Diamond Creek Fire

User avatar
Glacier
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33660
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by Glacier »

I count the Canadian portion as 10,212.87 hectares.
The worst part about a 7 day lockdown is the first 4 months.
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17124
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by maryjane48 »

Glacier wrote:I count the Canadian portion as 10,212.87 hectares.

which is 20000 acres ?
User avatar
JagXKR
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2925
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by JagXKR »

25000 acres
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
Posts: 9072
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 9:32 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by Frisk »

Looks like it's getting a soaking from a thunderstorm right now.
User avatar
Drip_Torch
Lord of the Board
Posts: 4023
Joined: Aug 16th, 2012, 10:56 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by Drip_Torch »

Glacier wrote:I count the Canadian portion as 10,212.87 hectares.


Bob Barker rules... closest retail HA burned, without going over.

Sound the four descending horn tones.
Drip Torch - an upright and steadfast keeper of the flame, but when tilted sideways the contents spill and then our destiny is in the wind...
User avatar
JagXKR
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2925
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by JagXKR »

Now estimated to be 8031 ha and into Cathedral Park.

http://bcfireinfo.for.gov.bc.ca/ftp/!Pr ... 170909.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.
User avatar
JagXKR
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2925
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by JagXKR »

Now at 9555 ha. It's sure going to get rid of a lot of beetle kill.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.
User avatar
ferri
Forum Administrator
Posts: 53665
Joined: May 11th, 2005, 3:21 pm

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by ferri »

Okanogan County Emergency Management
1 hr ·
DIAMOND CREEK FIRE LEVEL TWO EVACUATION ALERT:
The Diamond Creek Fire is advancing south in the Monument Creek drainage and south in Pat Creek. (CORRECTION it is in Pat Creek and NOT in Auburn Creek or Goat Creek.)
Due to the forecasted strong north winds and the location of the fire, the USFS along with Fire District 6 and Okanogan County Emergency Management have issued a LEVEL TWO (2) EVACUATION for the Lost River area to Mazama, East to Lancaster Road near Mile Post 188 on State Route 20, North to Diamond T Road off of Rendezvous Road, North to Cub Creek Road intersection with Forest Service Road 5215300, and West to Lost River.
This is the same area that was issued a Level One (1) Alert last week. No other areas are under advisories.
This is a LEVEL TWO (2) “BE READY” to evacuate notice.
You must be prepared to leave at a moment’s notice. Persons should have an evacuation plan in place. Persons should be aware of their surroundings and take action if needed.
You should monitor local media outlets and Okanogan County Emergency Management’s FACEBOOK page for up-to-date information.
A Community meeting will held TODAY, September 13, 2017 at 6:00 PM at the Mazama Community Club located at 512 Goat Creek Road, Mazama, for the Mazama and Lost River community members to be updated on the Diamond Creek Fire and the LEVEL TWO (2) EVACUATION.
2017-09-13 9:10 am
“Weak people revenge. Strong people forgive. Intelligent people ignore.”
― Albert Einstein
User avatar
ferri
Forum Administrator
Posts: 53665
Joined: May 11th, 2005, 3:21 pm

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by ferri »

I saw this on facebook and thought I'd better share. :)

NASA.jpg


An American Aerosol in Paris

On September 5, 2017, residents of the Pacific Northwest awoke to ash falling from the sky like snow. But even as ash hit the ground, wildfires burning across the western United States and Canada lofted smoke high into the atmosphere. Some of it drifted all the way to Europe.

Snapshots of the smoke’s intercontinental journey are shown in the maps above. The data were collected from September 4–7 by the Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite (OMPS) on the Suomi NPP satellite. The maps show relative aerosol concentrations, with lower concentrations in yellow and higher concentrations in dark orange-brown.

Throughout the series, high concentrations of aerosols appear over their sources in the Pacific Northwest. But prevailing winds also swept up the high-altitude smoke aerosols and carried them east across the continent. On September 4, the smoke appears to have arrived over the U.S. Midwest, and by September 5 it reached Newfoundland. By September 6, the smoke cloud is obvious over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.

“You can see that the smoke cloud on September 6 is part of the long stream of smoke emanating from the Pacific Northwest,” said Colin Seftor, an atmospheric scientist working for NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. “It almost looks like it was flung across the Atlantic.”

By September 7, the smoke had arrived over Ireland, the United Kingdom, and northern France. These aerosols are high in the atmosphere, so they are not a serious concern for near-ground air quality and human health. Still, it shows how events on one continent can have effects halfway around the world.

“It’s not that uncommon for smoke from fires in North America to reach Europe,” Seftor said. He has casually noticed, however, that the smoke clouds reaching Europe this year seem to be larger and thicker. He also points out that they seem to be more persistent; large fires in mid-August sent smoke to Europe that hung around for days.

Wildfires were burning long before these maps were compiled, and they continue to burn even now. Record heat in parts of the U.S. West has been cited as a possible cause for the widespread fire activity this year—which was somewhat unexpected, given the region’s wet winter and spring.

“There has been a lot of smoke over the whole northern hemisphere this year, and that is somewhat striking to me,” Seftor said. “It’s going to take awhile for everything to dissipate.”

https://go.nasa.gov/2eZIoCx
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
“Weak people revenge. Strong people forgive. Intelligent people ignore.”
― Albert Einstein
User avatar
JagXKR
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2925
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by JagXKR »

Up to 10,466 ha now. And with this wind I expect significant growth.
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.
User avatar
Drip_Torch
Lord of the Board
Posts: 4023
Joined: Aug 16th, 2012, 10:56 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by Drip_Torch »

^^^^ Just to be clear, I don't really like that post, but I certainly do agree with it. ^^^^
Drip Torch - an upright and steadfast keeper of the flame, but when tilted sideways the contents spill and then our destiny is in the wind...
User avatar
Glacier
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33660
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by Glacier »

The air is a bit smokey today. It must be Diamond Creek.
The worst part about a 7 day lockdown is the first 4 months.
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
Posts: 9072
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 9:32 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by Frisk »

This fire has lots of similarities to Colorado's unusual winter "Fern lake fire" in 2012. Particularly the high altitude steep terrain and heavy beetle kill. Could be a thing for a while longer if we don't get any significant rain.

https://www.nps.gov/romo/learn/nature/fern_lake_fire.htm
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
Posts: 64743
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by Queen K »

I'm sitting on the beach at Gyro today, balefully peering out towards what would be Peachland if it weren't for the smoke.
It's still Peachland, it's just cloaked in smoke.
And it is September 16th, my favourite time of the year.
Want your bags of leaves gone? Put a "free" sign on them out by the road so people can grab them.
User avatar
JagXKR
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2925
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am

Re: Diamond Creek Fire

Post by JagXKR »

So the following link says the fire is 12,245ha and is dated Sept 17

http://bcfireinfo.for.gov.bc.ca/ftp/!Pr ... 170917.pdf

The fire info page says 10,983ha and is dated Sept 18

http://bcfireinfo.for.gov.bc.ca/hprScri ... asp?ID=673

Accuracy is not really that good for this fire. More than 1000ha difference. Which one to believe? Does not really matter, just pointing out that the BCWS is maybe not the best at giving accurate info. Either way this is one big fire.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.

Return to “Fire Watch 2017”