Climate change.

[Jlabute]

So NSW’s premier, Chris Minns, thinks social media platforms like Meta should prevent climate activists from broadcasting their protests.

LOL - "climate activist" - yet another Orwellian term that means nothing.

The more we can force democratisation on media of all types, the better placed we’ll be to fight both climate change and fascism.

Or in this case, fighting the losers pushing the man-made climate change fraud, and the fascism that they are forcing down everyone's throats.

Climate activists have shown themselves to be uneducated terrorists.

Yup, it is all a fraud pushed by unelected globalists. Fascists who want to take power against the people's will.

Sweden though has opened the door to nuclear power and cheap energy. They tell Britain to follow. The premise of such an urgent call is still wrong.

https://www.netzerowatch.com/sweden-can ... ld-follow/

[Spiff]

This is new, and I got the message. So okay, I'm in if people here want to play ball. But until then there's just one thing . . ..

Why focusing on “climate change denial” is counterproductive

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 20opinions.

At the end of September, David Malpass, the president of the World Bank, was heavily criticized after failing to acknowledge anthropogenic climate change [henceforth called climate change (1)]. Although he later apologized for and revised his remarks, they sparked a renewed public debate on the existence of climate change deniers and their impact on our transition toward a more sustainable future (2).

We believe that the dichotomous view of climate change “deniers” and climate change “accepters” is not helpful. This way of framing the debate only stymies our path to a zero-carbon future. It does so for three primary reasons. First, it creates an inaccurate picture by overstating the share and importance of climate change deniers for tackling climate change. Second, a focus on climate denialism divides and polarizes society, further preventing constructive engagement with different opinions. Third, it distracts us from concentrating on the more pressing question: how we should tackle climate change, not if. Once we focus on the how, we can begin to understand that support for different solutions to tackle climate change may be contingent on people’s preference for individual freedom. With this understanding in mind, we can offer a constructive path forward.

<snip>

It’s time to give climate “deniers” less attention in the media, in our own private conversations, and in academic discourse. We should instead concentrate on establishing shared responsibility to act on the climate crisis and consider the role of ingrained worldviews on reaching a consensus. Only then will we be able to carry out effective solutions.

[77TA]

I thought this article was about forest fires but stopped reading when I realized it was really about promoting unknown science as fact.

"The incidents of human-triggered wildfires appears to be going down. Lightning strikes, however, are on the rise.

That’s because human-caused climate change..."

Enjoy the narrative reality deniers.

https://www.castanet.net/news/Canada/43 ... ded#433860

[The Green Barbarian]

[The Green Barbarian]

I thought this article was about forest fires but stopped reading when I realized it was really about promoting unknown science as fact.

"The incidents of human-triggered wildfires appears to be going down. Lightning strikes, however, are on the rise.

That’s because human-caused climate change..."

Enjoy the narrative reality deniers.

https://www.castanet.net/news/Canada/43 ... ded#433860

Yup, just more massive loads of BS from science deniers pushing the man-made climate change myth, carbon credits, and the idiotic concept of a "zero carbon future" which is literally the dumbest possible idea ever conceived by stupid men.

[Jlabute]

A prediction made by James Hansen (the father of global warming) in 1989 said the "Westside Highway" would be under water within 30 years.

image-43.png

Come 2019, the highway doesn't look any different.

image-44.png

[The Green Barbarian]

Couldn't have said it better Piers.

[Spiff]

“Hypocrite.”

I couldn't have said it better, Piers.

Capture22.JPG

" . . . worsening . . ." he sees.

So,

Capture24.JPG

Tip . . ..

Yeah, get that app.


https://www.independent.co.uk/life-styl ... 72606.html

[The Green Barbarian]

“Hypocrite.”

I couldn't have said it better, Piers.

This entire post is imbecilic and off topic. Piers is talking about air pollution, not fake fairy tale pollution like CO2 that gullible fools claim is causing some mythical sky genie to get mad and cause tornadoes. Air pollution is very serious and has nothing to do with the man-made climate change alarmist boneheads. Good on Piers for

1. Calling out the climate change hysterics and idiots on TV and
2. Drawing attention to an actual environmental problem, air pollution. Real actual air pollution and not made up stuff.

Keep up the good work Piers!

[Ken7]

I thought this article was about forest fires but stopped reading when I realized it was really about promoting unknown science as fact.

"The incidents of human-triggered wildfires appears to be going down. Lightning strikes, however, are on the rise.

That’s because human-caused climate change..."

Enjoy the narrative reality deniers.

https://www.castanet.net/news/Canada/43 ... ded#433860

Follow the money, Dr Suzuki made mis lifetime telling stories of what was on the agenda.
I saw one the other day relating to the Co2 levels on earth. Our count was something like .04%. In order to sustain plant growth if it is reduced too much plants will not grow.

Are believers aware Co2 is pumped into greenhouses to promote rapid growth??? Are we then missing something???

[Jlabute]

I thought this article was about forest fires but stopped reading when I realized it was really about promoting unknown science as fact.

"The incidents of human-triggered wildfires appears to be going down. Lightning strikes, however, are on the rise.

That’s because human-caused climate change..."

Enjoy the narrative reality deniers.

https://www.castanet.net/news/Canada/43 ... ded#433860

Follow the money, Dr Suzuki made mis lifetime telling stories of what was on the agenda.
I saw one the other day relating to the Co2 levels on earth. Our count was something like .04%. In order to sustain plant growth if it is reduced too much plants will not grow.

Are believers aware Co2 is pumped into greenhouses to promote rapid growth??? Are we then missing something???

