Bush Crime Family

[peaceseeker]

Bob Marley: Born February 6, 1945 - "Confident of the victory of good over evil"
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/good ... zAxde.dpuf



Why did Neil Bush impersonate a journalist to get access to Marley after allies of his father shot him?

Yes.

It happened.

Neil Bush - the Bush who defrauded banks during the Savings and Loan Crisis - impersonated a reporter from Rolling Stone Magazine to get access to Marley after he was shot in a failed assassination attempt.

Why?

And did this visit have something to do with Marley coming down with an especially virulent form of cancer and dying shortly thereafter.

Details from John Judge: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/25333.html

John Judge on the Bush family 1988 - He saw Bush Jr. coming decades earlier - and Neil and Jeb too
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/the- ... znxxn.dpuf



This talk was 12 years before Bush the Idiot became president

John Judge was one of the finest researchers we've ever had.

He passed away recently (April 2014).

In this talk he talks about the young Bush family.

Twelve years before Bush the Idiot became president, his pockets were already being lined by various Middle Eastern clients of the Bush family.

But the real story is the visit Ned Bush paid on Bob Marley just days after Marley was shot. Bush impersonated a Rolling Stone reporter to get access to him.

You tell me...

Further down the rabbit hole; Another patrician young man whose father had been CIA Director, Carl Colby, also found it necessary to wangle access to Marley during this period.

Details: http://www.hightimes.com/read/chanting- ... bob-marley

[ValB58]

REALLY? A link to "High Times"?

ARE YOU HIGH?

[sanfish]

^^^^^ that's quite the logical argument Val. You have me convinced . Nothing to see here

[LordEd]

This is conspiracy. There's never anything to see here.

[LANDM]

OCD is your friend.

Wow, there is a real focus here......how do you find time to think about how bad vaccines are?

[sanfish]

This is conspiracy. There's never anything to see here.

Except for all the times it's come true ( and of course all the ones that happen that we've never heard about) but yes again another example of a compelling argument. You disappoint me Lord. Generally your posts have far more substance at least ( even when we disagree ) than many of the clowns who just automatically dismiss anything not spoon fed to them by their masters

[Passion4Truth]

This is conspiracy. There's never anything to see here.

Ed Bush, is that you? lol

[peaceseeker]

REALLY? A link to "High Times"?

ARE YOU HIGH?

This is conspiracy. There's never anything to see here.

OCD is your friend.

Wow, there is a real focus here......how do you find time to think about how bad vaccines are?

'I've seen all good people turn their heads each day
So satisfied I'm on my way'

[ValB58]

This is conspiracy. There's never anything to see here.

Except for all the times it's come true ( and of course all the ones that happen that we've never heard about) but yes again another example of a compelling argument. You disappoint me Lord. Generally your posts have far more substance at least ( even when we disagree ) than many of the clowns who just automatically dismiss anything not spoon fed to them by their masters

Just like betting on heads 23 times in a row......sooner or later a tails has to come up. Intelligence comes from experience and my experiences tell me, I am right.

[FreeRights]

Except for all the times it's come true ( and of course all the ones that happen that we've never heard about) but yes again another example of a compelling argument. You disappoint me Lord. Generally your posts have far more substance at least ( even when we disagree ) than many of the clowns who just automatically dismiss anything not spoon fed to them by their masters

So you're okay with essentially inventing random, baseless theories sustained by no evidence, in the hopes that a handful of them prove to be kind-of right?

[sanfish]

So you're okay with essentially inventing random, baseless theories sustained by no evidence, in the hopes that a handful of them prove to be kind-of right?

Even if you're comprehenshion of what I was saying was even anywhere near to being close, I'd still find this comment ironic coming from someone with your screen name. However , that's not what I was saying at all. What I WAS commenting on was the absurdity of the blanket statement made in the post I was replying too. It's not ok to just invent anything ( well I guess except for "inventions "). I'm saying the only thing more idiotic than the bat *bleep* craziest "ct" is the the belief that anything that goes against the "official" story is just a "crazy conspiracy theory" .

[ValB58]

So you're okay with essentially inventing random, baseless theories sustained by no evidence, in the hopes that a handful of them prove to be kind-of right?

Even if you're comprehenshion of what I was saying was even anywhere near to being close, I'd still find this comment ironic coming from someone with your screen name. However , that's not what I was saying at all. What I WAS commenting on was the absurdity of the blanket statement made in the post I was replying too. It's not ok to just invent anything ( well I guess except for "inventions "). I'm saying the only thing more idiotic than the bat *bleep* craziest "ct" is the the belief that anything that goes against the "official" story is just a "crazy conspiracy theory" .

THIS from someone that judges another based upon their "screen name"? You have lost all credibility in all future comments.

Just another pile of compost. Have a nice day.

[sanfish]

^^^^^ please try making sense . Are you 12? Who the hell would judge someone on a screen name? My god so many clowns not nearly enough circuses . My screen name is sanfish for crying out loud. However if you do not see the irony of someone naming themselves free rights telling someone else what they should think then you either don't understand the meaning of irony or freedom. Just so there's no misunderstanding, I don't think you're an *bleep* because of your name but rather your comments

[ValB58]

^^^^^^ I believe you are a communist. NOT by the one comment alone but, by ALL of you comments combined.

[sanfish]

^^^^^^ I believe you are a communist. NOT by the one comment alone but, by ALL of you comments combined.

Then you're even dumber than you sound. Anyone who knows anything about me ( or has basic reading comprehension) would know that not only do I like "shiny things" and am willing to work more and harder to get them but more importantly that I think all those designations are just a way to manipulate people and keep them divided . I am no ism or ist