Vernon Balloon Glow Cancelled

Vernon Balloon Glow Cancelled

Postby kiabird » Jan 16th, 2019, 2:21 pm

How sad.

Castanet story explained reasons were: soft ground at Polson Park, lack of parking (has there ever been enough parking?), and
"but City of Vernon Parks Department requirements were too expensive for the glow in the new location."

Why isn't City of Vernon providing them with a FREE spot?
We pay taxes for wonderful events like this, all part of Winter Carnival.

I hope Vernon's new mayor immediately cancels the COST to all the folks who bring their balloons for Winter Carnival.
This is part of Vernon's culture!
Obviously the city needs a reminder.

https://www.castanet.net/news/Vernon/24 ... -cancelled
Last edited by ferri on Jan 16th, 2019, 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Link to article added.

Tony likes this post.
kiabird
 
Posts: 2
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2016, 8:03 am

Re: Vernon Balloon Glow Cancelled

Postby OKkayak » Jan 16th, 2019, 11:04 pm

I seem to remember a group of Lower East Hill residents whining about the Balloon Glow a few years back. Seems like the NIMBYs got their way again.
User avatar
OKkayak
√úbergod
 
Posts: 1567
Likes: 1202 posts
Liked in: 1484 posts
Joined: May 14th, 2018, 10:10 pm

Re: Vernon Balloon Glow Cancelled

Postby kiabird » Jan 17th, 2019, 8:18 am

There'll always be NIMBYs.
But the City of Vernon charging them a FEE to land/take off from City owned property is disgusting.
Why not the Racetrack site now that the court case is over? And FREE!
kiabird
 
Posts: 2
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 1 post
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2016, 8:03 am

Re: Vernon Balloon Glow Cancelled

Postby Hassel99 » Jan 18th, 2019, 4:34 pm

kiabird wrote:There'll always be NIMBYs.
But the City of Vernon charging them a FEE to land/take off from City owned property is disgusting.
Why not the Racetrack site now that the court case is over? And FREE!



Uh its pretty normal to charge a park use fee for special events. I think its $185
They also need to have a special event permit and liability insurance

All reasonable things a city should demand to avoid chaos and deterioration in our parks.

In the article they list 4 reasons why it will not go on, why are you just focusing on one?

I think the fact they admitted they did not have the "manpower" seems to be the largest reason.

Tony likes this post.
User avatar
Hassel99
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3602
Likes: 1065 posts
Liked in: 3142 posts
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2012, 8:31 am


Return to North Okanagan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 2 guests