Judge removes key legal hurdle for Trump’s plan to trim federal workforce with deferred resignations

[Castanet News]

A federal judge on Wednesday removed a key legal hurdle stalling President Donald Trump ’s plan to downsize the federal workforce with a deferred resignation...

[Connie65]

Paid off?

[WinkDinkerson]

Paid off?

More likely threatened ...

[Tack]

"Lawfare" a disturbing comment and Trump works to make the courts and judges enemies that he can prosecute at his will.

[bidwell2]

Have a gander at the DOGE website. It's a marketplace for 'meme coins' and t-shirts. Elon Musk is a truly disturbing narcissist. He's laughing at everyone with his silly antics and thumbing his nose at Trump. Hopefully they both go down together.

[online buy]

Still people here cheering this fascist on in Penticton, same people trashing our leader and celebrating UCP hate. Luckily most Canadians can be counted on.

[Matt_Baker]

Lol "hate"... Only hate I see are the leftist comments on here.

Our federal government needs cleaned up like this.

"lawfare" is a great term. The legal system is one of the of most rotten components of colonialism.

Everyone is so emotional right now. Just give this administration 8 years and we'll all have a much better quality of life. Patience young grasshoppers.

[Nedroj]

"Lawfare" a disturbing comment and Trump works to make the courts and judges enemies that he can prosecute at his will.

Odd comment about an article that stated the Judge (appointed by Democrat Bill Clinton) ruled in favour of Trump's buyout plan citing the Unions were not directly affected and therefore dont have a legal standing to challenge it.

right from the article:

U.S. District Judge George O’Toole Jr. in Boston found that the unions weren’t directly affected, so they didn't have legal standing to challenge the program, commonly described as a buyout. O'Toole was nominated by former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat.

[Tack]

"Lawfare" a disturbing comment and Trump works to make the courts and judges enemies that he can prosecute at his will.

Odd comment about an article that stated the Judge (appointed by Democrat Bill Clinton) ruled in favour of Trump's buyout plan citing the Unions were not directly affected and therefore dont have a legal standing to challenge it.

right from the article:

U.S. District Judge George O’Toole Jr. in Boston found that the unions weren’t directly affected, so they didn't have legal standing to challenge the program, commonly described as a buyout. O'Toole was nominated by former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat.

Yes I'm aware of those comments and the article. I was pointing out the slow transition of terminology to make everyone seem like the enemy of Trump so he can work towards prosecuting those he does not agree with.

And the trained seals keep clapping away for him

[Nedroj]

Odd comment about an article that stated the Judge (appointed by Democrat Bill Clinton) ruled in favour of Trump's buyout plan citing the Unions were not directly affected and therefore dont have a legal standing to challenge it.

right from the article:

Yes I'm aware of those comments and the article. I was pointing out the slow transition of terminology to make everyone seem like the enemy of Trump so he can work towards prosecuting those he does not agree with.

And the trained seals keep clapping away for him

Thats a pretty far stretch to reach that conclusion. Especially so when the democrats spent 4 years trying to prosecute Trump and that all failed with appeals and most charges being completely dropped.

[Old Sailor]

Thats a pretty far stretch to reach that conclusion. Especially so when the democrats spent 4 years trying to prosecute Trump and that all failed with appeals and most charges being completely dropped.

My understanding is many of those charges have just been delayed until he is no longer POTUS or dies whichever comes first.

He is getting older by the day.

[Nedroj]

Thats a pretty far stretch to reach that conclusion. Especially so when the democrats spent 4 years trying to prosecute Trump and that all failed with appeals and most charges being completely dropped.

My understanding is many of those charges have just been delayed until he is no longer POTUS or dies whichever comes first.

He is getting older by the day.

Special counsel's last criminal case against Trump dismissed

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gvd7kxxj5o


According to CNN politics The "Hush Money" charges have been appealed
The "Classified Documents" charges, well that entire case was dismissed
So was the "Election interference" Charges, Case dismissed
The last trial is the "Fulton County" one and most of the charges against Trump have been dismissed and/or thrown right out. This trial is currently paused indefinitely while the judges rules on whether or not Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis will be disqualified

[Old Sailor]

Maybe read the whole article as they can be brought again which is what my comment was!

From the article...
"The cases were dismissed "without prejudice", meaning charges could be refiled after Trump finishes his second term as president."

[Tack]

Yes I'm aware of those comments and the article. I was pointing out the slow transition of terminology to make everyone seem like the enemy of Trump so he can work towards prosecuting those he does not agree with.

And the trained seals keep clapping away for him

Thats a pretty far stretch to reach that conclusion. Especially so when the democrats spent 4 years trying to prosecute Trump and that all failed with appeals and most charges being completely dropped.

Only a far stretch if you ignore all of Trump's statements and buildup on this, especially some of the most recent.