The definition of mandatory

Post Reply
LordEd
Guru
Posts: 9481
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2008, 9:22 am

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by LordEd »

Thinktank wrote:But this thread explains the circumstances that the product could cause cancer.
https://forums.castanet.net/viewtopic.php?f=95&t=86813
^ there
The circumstance it could cause cancer in is during a fictional court case?

Your evidence is a fictional court case that you wrote up. Something that has not happened... and you've already written up an fictional legal defense to the fictional harm caused by fibres you insist are proven cancerous.

Thinktank wrote:I don't really have time for too much nonsense
But you had time to write up a fictional court case and further create materials all based upon the premise that these particular mask fibres are not only harmful but fatal...

Image
Health forum: Health, well-being, medicine, aging, digital currency enslavement, depopulation conspiracy.

If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
User avatar
Thinktank
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 10822
Joined: Nov 5th, 2010, 6:21 am

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by Thinktank »

LordEd wrote:The circumstance it could cause cancer in is during a fictional court case?


Yeah okay I get it - forums are fun.[icon_lol2.gif]

I wouldn't wear that mask, but I hope some of the people on this forum wear it. I know they won't though.


https://www.howardlawpc.com/files/10-_t ... failed.pdf
True stories of corporations that knew their products were dangerous, sometimes deadly ^
....because the corporation giving the mask free, knows the fibres go into people's lungs.
WHEN WILL WESTERN WAR PIGS WIND THIS UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE DOWN?????????????

"Fisman's Fraud" - most important Canadian book of 2024. covid fear tactics of fraudulent scientist David Fisman - misinformation distributed by U of Toronto researchers.
LordEd
Guru
Posts: 9481
Joined: Apr 3rd, 2008, 9:22 am

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by LordEd »

Thinktank wrote:I wouldn't wear that mask, but I hope some of the people on this forum wear it. I know they won't though.
You hope a painful lung cancer death upon others?

Thinktank wrote:....because the corporation giving the mask free, knows the fibres go into people's lungs.
Repeating the same thing over and over doesn't make it true. It doesn't eliminate the question of what are they made of, and why do they cause cancer? Pretty sure they aren't asbestos based.
Health forum: Health, well-being, medicine, aging, digital currency enslavement, depopulation conspiracy.

If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
User avatar
mexi cali
Guru
Posts: 9696
Joined: May 5th, 2009, 2:48 pm

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by mexi cali »

Thinktank wrote:
LordEd wrote:Right. Don't question that the materials are cancerous. It was posted here by somebody so it must be true.


I don't really have time for too much nonsense. But this thread explains the circumstances that the product could cause cancer.
https://forums.castanet.net/viewtopic.php?f=95&t=86813
^ there

I myself, did not know the mask was "disposable."
I wore it three times, (ten minutes each time) and I thought it could be worn many more times when I noticed the fibres.

If a kid plays soccer with these masks - it should be a criminal offence. That's my honest opinion.

Ten minutes shopping - one time only - I'd never do it. Even if someone paid me $500.
..


Looks too me like you do. What is this, the 20th post about mask fibers?
Praise the lord and pass the ammunition
common_sense_guy
Übergod
Posts: 1707
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2017, 12:40 pm

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by common_sense_guy »

Thinktank wrote:
Thinktank wrote:fibres ...cancer.

LordEd wrote:evidence ....

common_sense_guy wrote:Seriously...


How many times should I post my amazing photo of the cheap ten cent mask, showing the fibres?
If they go into your lungs - and it's guaranteed with the free masks- you get cancer.


wow.gif

Guaranteed to give you a cancer? Where did you go to medical school
You don't learn when you are talking. You can only learn while you're listening.
User avatar
Symbonite
Lord of the Board
Posts: 4098
Joined: Feb 16th, 2005, 9:30 am

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by Symbonite »

I just came back from Banff a few weeks ago...

they have a mandatory mask rule for inside establishments as well as outdoors on the street. I would say the complience is about 99.5% of people i saw during that time (3days) and people are fined by bylaw if not wearing a mask (which I saw bylaw regularly patrolling)

Only time you can have them off is in restaurants.

masks did do double duty to keeping our faces warm in -23c weather.
**Disclaimer: The above statement is in my OPINION only.
User avatar
t76turbo
Generalissimo Postalot
Posts: 974
Joined: Nov 29th, 2007, 9:48 am

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by t76turbo »

Yup , was in Banff 2 months ago and mandatory masks everywhere. Felt odd walking around without one. Didn’t have any with me and businesses weren’t handing them out.
I really like your post, just can’t find the button. I’m part of the fringe minority.
Defund the CBC? You bet, they are part of the spreading hate machine, protecting their captain!
Tfishwood
Newbie
Posts: 70
Joined: Jul 21st, 2013, 10:03 pm

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by Tfishwood »

Went to Kel Superstore yesterday. Sign up mandatory mask. Most wore. Not all. No enforcement.
User avatar
alanjh595
Banned
Posts: 24532
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 5:18 pm

Re: The definition of mandatory

Post by alanjh595 »

Tfishwood wrote:Went to Kel Superstore yesterday. Sign up mandatory mask. Most wore. Not all. No enforcement.


Well....it is a "NO Frills" store.
Bring back the LIKE button.
Post Reply

Return to “Central Okanagan”