Giant hockey stick must go
Planned ski resort defaults
Spec tax brings in $82M
MPs to take part in inquiry
Activist jumps bail
Dragon's charges dropped
World's largest iceberg
Former diplomat a spy?
Burgum ends bid
A robotaxi crash cover-up
Harvard muzzled team
BC biotech stock surges
Too little too late for Blazers
Rockets fall to T-Birds
Warriors streak hits 5
Thought it was 'obvious'
Jordan crashes Ferrari
Dua splits with beau
The Bible... literally?
-
don_pepe
- Newbie
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mar 11th, 2010, 8:14 pm
Re: The Bible... literally?
As for records and documents, if there were any they would be of more significance than the Dead Sea scrolls as they would have been from mainstream Judaism rather than a fringe group and would be better known.
-
tryscotty
- Fledgling
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Aug 29th, 2008, 10:50 pm
Re: The Bible... literally?
don_pepe wrote:As for records and documents, if there were any they would be of more significance than the Dead Sea scrolls as they would have been from mainstream Judaism rather than a fringe group and would be better known.
Exactly my point ,thank you. In other words there is no claim to the linage to King David, Jesus, Moses or anyone from that time. The ones who say such things are making it up and creating so called evidence. See ya'll next subject.
-
steven lloyd
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 20393
- Joined: Dec 1st, 2004, 7:38 pm
Re: The Bible... literally?
tryscotty wrote: See ya'll next subject.
Promises, promises - and still no links
I once lived just a stone's throw away from a family who all died of mysterious head injuries.
-
tryscotty
- Fledgling
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Aug 29th, 2008, 10:50 pm
Re: The Bible... literally?
Promises, promises - and still no links
Some well know and respected publications don't have everything online. They may have it somewhere I just don't know where. You can go to about any library and find it. I did give you pg numbers and book titles. I've seen it so I don't need to go to the library. You should. I could post wikipedia links but I don't consider them a reliable source nor all the Bible based websites that comment on the very things were discussing. The reference works are well renowned and trusted, just no links online. Old school research is in order if you really care too.
Some well know and respected publications don't have everything online. They may have it somewhere I just don't know where. You can go to about any library and find it. I did give you pg numbers and book titles. I've seen it so I don't need to go to the library. You should. I could post wikipedia links but I don't consider them a reliable source nor all the Bible based websites that comment on the very things were discussing. The reference works are well renowned and trusted, just no links online. Old school research is in order if you really care too.
-
steven lloyd
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 20393
- Joined: Dec 1st, 2004, 7:38 pm
Re: The Bible... literally?
Yes, the Bible is certainly well known for its historical accuracy. Thanks for that
I once lived just a stone's throw away from a family who all died of mysterious head injuries.
-
GordonH
- Сварливий старий мерзотник
- Posts: 38012
- Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm
Re: The Bible... literally?
steven lloyd wrote:Yes, the Bible is certainly well known for its historical accuracy. Thanks for that
It's not........ damn that was my corner post of history...........
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests. I am an old cantankerousness grump that happens to be very opinionated.