Climate change.

[The Green Barbarian]

https://www.castanet.net/news/World/405 ... d-for-mine


So so funny. Poor Germany, listened to the eco terrorists and are now forced to dig MORE coal. This is what you get when you listen to eco terrorists and their messed up myopic agendas.
Put a big big smile on my face.

Yes, the eco terrorists convinced the government that 'the science is settled' and now they're in deep doo doo. Just wait until Canada is in the same boat because terrorists think gas is evil and electricity is infinitely available. This will not end well.

Screenshot 2023-01-11 083455.jpg

[Jlabute]

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34995221/

World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity, Non-fossil Component, Anthropogenic Fossil Component, and Emissions (1750-2018)

In other words, man-made climate change DOES NOT exist. It is a fraud.

The late Canadian climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball, said years ago that the IPCC was purposely directed to investigate only the effect of manmade emissions of CO2 on the climate. He said you would not be able to tell that effect without also knowing what the contribution to the global total came from natural emissions. That omitted research allowed scientists to postulate the AGW theory and then blame all recent climate change on manmade emissions.



http://www.climate-change-theory.com/

[The Green Barbarian]

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34995221/

World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity, Non-fossil Component, Anthropogenic Fossil Component, and Emissions (1750-2018)

In other words, man-made climate change DOES NOT exist. It is a fraud.

The late Canadian climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball, said years ago that the IPCC was purposely directed to investigate only the effect of manmade emissions of CO2 on the climate. He said you would not be able to tell that effect without also knowing what the contribution to the global total came from natural emissions. That omitted research allowed scientists to postulate the AGW theory and then blame all recent climate change on manmade emissions.

So sad to hear that Dr. Ball has passed away. The world of climatology has lost a true hero, a person who wasn't afraid to stand up to the fake "consensus" and the pure human scum pushing the man-made climate change fraud. Those are big shoes to fill all right, as there still is so much work to be done to keep fighting the good fight against all the horrid scum out there still pushing the man-made climate change fraud.

[Glacier]

Yes, the eco terrorists convinced the government that 'the science is settled' and now they're in deep doo doo. Just wait until Canada is in the same boat because terrorists think gas is evil and electricity is infinitely available. This will not end well.

Screenshot 2023-01-11 083455.jpg

Fun fact: The so called "renewables" is largely made up of wood pellets and not wind and solar. Worse, they're increasingly diverting wood that would otherwise be used make 2x4s into power plants.

BTW, I fully support the right of environmentalists to protest, including to the point of civil disobedience (not ax attacks or other forms of violence). But ironically, the leftists on Castanet who also support environmentalist protests came unglued over the Trucker protest. Hypocrites!

[The Green Barbarian]

Fun fact: The so called "renewables" is largely made up of wood pellets and not wind and solar. Worse, they're increasingly diverting wood that would otherwise be used make 2x4s into power plants.

Perhaps the silver lining there will be that they will run out of wood to make paper bags and paper straws, and we can go back to being sensible and using plastic bags and plastic straws again.

Amazing to me the cycles - in the 1980's all the stores switched to plastic bags because we were "saving the trees" and now here we are, back to using these paper bags again that break when they get the slightest bit wet and spill all of your groceries on the ground in the parking lot. What idiots were behind such stupid bad decisions??

BTW, I fully support the right of environmentalists to protest, including to the point of civil disobedience (not ax attacks or other forms of violence). But ironically, the leftists on Castanet who also support environmentalist protests came unglued over the Trucker protest. Hypocrites!

Only their protests are "justified". All protests that don't align with their warped regressive world view must be put down as soon as possible. That's the way it is. It's like when their guy gets caught with classified materials, it's totally cool, just don't let anyone on the other side of the political spectrum make the same mistake.

[Spiff]

. . .

BTW, I fully support the right of environmentalists to protest, including to the point of civil disobedience (not ax attacks or other forms of violence). But ironically, the leftists on Castanet who also support environmentalist protests came unglued over the Trucker protest. Hypocrites!

I'm glad to have your support on this.

"Greta Thunberg joins 'Pinkey' and 'Brain' tunnel protest"

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64261197

And in a correction of my ways with the truckers, under the Health section thread "Nurses shortage" I'm campaigning for support towards the return of unvaxinated healthcare workers to their jobs if you wish to join me there.

In fact, I'll support the return to work of unvaxinated everybody.

[Jlabute]

Great Barrier Reef coral is the highest it has ever been in the last 36 years.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/01/13/ ... s-funding/

[JagXKR]

But you can't quote that site without the eco terrorists here trying to say it's bunk.
So here is the actual study
https://www.aims.gov.au/monitoring-grea ... ry-2021-22

In 2022, widespread recovery has led to the highest coral cover recorded by the LTMP in the Northern and Central GBR, largely due to increases in the fast-growing Acropora corals, which are the dominant group of corals on the GBR and have been largely responsible previous changes in hard coral cover.

On the Central and Northern GBR, region-wide hard coral cover reached 33% and 36%, respectively; the highest level recorded in the past 36 years of monitoring.

https://oceaninfo.com/compare/hard-coral-vs-soft-coral/

Hard corals are known as the building blocks of coral reefs, with their dead skeletons becoming anchoring points for new corals, both hard and soft.

