Child Porn - 2 years

User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by the truth »

this is why i think pedofiles can not be treated ever, its just how there brain is hardwired ,safe bet since birth

no different than the rest of us , if your born knowing you like members of the opposite sex or even same sex it is what it is you were born that way, then if all of a sudden your told you are no longer aloud to have sex with the gender you are attracted to or you will go to jail ,no way in hell your going to stop and no way in hell any program they make you take will ever work ,
hope this makes sense
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
KelownaCrackinCrew
Fledgling
Posts: 301
Joined: Apr 6th, 2017, 1:12 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by KelownaCrackinCrew »

You know what they call people like this, GOOFS. He'll get his in jail. I think our Judges are on the same diet mayor Rob Ford was on.
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by the truth »

KelownaCrackinCrew wrote:You know what they call people like this, GOOFS. He'll get his in jail. I think our Judges are on the same diet mayor Rob Ford was on.


no he will not get his in jail--sad but true, he will be in pc with his kind
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
my5cents
Guru
Posts: 8380
Joined: Nov 14th, 2009, 2:22 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by my5cents »

Fancy wrote:At least he received more than the minimum and has to leave the province.


I've read several of the news accounts of his sentence and don't see anything about him having to leave the province, did I miss that somewhere ??

He can apply for parole after serving 1/3 of his sentence, so after 8 months. He must be released (statutory release) after serving 2/3 of his sentence. So the most he will serve is 16 months.

I'm sure his gymnast's fathers would have been OK with a conditional discharge as long as they got to give him an hour or two of gymnastic lessons first.

Likely he won't get much in jail, he'll never see "gen pop", he'll be with the rest of the skinners. Likely hone the skills of his hobby. "What f stop is best when hiding a GoPro in a garbage can at a park with natural lighting"
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who haven't got it"
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72224
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by Fancy »

Part of his bail condition he has to live with his mother in Toronto
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
my5cents
Guru
Posts: 8380
Joined: Nov 14th, 2009, 2:22 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by my5cents »

Fancy wrote:Part of his bail condition he has to live with his mother in Toronto

That would be before he was sentenced, his pre-trial release provisions.
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who haven't got it"
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by the truth »

i have read articles in the past were sex offenders having been forced to take sex offender programs in jail said did nothing
for them if anything they said it made them worse when they came out , because while they were in sex offender group in jail listening to other sex offenders crimes all it did was get them excited and fantasize :200:
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
User avatar
Hmmm
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3152
Joined: Jan 6th, 2012, 6:27 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by Hmmm »

i cannot post what I'm thinking here. Needless to say it would involve a more fitting sentence.
I thought you said your dog doesn't bite....That's not my dog.
gman313
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3538
Joined: Sep 15th, 2008, 8:03 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by gman313 »

Hmmm wrote:i cannot post what I'm thinking here. Needless to say it would involve a more fitting sentence.


hmmmm


sorry had to
voice of reason
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2312
Joined: Feb 22nd, 2009, 11:40 am

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by voice of reason »

some people are just broken and should be culled from the herd
humphriey
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Dec 1st, 2006, 1:49 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by humphriey »

I am absolutely enraged that this sick *bleep* will only serve 2 years. What a joke!!! He preyed on these young girls. Young girls who trusted and idolized him. One of whom tried to commit suicide once his betrayal was discovered. These girls will NEVER fully recover from this, their innocence and ability to trust people is forever changed.
He had over 2000 photos on his laptop. Sick twisted photos, some were of babies engaged in sex acts. Two years for this??? Our judicial system has re-victimized these girls and caused just as much or MORE pain than the original crime against them.
Once again we send the message to our young girls and young women that any form of sexual assault against them is not really that serious and they should just accept it and move on. No big deal, nothing to see here!!!
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by the truth »

imo. the lawyer that defended this scum is no better
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72224
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by Fancy »

the truth wrote:imo. the lawyer that defended this scum is no better

That doesn't even make sense. So never have lawyers defend anyone? Even the guilty have rights and there was the Crown's stance on it. What were their recommendations?
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72224
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by Fancy »

http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/news/ ... 36b3c.html
Even though there was a publication ban, there were still articles about this so I'm surprised no one posted about this before.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
Catsumi
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 19802
Joined: May 24th, 2017, 8:26 pm

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Post by Catsumi »

Every time I start watching a movie on dvd I have to chortle while this warning churns out:

It basically says

If you have the temerity to copy this film, you can be fined $50,000.00 USD and be jailed five (5) years

Ok, so now we have priorities in the correct order!
:cuss:
Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. There’s a certain point at which ignorance becomes malice, at which there is simply no way to become THAT ignorant except deliberately and maliciously.

Unknown
Post Reply

Return to “Central Okanagan”