is that none of the mainstream media has covered it.
Restore the Bank of Canada – COMER VS BOC

1) Canadian constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati , on behalf of Canadians William Krehm ,and Ann Emmett ,and COMER (Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform) on December 12th, 20011 filed an action in Federal Court, to restore the use of the Bank of Canada to its original purpose , by exercising its public statutory duty and responsibility. That purpose includes making interest free loans to the municipal/provincial/federal governments for “human capital” expenditures (education health, other social services) and / or infrastructure expenditures .

2) The Plaintiffs state that since 1974 there has been a gradual but sure slide into the reality that the Bank of Canada and Canada’s monetary and financial policy are dictated by private foreign banks and financial interests contrary to the Bank of Canada Act.

3) The plaintiffs state that the defendants (officials) are unwittingly and/ or wittingly , in varying degrees, knowledge and intent engaged in a conspiracy, along with the Bank of International Settlements(BIS),Financial Stability Forum (FSF), International Monetary Fund (IMF) to render impotent the Bank of Canada Act as well as Canadian sovereignty over financial , monetary , and socio-economic policy, and bypass the sovereign rule of Canada through its parliament by means of the banking and financial systems. http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/ ... ourts.html

Due to the fact that main stream media has not picked up this story, it will all sound foreign to you, If you would like to learn more on the Bank of Canada , I recommend that you take the time to watch, what I consider to be the best documentaries on the subject, Oh Canada Movie Our bought and sold out land .

* Here are three quotes from the Oh Canada Movie and the times in the movie to view them.

1) At 37min .08 sec into the movie Elizabeth May of the Green Party Leader says,

“The reality is the Bank of Canada has by legislation the ability to make what ever money needed, to loan the money to the government of Canada without interest .”

2) At 37min .50sec into the movie Late Jack Layton, Federal MP Leader of the NDP says “We never should of privatized our debt and turned it over to the private banks . We should have kept it in the hands of the Bank of Canada.”

3) At 42min into the movie, Paul Martin our former Prime Minister is asked if the Prime Minister has the ability to create debt free currency? “Absolutely”, Martin responds then adds,” But you have to ask the Question. Why don’t they?” Martin answers his own question “because its inflationary, it would drive inflation through the roof.”

I hope that last paragraph didn’t confuse you. I can’t believe he said it myself, I had to listen to it again . You see, we had very little inflation prior to 1974 while the Bank of Canada was creating debt free currency Inflation started with the borrowing of fiat fractional reserve money from the private banks . (Fiat money is Currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, despite the fact that it has no intrinsic value)

So if you are tired of paying these never ending taxes I do encourage you to research the above.
Update COMER VS BOC Jan 2015

Jan 26 2015 COMER (Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform EST. 1986) and constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati won yet another round of appeals. Galati the most prominent constitutional lawyer in the country says he does not believe Canada is a democracy any longer.
All posts are my opinion unless otherwise noted.
Gilchy
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2635
Joined: Nov 19th, 2010, 6:51 am

Re: Canadian court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by Gilchy »

Stating that inflation did not exist before 1974 is simply incorrect.

