CC4BC - Non partisan?

Moderators: Jo, jennylives, Triple 6, ferri

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby flamingfingers » Jan 14th, 2013, 6:36 pm

logicalview wrote:Naturally, the first person to be negative about there being more women in poltics is the bitter old hag herself. What a surprise.


Does somebody PAY you to post brainless drivel like this?
For every talent that poverty has stimulated it has blighted a hundred.
John W. Gardner
User avatar
flamingfingers
Guru
 
Posts: 9335
Joined: Jul 9th, 2005, 8:56 am

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby NAB » Jan 14th, 2013, 6:38 pm

logicalview wrote:Naturally, the first person to be negative about there being more women in poltics is the bitter old hag herself. What a surprise.


Not true, I was first. and I must say your ugly personal slags against other posters is getting more than tiresome, but I guess that's all the mindless less intelligent types on here are capable of as an argument.

Nab
NAB
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 21957
Joined: Apr 19th, 2006, 1:33 pm

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby Fisher-Dude » Jan 14th, 2013, 7:20 pm

NAB wrote:Not true, I was first. and I must say your ugly personal slags against other posters is getting more than tiresome, but I guess that's all the mindless less intelligent types on here are capable of as an argument.

Nab



:dyinglaughing: :dyinglaughing: :dyinglaughing:


hyp·o·crite
[hip-uh-krit] Show IPA

noun
1.
Nab, who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he does not actually possess, especially as his actions belie stated beliefs.

2.
Nab, who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially as his private life, opinions, or statements belie his public statements.


I'm gonna submit this to my bud, Mr Webster. :bump:
I just saw Adrian Dix on TV, but I could only see one of his ears because he was too far to the left.
Fisher-Dude
Übergod
 
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sep 6th, 2006, 7:43 am

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby logicalview » Jan 14th, 2013, 7:24 pm

flamingfingers wrote:
Does somebody PAY you to post brainless drivel like this?


And how much are your union buddies funnelling to you to continue to mindlessly cut and past fathead NDP lapdog bloggers?
logicalview
Guru
 
Posts: 5176
Joined: Feb 6th, 2006, 4:59 pm
Location: Kelowna

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby NAB » Jan 14th, 2013, 7:27 pm

Fisher-Dude wrote:hyp·o·crite
[hip-uh-krit] Show IPA

noun
1.
Nab, who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he does not actually possess, especially as his actions belie stated beliefs.

2.
Nab, who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially as his private life, opinions, or statements belie his public statements.


I'm gonna submit this to my bud, Mr Webster. :bump:



Another couple of brainless "contributions" from one of the usual crew of brain dead trolls.
Last edited by NAB on Jan 14th, 2013, 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NAB
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 21957
Joined: Apr 19th, 2006, 1:33 pm

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby flamingfingers » Jan 14th, 2013, 7:39 pm

logicalview wrote:
And how much are your union buddies funnelling to you to continue to mindlessly cut and past fathead NDP lapdog bloggers?


Haven't belonged to a union for over 17 years. I contract with clients - I am independent of all government tax breaks, subsidies and dodges, unlike you who belong to Hochstein's "Independent Contractors of BC" UNION.
For every talent that poverty has stimulated it has blighted a hundred.
John W. Gardner
User avatar
flamingfingers
Guru
 
Posts: 9335
Joined: Jul 9th, 2005, 8:56 am

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby Logitack » Jan 14th, 2013, 9:39 pm

:dyinglaughing:

oh give it a rest!

:skippingsheep:
if you can read this, you have reeeeeeeaaaallllllly good eyesight, congratulations!
User avatar
Logitack
Guru
 
Posts: 7762
Joined: Aug 12th, 2009, 7:13 pm

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby logicalview » Jan 15th, 2013, 1:41 am

NAB wrote:Not true, I was first. and I must say your ugly personal slags against other posters is getting more than tiresome, but I guess that's all the mindless less intelligent types on here are capable of as an argument.

Nab


If bitter obsessed toothless old hags don't want to be insulted then perhaps they shouldn't go around telling people to pound sand and to shove their opinions up their back passages. Maplefingers deserves everything she gets, and she doesn't need tired old men worried about saving $.70 on a haircut defending her honour either, as she has none.

As for your less intelligent types comment. If you are putting yourself up as a more intelligent type then you are just fooling yourself. The brain-dead comments you have made about the HST alone make George look like Stephen Hawking.
logicalview
Guru
 
Posts: 5176
Joined: Feb 6th, 2006, 4:59 pm
Location: Kelowna

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby Jo » Jan 15th, 2013, 7:28 am

You people are taking this too far. I will shut down the Political Arena if you can't show at least some common sense and circumspection. Good grief people.
jo@castanet.net
Old as dirt. Twice as gritty.
User avatar
Jo
Forum Administrator
 
Posts: 14696
Joined: Nov 27th, 2004, 1:33 pm

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby George+ » Jan 15th, 2013, 10:57 am

Agree.
Slanderous/Ridiculous comments.
George+
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2906
Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby Verminator » Jan 26th, 2013, 1:48 pm

I just dropped in to see how the discussion was going. I'm shocked beyond belief at how ugly things have gotten around here. The vitriol being spewed on this thread is thoroughly disgusting and the moderators should've stopped it long ago. :ohmygod:
I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.
George Carlin
User avatar
Verminator
Board Meister
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Feb 8th, 2010, 1:17 pm
Location: Vernon

Re: CC4BC - Non partisan?

Postby George+ » Jan 26th, 2013, 3:37 pm

OR perhaps certain people could police THEMSELVES a little better??
George+
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2906
Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm

Previous

Return to BC Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests