Home owner confronting possible thief?

dogspoiler
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17606
Joined: Feb 20th, 2009, 3:32 am

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by dogspoiler »

Does anyone have any new information ? I haven't heard anything about this case.
Black Dogs Matter
Donald G
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 20156
Joined: Jan 29th, 2008, 8:42 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by Donald G »

When year after year people see our Criminal Court judges supporting an extreme left wing catch and release program regarding repetitious crime they get angry. and self justify vigilante justice.

Vigilante justice can not be condoned, but when anger takes over from reason anything can happen and in this case it DID happen. The road to hell is paved with good intentions ... both in Criminal Court and in the World of Vigilante Justice.
TylerM4
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3504
Joined: Feb 27th, 2014, 3:22 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by TylerM4 »

Donald G wrote:When year after year people see our Criminal Court judges supporting an extreme left wing catch and release program regarding repetitious crime they get angry. and self justify vigilante justice.


So. Is this really a fault of bleeding heart liberals? Because there's lots of studies on this and it's been proven time and time again - hash penalties don't make a difference. The only thing they do is keep a criminal locked up so they can't commit more crime.

There are also lots of studies that show keeping people in jail is very expensive and that money is more effectively used in other ways (such as addiction and mental health services) if the goal is to prevent crime.

You can blame "Extreme left wing" all you want, but I'd say logic and common sense are the biggest drivers behind this.
dogspoiler
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17606
Joined: Feb 20th, 2009, 3:32 am

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by dogspoiler »

That's all great. Now how about an update on what's going on ?
Black Dogs Matter
User avatar
oneh2obabe
feistres Goruchaf y Bwrdd
Posts: 85844
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 8:19 am

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by oneh2obabe »

Next court date is Sept. 15, 2016. You won't hear or read anything about the case as the Court rendered a ban on publication on July 18, 2016.
Dance as if no one's watching, sing as if no one's listening, and live everyday as if it were your last.

Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain.
User avatar
kgcayenne
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 14475
Joined: Aug 10th, 2005, 6:35 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by kgcayenne »

I did a little digging and some FB searches, and I think that Jessie is still alive, but have no insight as to his condition. Fundraising continues.
"without knowledge, he multiplies mere words."
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your kids.
dogspoiler
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17606
Joined: Feb 20th, 2009, 3:32 am

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by dogspoiler »

Apparently the homeowner has now been granted bail, does anyone know the condition of the young man ?
Black Dogs Matter
User avatar
kgcayenne
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 14475
Joined: Aug 10th, 2005, 6:35 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by kgcayenne »

Nothing other than Kamloops news media’s mentioning that he began to wake up in 2017 after brain surgery and has since had fluctuating health.
"without knowledge, he multiplies mere words."
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your kids.
User avatar
forum
Guru
Posts: 6669
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 9:08 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by forum »

You'd think one woukd let the kid sneak inside the house.
Be patient. Wait and watch.
Let them be clear with their intentions.

At that moment when they are fully inside the house, one would get to close the door behind them and rightfully serve and protect.
User avatar
alanjh595
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 19654
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 5:18 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by alanjh595 »

That would be considered a "booby trap", and is illegal in Canada.

VERY poor advice that could make the resident into a defendant.
Bring back the LIKE button.
User avatar
forum
Guru
Posts: 6669
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 9:08 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by forum »

*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Aug 31st, 2018, 8:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Off Topic
dogspoiler
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17606
Joined: Feb 20th, 2009, 3:32 am

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by dogspoiler »

alanjh595 wrote:That would be considered a "booby trap", and is illegal in Canada.

VERY poor advice that could make the resident into a defendant.

That would not be a booby trap. A booby trap is made to function on it's own. Think Rat Trap.
Black Dogs Matter
User avatar
alanjh595
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 19654
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 5:18 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by alanjh595 »

The quote is:
At that moment when they are fully inside the house, one would get to close the door behind them and rightfully serve and protect.

That would be equal to forcible confinement:
Forcible confinement
(2) Every one who, without lawful authority, confines, imprisons or forcibly seizes another person is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.


Do you really want to pay for lawyers to defend you in court?
Bring back the LIKE button.
User avatar
forum
Guru
Posts: 6669
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 9:08 pm

Re: Home owner confronting possible thief?

Post by forum »

If one were to close the backdoor, the front door would be a viable option to leave. Otherwise... It's on.
buteman
Fledgling
Posts: 143
Joined: Dec 29th, 2011, 11:29 am

What in the name of God is wrong with our justice system?

Post by buteman »

I was totally shocked at the final outcome of Kristopher Teichrieb's trial. This individual attacked an eighteen year old youth with a baseball bat causing devastating injuries.
The attack was unprovoked ( a proven fact ) the young man posed no threat whatsoever to Teichrieb. Not only did Teichrieb fracture the kid's skull with the bat, he was seen to drag the kid across a road afterwards and kick him violently in the head.

The victim was rushed to hospital where emergency brain surgery was performed in an attempt to save the boy's life. The boy was in a coma for a couple of months but he did survive ( if you can call it that ). The boy has permanent brain damage, he is blind in one eye and he will never be able to walk again.

Teichrieb was found guilty of " assault causing bodily harm " ,,, yes indeed the s.o.b. certainly caused " bodily harm ". Teichrieb was sentenced to seven years imprisonment, the prosecutor called the sentence " significant ". What ? " significant " you're kidding right ? she must have been smoking some of Turdeau's legalized weed.

So Teichrieb was arrested in June of 2016, given credit for time served he will now served approximately two years and three months before he will be released and walk out of jail. Well we certainly know his victim won't be walking anywhere not now or in the future. This sentence is absolutely outrageous an absolute disgrace ,,, I really have to ask what in the name of God is wrong with our justice system !!

By the way I'm hoping that the family of this victim may sue Teichrieb ,, they certainly have a case.

Return to “North Okanagan”