US elects trans person

User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17124
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

US elects trans person

Post by maryjane48 »

MCB
Generalissimo Postalot
Posts: 921
Joined: Mar 13th, 2008, 5:37 am

Re: US elects trans person

Post by MCB »

...yay? :135:
RupertBear
Übergod
Posts: 1334
Joined: Feb 24th, 2010, 9:00 pm

Re: US elects trans person

Post by RupertBear »

Congratulations to Danica Roem. The voters obviously elected the candidate that brought the best ideas to the table.
"Do the best with what you know, and when you know better, do better." -- Maya Angelou
User avatar
Verum
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2109
Joined: Oct 6th, 2017, 12:31 am

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Verum »

Sometimes the best man for a job is a woman :biggrin:
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39043
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: US elects trans person

Post by GordonH »

I'm probably going to get a bunch of feedback on this one.
I never vote for someone based on gender, physical appearance etc.... etc
I place my X on a ballot based on what person says, how they say it. What they want to do once they get to city hall, Victoria or Ottawa.
As well if I know they would be the best person out of those seeking my vote & the job.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
User avatar
Verum
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2109
Joined: Oct 6th, 2017, 12:31 am

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Verum »

GordonH wrote:I'm probably going to get a bunch of feedback on this one.
I never vote for someone based on gender, physical appearance etc.... etc
I place my X on a ballot based on what person says, how they say it. What they want to do once they get to city hall, Victoria or Ottawa.
As well if I know they would be the best person out of those seeking my vote & the job.

You would be unusual in that case. Most people are biased, consciously or not. There is lots of evidence that we prefer people who look like us, or share other traits, even when such has nothing to do with someone's ability to do a job.
http://conf.som.yale.edu/obsummer07/PaperBen-NerKramer.pdf
I gather that even when we know this, it still doesn't remove the bias, unfortunately. Roem had to overcome significant bias to have a chance of winning, so this is quite an achievement.
techrtr
Übergod
Posts: 1643
Joined: Jul 5th, 2005, 7:47 am

Re: US elects trans person

Post by techrtr »

Must drive Trump crazy especially since she beat the Republican incumbent (who apparently isn't too fond of transgendered people). Way to stick it to em!
User avatar
Glacier
The Pilgrim
Posts: 40406
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Glacier »

I voted Green last election because she was the best looking candidate running in the riding.
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
christopher
Board Meister
Posts: 438
Joined: Jun 9th, 2016, 10:10 pm

Re: US elects trans person

Post by christopher »

GEE in the middle of Dixie home of Robert E Lee, Home of the confederate flag, home of all the bigots and racists, that is what the media had said I guess they are not as backwards as the media was reporting what a surprise.
User avatar
Verum
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2109
Joined: Oct 6th, 2017, 12:31 am

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Verum »

christopher wrote:GEE in the middle of Dixie home of Robert E Lee, Home of the confederate flag, home of all the bigots and racists, that is what the media had said I guess they are not as backwards as the media was reporting what a surprise.

Maybe only 45% are bigoted, since that's the % who voted for Bob Marshall, an extremely bigoted, homophobic, transphobic, anti-choice, anti-contraception, dinosaur of a politician.
User avatar
Glacier
The Pilgrim
Posts: 40406
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Glacier »

That's just dishonest. People take many things into account when voting. You are NOT condoning everything the person does in their personal life nor their positions on everything. If you were, you'd NEVER vote for anyone since everyone holds views you don't like.

It's like the illogical folks who claim that a bunch of racists voted for Obama and then voted for Trump. People vote for many different reasons, and most important of all is political affiliation irregardless of policies. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... servatives
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
christopher
Board Meister
Posts: 438
Joined: Jun 9th, 2016, 10:10 pm

Re: US elects trans person

Post by christopher »

Verum wrote:
christopher wrote:GEE in the middle of Dixie home of Robert E Lee, Home of the confederate flag, home of all the bigots and racists, that is what the media had said I guess they are not as backwards as the media was reporting what a surprise.

Maybe only 45% are bigoted, since that's the % who voted for Bob Marshall, an extremely bigoted, homophobic, transphobic, anti-choice, anti-contraception, dinosaur of a politician.


I have traveled the Southern States extensively maybe more like bigots 10% tops, homophobic, transphobic will be higher then most states but I can tell you it is a great place to visit full of wonderful people black and white.
User avatar
Verum
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2109
Joined: Oct 6th, 2017, 12:31 am

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Verum »

Glacier wrote:That's just dishonest. People take many things into account when voting. You are NOT condoning everything the person does in their personal life nor their positions on everything. If you were, you'd NEVER vote for anyone since everyone holds views you don't like.

It's like the illogical folks who claim that a bunch of racists voted for Obama and then voted for Trump. People vote for many different reasons, and most important of all is political affiliation irregardless of policies. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... servatives

It's not dishonest at all. I never said that 45% were bigoted, only that maybe they were. It was an obviously absurd response to a similarly absurd statement. I would have thought that was obvious.

That said, if you support/vote for someone who is so clearly a bigot, you are essentially supporting such bigotry, even if it is the lesser of two evils in your mind. You don't get a bye on that just because you agree on transport policy or similar.
User avatar
Verum
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2109
Joined: Oct 6th, 2017, 12:31 am

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Verum »

christopher wrote: I have traveled the Southern States extensively maybe more like bigots 10% tops, homophobic, transphobic will be higher then most states but I can tell you it is a great place to visit full of wonderful people black and white.

I wouldn't be surprised at all. I actually don't think that these places are largely populated by raging bigots or similar. I would say that such attitudes do still have a lot of sway, especially in politics though, but as we see in our own province, even a few percent can have a very powerful effect on policy.
User avatar
Glacier
The Pilgrim
Posts: 40406
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: US elects trans person

Post by Glacier »

Verum wrote:It's not dishonest at all. I never said that 45% were bigoted, only that maybe they were. It was an obviously absurd response to a similarly absurd statement. I would have thought that was obvious.

That said, if you support/vote for someone who is so clearly a bigot, you are essentially supporting such bigotry, even if it is the lesser of two evils in your mind. You don't get a bye on that just because you agree on transport policy or similar.

You said that maybe 45% voted on a single issue. Maybe the moon landing was faked too. That's how ridiculously low the odds are of this being the case. I know many Americans, and I can say that even among Republican leaning ones, they couldn't care less for the most part as to what you do in your own bedroom.

In fact, I would say that being against gay marriage and LGBT rights is probably one of the most politically toxic positions you can take, even during republican primaries. You had a social conservative (Ted Cruz) running against a social liberal (Donald J. Trump), and Trump won out. MANY republicans did not like Cruz because he seemed to care about LGBT issues. The majority of voters would rather have a womanizing hedonist representing them than a moralizing prude.

Now, yes, I know that you had people like Caitlin Jenner and such who backed Cruz and you had socially conservative types who backed Trump, but generally speaking most Republicans didn't have a probably with supporting a candidate who supported gay rights 20 years before Hillary Clinton did. It's 2017, so gay rights is no longer an issue. You might gain a few votes by beating that dead horse, but you'll lose twice as many in the process. Americans are not homophobic.

In fact, a higher percentage of Americans support gay marriage than percentage of French and Germans do... https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphic ... bl%2Fed%2F
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
Post Reply

Return to “World”