Right. Plants are more drought resistant as CO2 increases. I can't imagine CO2 going lower than levels in the 1800's (let alone paying people to invent ways to do it). If the earth is greening today from more abundant CO2, I can just imagine how there is the potential to radically de-green the world by reversing it. Immense die-offs as remaining CO2 sinks in to plants and oceans. I hope mankind never forgets how to create CO2.

CO2 as a control knob or potent greenhouse gas is a theory. Water vapor shares the same absorption spectrum as CO2 and there is a lot more of it. How much does it affect climate no one really knows but the scientific community is split - sorry, not enough data. Just 8000 years ago we had much warmer temperatures and half the CO2. We don't understand the natural forms of warming and all we do today is run models with poor assumptions. You are not missing anything except the climate scams which attack your pocketbook. This fairytale scam costs Canadians thousands of dollars each year in higher insurance rates, taxes, and more. It was Stuart Kirk (honest senior HSBC banker) who lost his job claiming that climate change is not a financial risk.

Follow the money.

[JLives]

Follow the money, Dr Suzuki made mis lifetime telling stories of what was on the agenda.
I saw one the other day relating to the Co2 levels on earth. Our count was something like .04%. In order to sustain plant growth if it is reduced too much plants will not grow.

Are believers aware Co2 is pumped into greenhouses to promote rapid growth??? Are we then missing something???

Right. Plants are more drought resistant as CO2 increases. I can't imagine CO2 going lower than levels in the 1800's (let alone paying people to invent ways to do it). If the earth is greening today from more abundant CO2, I can just imagine how there is the potential to radically de-green the world by reversing it. Immense die-offs as remaining CO2 sinks in to plants and oceans. I hope mankind never forgets how to create CO2.

CO2 as a control knob or potent greenhouse gas is a theory. Water vapor shares the same absorption spectrum as CO2 and there is a lot more of it. How much does it affect climate no one really knows but the scientific community is split - sorry, not enough data. Just 8000 years ago we had much warmer temperatures and half the CO2. We don't understand the natural forms of warming and all we do today is run models with poor assumptions. You are not missing anything except the climate scams which attack your pocketbook. This fairytale scam costs Canadians thousands of dollars each year in higher insurance rates, taxes, and more. It was Stuart Kirk (honest senior HSBC banker) who lost his job claiming that climate change is not a financial risk.

Follow the money.

I followed it. It doesn't lead to climate scientists. For sure capitalist scumbags will try to profit off it but that has zero to do with the science.

[rustled]

Follow the money, Dr Suzuki made mis lifetime telling stories of what was on the agenda.
I saw one the other day relating to the Co2 levels on earth. Our count was something like .04%. In order to sustain plant growth if it is reduced too much plants will not grow.

Are believers aware Co2 is pumped into greenhouses to promote rapid growth??? Are we then missing something???

Right. Plants are more drought resistant as CO2 increases. I can't imagine CO2 going lower than levels in the 1800's (let alone paying people to invent ways to do it). If the earth is greening today from more abundant CO2, I can just imagine how there is the potential to radically de-green the world by reversing it. Immense die-offs as remaining CO2 sinks in to plants and oceans. I hope mankind never forgets how to create CO2.

CO2 as a control knob or potent greenhouse gas is a theory. Water vapor shares the same absorption spectrum as CO2 and there is a lot more of it. How much does it affect climate no one really knows but the scientific community is split - sorry, not enough data. Just 8000 years ago we had much warmer temperatures and half the CO2. We don't understand the natural forms of warming and all we do today is run models with poor assumptions. You are not missing anything except the climate scams which attack your pocketbook. This fairytale scam costs Canadians thousands of dollars each year in higher insurance rates, taxes, and more. It was Stuart Kirk (honest senior HSBC banker) who lost his job claiming that climate change is not a financial risk.

Follow the money.

Exactly. The "green" goldrush continues apace, trampling the environment and the poor while exploiting the gullibility of those who believe "the science" is showing whatever the shysters are currently hawking.

[Jlabute]

… This fairytale scam costs Canadians thousands of dollars each year in higher insurance rates, taxes, and more. It was Stuart Kirk (honest senior HSBC banker) who lost his job claiming that climate change is not a financial risk.

Follow the money

I followed it. It doesn't lead to climate scientists. For sure capitalist scumbags will try to profit off it but that has zero to do with the science.

Sure it leads to climate scientists. Liberal employed climate scientist scumbags create absurd models that in no way reflect real-life observation, so that the Government and big corporations can push insane energy policies. CanESM5 in no way reflects reality but is used by insurance companies to assume higher amounts of risk, or used by government to push multiple, higher carbon taxes. The results of these ridiculous models spawn climate predictions that are always in the news.

IMG_0065.jpeg

[JLives]

I followed it. It doesn't lead to climate scientists. For sure capitalist scumbags will try to profit off it but that has zero to do with the science.

Sure it leads to climate scientists. Liberal employed climate scientist scumbags create absurd models that in no way reflect real-life observation, so that the Government and big corporations can push insane energy policies. CanESM5 in no way reflects reality but is used by insurance companies to assume higher amounts of risk, or used by government to push multiple, higher carbon taxes. The results of these ridiculous models spawn climate predictions that are always in the news.


IMG_0065.jpeg

Climate scientists operate world wide. Many countries. And many fields. Both privately and publicly funded. Some have been hired to disprove Climate change but were unable too once actually doing the research. And none of them are high fallutin rich people. They're nerds in a lab.