CC4BC - Non partisan?
Moderators: Jo, jennylives, Triple 6, ferri
27 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
logicalview wrote:Naturally, the first person to be negative about there being more women in poltics is the bitter old hag herself. What a surprise.
Does somebody PAY you to post brainless drivel like this?
For every talent that poverty has stimulated it has blighted a hundred.
John W. Gardner
John W. Gardner
-

flamingfingers - Guru
- Posts: 9335
- Joined: Jul 9th, 2005, 8:56 am
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
logicalview wrote:Naturally, the first person to be negative about there being more women in poltics is the bitter old hag herself. What a surprise.
Not true, I was first. and I must say your ugly personal slags against other posters is getting more than tiresome, but I guess that's all the mindless less intelligent types on here are capable of as an argument.
Nab
- NAB
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 21957
- Joined: Apr 19th, 2006, 1:33 pm
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
NAB wrote:Not true, I was first. and I must say your ugly personal slags against other posters is getting more than tiresome, but I guess that's all the mindless less intelligent types on here are capable of as an argument.
Nab
:dyinglaughing: :dyinglaughing: :dyinglaughing:
hyp·o·crite
[hip-uh-krit] Show IPA
noun
1.
Nab, who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he does not actually possess, especially as his actions belie stated beliefs.
2.
Nab, who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially as his private life, opinions, or statements belie his public statements.
I'm gonna submit this to my bud, Mr Webster. :bump:
I just saw Adrian Dix on TV, but I could only see one of his ears because he was too far to the left.
- Fisher-Dude
- Übergod
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Sep 6th, 2006, 7:43 am
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
flamingfingers wrote:
Does somebody PAY you to post brainless drivel like this?
And how much are your union buddies funnelling to you to continue to mindlessly cut and past fathead NDP lapdog bloggers?
- logicalview
- Guru
- Posts: 5176
- Joined: Feb 6th, 2006, 4:59 pm
- Location: Kelowna
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
Fisher-Dude wrote:hyp·o·crite
[hip-uh-krit] Show IPA
noun
1.
Nab, who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he does not actually possess, especially as his actions belie stated beliefs.
2.
Nab, who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially as his private life, opinions, or statements belie his public statements.
I'm gonna submit this to my bud, Mr Webster. :bump:
Another couple of brainless "contributions" from one of the usual crew of brain dead trolls.
Last edited by NAB on Jan 14th, 2013, 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- NAB
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 21957
- Joined: Apr 19th, 2006, 1:33 pm
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
logicalview wrote:
And how much are your union buddies funnelling to you to continue to mindlessly cut and past fathead NDP lapdog bloggers?
Haven't belonged to a union for over 17 years. I contract with clients - I am independent of all government tax breaks, subsidies and dodges, unlike you who belong to Hochstein's "Independent Contractors of BC" UNION.
For every talent that poverty has stimulated it has blighted a hundred.
John W. Gardner
John W. Gardner
-

flamingfingers - Guru
- Posts: 9335
- Joined: Jul 9th, 2005, 8:56 am
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
:dyinglaughing:
oh give it a rest!
:skippingsheep:
oh give it a rest!
:skippingsheep:
if you can read this, you have reeeeeeeaaaallllllly good eyesight, congratulations!
-

Logitack - Guru
- Posts: 7762
- Joined: Aug 12th, 2009, 7:13 pm
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
NAB wrote:Not true, I was first. and I must say your ugly personal slags against other posters is getting more than tiresome, but I guess that's all the mindless less intelligent types on here are capable of as an argument.
Nab
If bitter obsessed toothless old hags don't want to be insulted then perhaps they shouldn't go around telling people to pound sand and to shove their opinions up their back passages. Maplefingers deserves everything she gets, and she doesn't need tired old men worried about saving $.70 on a haircut defending her honour either, as she has none.
As for your less intelligent types comment. If you are putting yourself up as a more intelligent type then you are just fooling yourself. The brain-dead comments you have made about the HST alone make George look like Stephen Hawking.
- logicalview
- Guru
- Posts: 5176
- Joined: Feb 6th, 2006, 4:59 pm
- Location: Kelowna
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
You people are taking this too far. I will shut down the Political Arena if you can't show at least some common sense and circumspection. Good grief people.
jo@castanet.net
Old as dirt. Twice as gritty.
Old as dirt. Twice as gritty.
-

Jo - Forum Administrator
- Posts: 14696
- Joined: Nov 27th, 2004, 1:33 pm
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
Agree.
Slanderous/Ridiculous comments.
Slanderous/Ridiculous comments.
- George+
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
I just dropped in to see how the discussion was going. I'm shocked beyond belief at how ugly things have gotten around here. The vitriol being spewed on this thread is thoroughly disgusting and the moderators should've stopped it long ago. :ohmygod:
I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.
George Carlin
George Carlin
-

Verminator - Board Meister
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Feb 8th, 2010, 1:17 pm
- Location: Vernon
Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?
OR perhaps certain people could police THEMSELVES a little better??
- George+
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
27 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
© 2013 Castanet.net











