Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Fire-related topics
zerograv
Übergod
Posts: 1125
Joined: Mar 5th, 2009, 8:49 pm

Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by zerograv »

Before giving someone a piece of your mind, make sure that you have enough to spare.
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
Posts: 9118
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 9:32 am

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by Frisk »

Outdated and ineffective. Seriously why do people want it back?
User avatar
dieseluphammerdown
Guru
Posts: 5255
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2009, 8:31 am

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by dieseluphammerdown »

Quailize wrote:Outdated and ineffective. Seriously why do people want it back?
how so ?
This message brought to you by a proud old stock Canadian.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Id love to spit some beechnut in that dudes eyes
And shoot him with my old 45
GordonH
Grumpy Old Bleep
Posts: 33385
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by GordonH »

Maybe its no so much wanting them back, as it could be running low on resources to fight fires.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
birdsarentreal.com
User avatar
Barney Google
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3875
Joined: Feb 6th, 2010, 9:10 am

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by Barney Google »

http://www.castanet.net/edition/news-st ... htm#143564

Obviously a lot of people must think bringing them back is important
“Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That way if he gets angry, he'll be a mile away and barefoot. ”
- Unknown
madadam
Generalissimo Postalot
Posts: 902
Joined: Nov 28th, 2004, 7:03 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by madadam »

Shouldn't it be Martin Mar as only 1 plane may be coming back to service. And here is more info on the one he is trying to get sent to a museum in the States.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadia ... -1.3065537
GordonH
Grumpy Old Bleep
Posts: 33385
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by GordonH »

Air Tractors are much more effective, in time it takes that flying monster to get 1 load the smaller faster air tractors can get many loads.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
birdsarentreal.com
zerograv
Übergod
Posts: 1125
Joined: Mar 5th, 2009, 8:49 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by zerograv »

http://www.alberniweather.ca/fire/MarsRebuttal.pdf

here is an interesting read. At the end of the day I think Conairs $108,000 liberal donation has more to do with Coulson Group not receiving a contract in the past. That and they supported the NDP. The province needs resources to fight these fires, political BS shouldn't have anything to do with it. There is a fire in Sproat Lake and the Plane is just sitting there, it doesn't make sense to me.
Before giving someone a piece of your mind, make sure that you have enough to spare.
LoneWolf_53
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 12496
Joined: Mar 19th, 2005, 12:06 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by LoneWolf_53 »

GordonH wrote:Air Tractors are much more effective, in time it takes that flying monster to get 1 load the smaller faster air tractors can get many loads.


Perhaps but sometimes wouldn't you say one good dump is better than ten smaller ones? 8-P
"Death is life's way of saying you're fired!"
GordonH
Grumpy Old Bleep
Posts: 33385
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by GordonH »

^^^ Smaller lakes needed with the smaller water tanker. Could mean being closer to the fire.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
birdsarentreal.com
zerograv
Übergod
Posts: 1125
Joined: Mar 5th, 2009, 8:49 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by zerograv »

Did BC lose lakes or something? because for 53 years there was enough lakes in BC for the Mars to service the province, but now there isn't? hmmmm...
Before giving someone a piece of your mind, make sure that you have enough to spare.
GordonH
Grumpy Old Bleep
Posts: 33385
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by GordonH »

Curious question:
How much to run Mars per day compared to Air Tractor (how many Air Tractors can run per day for price of the Mars). Does anyone know this answer.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
birdsarentreal.com
Swoop
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2738
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 3:54 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by Swoop »

zerograv wrote:Did BC lose lakes or something? because for 53 years there was enough lakes in BC for the Mars to service the province, but now there isn't? hmmmm...


...it's got to do with the number of available lakes the aircraft can safely land/takeoff from...from the news story:

"The new skimmers can take water from about 1,700 lakes, where as the Martin Mars could only scoop water from 113,” she stated.
canuck500
Fledgling
Posts: 277
Joined: May 29th, 2011, 5:28 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by canuck500 »

This might answer some of your questions https://news.gov.bc.ca/factsheets/facts ... -martin-ma
madadam
Generalissimo Postalot
Posts: 902
Joined: Nov 28th, 2004, 7:03 pm

Re: Province in discussions with owners of Martin Mars

Post by madadam »

This was in the global link:

“In 2013, when the Wildfire Management Branch last used the Martin Mars, the season rate was $672,300 with a flying time cost of $4,000 per hour for the first 45 hours and $18,800 per hour for any additional hours. This rate does not include fuel,” they said in a statement last year.

"They also only used the planes 20 times from 2007 to 2013, approximately 0.5 per cent of the airtanker missions flown during that time."

Return to “Fire Watch 2015”