Acceptance of nuclear power

[A.PRIMES254]

turned 180 from a few years ago.more and more countries (Canada included)embrace the nuclear power source.France contemplating to build 14 new nuclear power plants

https://www.voicesofnuclear.org/china-1 ... -15-years/

and the list goes on

https://energy.utexas.edu/news/nuclear- ... -emissions

https://twitter.com/quakes99







https://www.castanet.net/news/Business/ ... ing#414034

[seewood]

A power source not dependant on weather.

[Jlabute]

Make it so #1. I'd rather live 1km from a nuclear plant than 1km from turbines and fields of solar panels.

[alanjh595]

I would rather live 1 km from a hydro electric dam.

[the truth]

Make it so #1. I'd rather live 1km from a nuclear plant than 1km from turbines and fields of solar panels.

what can go wrong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima ... r_disaster

[alanjh595]

Fukushima was a freak accident caused by an earthquake. Canada does not have such earthquakes.

Canada can provide a safe and feasible location to support nuclear power plants.

[Jlabute]

Fukushima was a freak accident caused by an earthquake, followed by a Tsunami, followed by a flood inside the reactor with the diesel backup generator situated below sea level. It is safe. No one died as a direct result of radiation.

[GordonH]

impo nuclear power is the next logical direction for both BC Hydro & Fortis to go in, since there probably isn’t any more rivers in BC to dam.

[Bsuds]

Fukushima was a freak accident caused by an earthquake. Canada does not have such earthquakes.

Canada can provide a safe and feasible location to support nuclear power plants.

BC alone has 5 major fault lines and could have an earthquake at any time.

It's just a matter of time until the "Big' one!

[alanjh595]

Fukushima was a freak accident caused by an earthquake. Canada does not have such earthquakes.

Canada can provide a safe and feasible location to support nuclear power plants.

BC alone has 5 major fault lines and could have an earthquake at any time.

It's just a matter of time until the "Big' one!

That's true and that makes BC a poor choice for a location but, there is the rest of canada that is in desperate need of cheap electric power.

[Bsuds]

That's true and that makes BC a poor choice for a location but, there is the rest of canada that is in desperate need of cheap electric power.

Let them eat cake!

[alanjh595]

That's true and that makes BC a poor choice for a location but, there is the rest of canada that is in desperate need of cheap electric power.

Let them eat cake!

Weellll, they are burning coal to bake that cake.

[Jlabute]

France is funding 6, plus plans for 8 more nuclear plants. France is telling Europe to throw weight behind nuclear. France has the cleanest and cheapest electricity.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... r-reactors

[seewood]

France has the cleanest and cheapest electricity.

I thought Norway , 95% hydro, was the cheapest and France not far behind them.
Most expensive Denmark...windy power.

[Jlabute]

France has the cleanest and cheapest electricity.

I thought Norway , 95% hydro, was the cheapest and France not far behind them.
Most expensive Denmark...windy power.

You’re right, Norway has cheaper power using mostly hydro. Hydro is great where you can do it.