http://www.inflation.eu/inflation-rates/canada/historic-inflation/cpi-inflation-canada.aspx
annual inflation (dec vs. dec) inflation annual inflation (dec vs. dec) inflation
CPI Canada 2013 1.24 % CPI Canada 1981 12.12 %
CPI Canada 2012 0.83 % CPI Canada 1980 11.06 %
CPI Canada 2011 2.30 % CPI Canada 1979 9.76 %
CPI Canada 2010 2.35 % CPI Canada 1978 8.60 %
CPI Canada 2009 1.32 % CPI Canada 1977 9.40 %
CPI Canada 2008 1.16 % CPI Canada 1976 5.63 %
CPI Canada 2007 2.38 % CPI Canada 1975 9.42 %
CPI Canada 2006 1.67 % CPI Canada 1974 12.65 %
CPI Canada 2005 2.09 % CPI Canada 1973 9.38 %
CPI Canada 2004 2.13 % CPI Canada 1972 5.16 %
CPI Canada 2003 2.08 % CPI Canada 1971 4.93 %
CPI Canada 2002 3.80 % CPI Canada 1970 1.00 %
CPI Canada 2001 0.72 % CPI Canada 1969 4.69 %
CPI Canada 2000 3.20 % CPI Canada 1968 4.35 %
CPI Canada 1999 2.63 % CPI Canada 1967 3.95 %
CPI Canada 1998 1.00 % CPI Canada 1966 3.51 %
CPI Canada 1997 0.78 % CPI Canada 1965 3.01 %
CPI Canada 1996 2.16 % CPI Canada 1964 1.84 %
CPI Canada 1995 1.74 % CPI Canada 1963 1.87 %
CPI Canada 1994 0.23 % CPI Canada 1962 1.91 %
CPI Canada 1993 1.65 % CPI Canada 1961 0.00 %
CPI Canada 1992 2.17 % CPI Canada 1960 1.29 %
CPI Canada 1991 3.75 % CPI Canada 1959 1.31 %
CPI Canada 1990 4.99 % CPI Canada 1958 2.68 %
CPI Canada 1989 5.26 % CPI Canada 1957 2.05 %
CPI Canada 1988 3.88 % CPI Canada 1956 2.82 %
CPI Canada 1987 4.19 % CPI Canada 1955 0.71 %
CPI Canada 1986 4.21 % CPI Canada 1954 0.00 %
CPI Canada 1985 4.40 % CPI Canada 1953 0.00 %
CPI Canada 1984 3.72 % CPI Canada 1952 -1.40 %
CPI Canada 1983 4.59 % CPI Canada 1951 10.85 %
CPI Canada 1982 9.27 % CPI Canada 1950 5.74 %

70s and 80s inflation was hardly restricted to Canada, and had much to do with the OPEC crisis (essentially the inverse of today's situation).
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 86042
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: Canadian court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by The Green Barbarian »

Gilchy wrote:Stating that inflation did not exist before 1974 is simply incorrect.

.


LOL - there's not much in that entire article that is correct, other than Paul Martin saying that if this insane concept was actually put into practice inflation would go out of control, and he's right. If your sources for support are the Green Party and the NDP, then you really should just pack it up and go home, you're not going anywhere with your idea.
"The woke narcissists who make up the progressive left are characterized by an absolute lack of such conscience, but are experts at exploiting its presence in others." - Jordan Peterson
User avatar
GrooveTunes
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2041
Joined: Feb 19th, 2006, 7:37 pm

Re: Canadian court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by GrooveTunes »

Stating that inflation did not exist before 1974 is simply incorrect.


Where does it say that?
All posts are my opinion unless otherwise noted.
Gilchy
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2635
Joined: Nov 19th, 2010, 6:51 am

Re: Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by Gilchy »

GrooveTunes wrote:I hope that last paragraph didn’t confuse you. I can’t believe he said it myself, I had to listen to it again . You see, we had very little inflation prior to 1974 while the Bank of Canada was creating debt free currency Inflation started with the borrowing of fiat fractional reserve money from the private banks . (Fiat money is Currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, despite the fact that it has no intrinsic value)
Gilchy
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2635
Joined: Nov 19th, 2010, 6:51 am

Re: Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by Gilchy »

Read your own post, it's essentially their central thesis. And it's wrong.
Gilchy
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2635
Joined: Nov 19th, 2010, 6:51 am

Re: Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by Gilchy »

Additionally, the post talks about the "dismantling of Canada". What exactly has been dismantled / have we, as Canadians, lost?
User avatar
GrooveTunes
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2041
Joined: Feb 19th, 2006, 7:37 pm

Re: Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by GrooveTunes »

Didn't realize that "very little inflation" meant "did not exist".
All posts are my opinion unless otherwise noted.
User avatar
GrooveTunes
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2041
Joined: Feb 19th, 2006, 7:37 pm

Re: Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by GrooveTunes »

All posts are my opinion unless otherwise noted.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 86042
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by The Green Barbarian »

Step 1: Launch a stupid court case that has no hope of winning
Step 2: Introduce conspiracy theories as to why the media isn't covering your case (instead of acknowledging it's because it is stupid and has no hope of winning
Step 3: Continue to live in denial that your court case is stupid
"The woke narcissists who make up the progressive left are characterized by an absolute lack of such conscience, but are experts at exploiting its presence in others." - Jordan Peterson
Jamz
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2010, 3:19 pm

Re: Court case the mainstream media will not cover

Post by Jamz »

I would absolutely agree this is the most important court case in Canadian history. That's why the government has ordered the media blackout. It's game over when the public discover the truth of our banking system takeover back in 74. This is an excellent resource to get educated on the subject :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhlCM7NcRxw
Locked

Return to “Political Arena”