Castanet

I seen that too, but what I saw was, that the couple was loading their 2 cars with their 2 kids, 2 dogs, 2 suitcases for each. I am sure that they took 2 credit cards, passports, and 2 airplane tickets for each pair.
I don't know for sure, but I bet they doubled up on their insurance for their house, the 2 jet skis, and the dock and boat coverage.

The average thickness of sedimentary rocks around the world in the continents that were supposedly deposited by Noah’s flood is about 1,800 meters). If just 1 percent of this thickness represents fossil remains of marine animals that were alive at the same time during Noah’s flood, then the whole world would have been covered with 59 feet of living marine animals, such as clams, snails, corals, trilobites, and sponges. That many animals living at the same time during that single year would have been impossible. The value of 1 percent is not unreasonable when some limestone layers are composed of nearly 100 percent fossils. Even if 0.1 percent of the sedimentary rock thickness contained all marine animals that were alive at the same time in the year of Noah’s flood, that means that the whole world would have been covered with 5.9 feet of animals, and that still is too many animals.
The impossible numbers of fossils of coccoliths , radiolarians, and sea lilies are illustrative of this fact. Moreover, if only one out of 10,000 animals living on the land are preserved as fossils in the sedimentary rocks deposited by Noah’s flood, then Noah would have had no space in which he, his family, and cattle could have existed with all these creatures living at the same time, particularly if tens of thousands of huge dinosaurs were alive when Noah lived prior to the flood. So that youtube video there is a bunch of nonsense and fossils actually disprove the Flood.

I almost did not post it due to the fact that the comment section was turned off, to me it shows they are not open to discussion.

what I did find interesting was the comments on fossils not showing evolution but showing death instead.

the lack of fossils showing intermediate species is something that i have been saying for years.

Except there is no shortage of intermediate fossils.

Omnitheo wrote:Except there is no shortage of intermediate fossils.

According to the video the few suspected transitional fossils believed to show possible evolution have been discredited

cutter7 wrote:I almost did not post it due to the fact that the comment section was turned off, to me it shows they are not open to discussion.

what I did find interesting was the comments on fossils not showing evolution but showing death instead.

the lack of fossils showing intermediate species is something that i have been saying for years.

I know this won't change your opinion. I know it won't make you question your beliefs. You probably won't even click the link.
Please though, stop spreading the lies. You just don't know anything about evolution.

https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/_0_0/lines_03

cutter7 wrote:

Omnitheo wrote:Except there is no shortage of intermediate fossils.

According to the video the few suspected transitional fossils believed to show possible evolution have been discredited

Literally every fossil is transitional, as species don’t stop evolving. There are fossils showing intermediate stages between ancient clades and living species today. Archeopteryx and man other species showing the evolution of dinosaurs to birds.

Fossils showing snakes with vestigial legs. The emergence of shoulders in fish right up to developing legs. Like I said, there is no shortage of fossils being discovered.

Is this enough evidence for you?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IoTkguzRaCU

Nope. And right off the hop in that video it looks like they’re about to sacrifice a goat, lol.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/noah3 ... discovery/

Do it in your own words. I am not watching another creatard video, the first one was dumb enough.

youjustcomplain wrote:

cutter7 wrote:I almost did not post it due to the fact that the comment section was turned off, to me it shows they are not open to discussion.

what I did find interesting was the comments on fossils not showing evolution but showing death instead.

the lack of fossils showing intermediate species is something that i have been saying for years.

I know this won't change your opinion. I know it won't make you question your beliefs. You probably won't even click the link.
Please though, stop spreading the lies. You just don't know anything about evolution.

https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/_0_0/lines_03

Meh, wrong - I am not afraid to learn

Your article uses words and phrases "seems" and "we would expect to see" that tell us they are guessing based on what they see.
Go ahead believe somebodies guesses


I will continue to believe in intelligent design until somebody can explain how life began from rocks and dirt

My guess? It cant be done

cutter7 wrote:Meh, wrong - I am not afraid to learn

Your article uses words and phrases "seems" and "we would expect to see" that tell us they are guessing based on what they see.
Go ahead believe somebodies guesses


I will continue to believe in intelligent design until somebody can explain how life began from rocks and dirt

My guess? It cant be done

Maybe there was something wrong with my link? It was about transitional forms, and the fossils left behind. So many christians seem to try to toss out all of evolution by making a completely false claim that there are no transitional fossils. I've provided you a link that explains some, and the response returned from you is that you'd rather keep your head in the sand because of something completely unrelated to transitional fossils?

What are you looking for exactly? If I could go back 100 million years and run a time lapse for you so you could watch it all on your screen, would you believe it to be true then? Or would you still pretend it's not real just so you can fear your god?

There are many humans today with autosomal dominant diseases , I can picture your great grand children trying to sell it as evolution.

cutter7 wrote:I will continue to believe in intelligent design until somebody can explain how life began from rocks and dirt

My guess? It cant be done

Except life didn’t begin from rocks and dirt. That is not evolution, and no scientists are claiming such. Your misunderstanding is not an argument. It would be like you saying:
“I will continue to believe the sun is god until someone can explain how fire can burn in space”.

removed