So the most important, hard coral, is the highest since the LTMP began.
The eco terrorists continue with their lies and deception. They have no shame in their dishonest messed up dogma.

[JLives]

Great Barrier Reef coral is the highest it has ever been in the last 36 years.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/01/13/ ... s-funding/

Thats a terrible article. Where have you snorkeled? Have you seen it for yourself? Mexico is decimated. Off the east coast. Everything is grey. Cozumel still has somewhat nice reefs but you can see them dying too.

I'd like to see the reports from divers and not propaganda blogs.

[JagXKR]

And just as I predicted....

But you can't quote that site without the eco terrorists here trying to say it's bunk.
So here is the actual study
https://www.aims.gov.au/monitoring-grea ... ry-2021-22

[spooker]

Great Barrier Reef coral is the highest it has ever been in the last 36 years.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/01/13/ ... s-funding/

I always find it funny what is left out of the articles posted on this blog ...

However, the experts warned any recovery could be reversed as coral continues to be bleached as a result of heat stress caused by global warming.

AIMS’ Dr Paul Hardisty said: “Every summer the reef is at risk of temperature stress, bleaching and potentially mortality and our understanding of how the ecosystem responds to that is still developing.”

AIMS monitoring program team leader Dr Mike Emslie added: “The increasing frequency of warming ocean temperatures and the extent of mass bleaching events highlights the critical threat climate change poses to all reefs, particularly while crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks and tropical cyclones are also occurring.

https://news.yahoo.com/great-barrier-re ... 14055.html

[JagXKR]

I always find it funny what is left out of the articles posted on this blog ...

However, the experts warned any recovery could be reversed as coral continues to be bleached as a result of heat stress caused by global warming.

AIMS’ Dr Paul Hardisty said: “Every summer the reef is at risk of temperature stress, bleaching and potentially mortality and our understanding of how the ecosystem responds to that is still developing.”

AIMS monitoring program team leader Dr Mike Emslie added: “The increasing frequency of warming ocean temperatures and the extent of mass bleaching events highlights the critical threat climate change poses to all reefs, particularly while crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks and tropical cyclones are also occurring.

https://news.yahoo.com/great-barrier-re ... 14055.html

And I find it funny that the eco crowd will stil fixate on opinion rather than fact. The yahoo article is a biased report. Fixated on the eco terrorist use of fear to get people to read the article. When given the actual report link the eco terrorist will not report the whole truth but the biased fear mongering dogma to generate fear and therefore generate advertising. Simple psychology, fear is more attention getting than calm.
BTW bleaching has been occurring for millennia, just like glaciers disappearing and reforming. But if the sheeple knew this the fear is not generated and the advertising revenue goes down...way way down.
My link is the whole article not some edited form with fear as it's rooted dogma. Reefs go back 160 million years and in those times the Earths temperature has been much much warmer than today. The eco terrorists continue to talk about reef bleaching due to warmer temperatures. So does that mean that the reefs were completely bleached back when it was much much warmer....? Nope, they thrived. They have been non-static as the Earths temperature has been non-static. That is very very important. Static equals stagnant equals eventual death. The Earth is dynamic and the environment is also dynamic which means life.
https://today.oregonstate.edu/news/cora ... sic-period

The research also suggests that given their long history, coral-algal partnerships have endured numerous climate change events in their long history, meaning that at least some are likely to survive modern-day global climate change as well.

“Over all of those millions of years, partnerships have faced major hurdles and managed to bounce back,” LaJeunesse said. “The fossil record shows today’s reef-building corals, like the algae, arose around 160 million years ago. Finding that the origin of the symbionts corresponds to that of their hosts implies that the partnership was one of the major reasons for the diversification and success of modern corals.”

[spooker]

And I find it funny that the eco crowd will stil fixate on opinion rather than fact. The yahoo article is a biased report. Fixated on the eco terrorist use of fear to get people to read the article. When given the actual report link the eco terrorist will not report the whole truth but the biased fear mongering dogma to generate fear and therefore generate advertising. Simple psychology, fear is more attention getting than calm.
BTW bleaching has been occurring for millennia, just like glaciers disappearing and reforming. But if the sheeple knew this the fear is not generated and the advertising revenue goes down...way way down.
My link is the whole article not some edited form with fear as it's rooted dogma. Reefs go back 160 million years and in those times the Earths temperature has been much much warmer than today. The eco terrorists continue to talk about reef bleaching due to warmer temperatures. So does that mean that the reefs were completely bleached back when it was much much warmer....? Nope, they thrived. They have been non-static as the Earths temperature has been non-static. That is very very important. Static equals stagnant equals eventual death. The Earth is dynamic and the environment is also dynamic which means life.

I am glad that they feel some of the existing reefs could survive current changes ... especially since they noted this in that article:

In general corals are bleaching about 4.5 times as frequently as they did in 1980, with severe bleaching events now occurring about every six years instead of every 25 or 30 years.

Changes are occurring and we aren't necessarily certain how that will effect other systems since all life in interconnected on the planet ... it's good that the research is continuing and that we are connecting more dots ...

[The Green Barbarian]

[seewood]

Kind of sums up the reality of climate change : https://twitter.com/hashtag/climatechan ... htag_click

I'd love to see this video clip shown at high schools and universities.