650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
- alanjh595
- Banned
- Posts: 24532
- Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 5:18 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
$650 million dollar houses?Vacancyrate wrote:650 million dollar selling price houses made for the average Kelowna citizen on a salary of 46k a year.
650 houses that would be attractive to those that can afford the price, and create 650 houses available to the lower income households, is more like it.
Bring back the LIKE button.
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Nov 18th, 2018, 8:22 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
How are they going to fit 650 housing units on that fairly steep hillside is what I want to know. Also what about the extension of Clement?
Don't Vancouver our Kelowna!
-
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Sep 6th, 2006, 11:07 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
It is interesting to note that the rail trail is not actually on the rail bed until a point just before Dilworth Drive, going east. In fact, not on the rail bed anywhere all the way back to where the trail ends just short of the Rolko entrance between Km. 50 and Km. 51 of the trail.
- GordonH
- Сварливий старий мерзотник
- Posts: 39050
- Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Time will tell if those homes will end up at the bottom of that hillside.bigtimeoperations wrote: How are they going to fit 650 housing units on that fairly steep hillside is what I want to know. Also what about the extension of Clement?
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
-
- Generalissimo Postalot
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Jan 15th, 2017, 4:42 am
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Jul 15th, 2019, 2:18 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Except, nobody has been working that land for ages. Before present times, pretty much all of Kelowna's urban land had been agricultural.Scrobins94 wrote:Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
The same luminaries who are complaining about rezoning of this land would probably cry murder about the housing crisis. Can't have it both ways.
- normaM
- The Pilgrim
- Posts: 38136
- Joined: Sep 18th, 2007, 7:28 am
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
hotter than Hell there, again the area was ruined already. Interesting what will happen with traffic
If there was a Loser contest you'd come in second
- GordonH
- Сварливий старий мерзотник
- Posts: 39050
- Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Light green shading shows ALR lands, that hillside isn’t part of it.Scrobins94 wrote: Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
- Symbonite
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 4098
- Joined: Feb 16th, 2005, 9:30 am
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
I guess people like to see houses than trees as a natural landscape.
no more growing out...terrible will look like Vernon
no more growing out...terrible will look like Vernon
**Disclaimer: The above statement is in my OPINION only.
- Panzer130
- Board Meister
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Sep 19th, 2009, 8:00 am
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Please be cautious bringing facts and details to a castanet forum discussion. You will leave nothing for these folks to belly ache about!!GordonH wrote:Light green shading shows ALR lands, that hillside isn’t part of it.Scrobins94 wrote: Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Apr 21st, 2005, 3:20 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
It may not be under ALR, but leave it as a natural preserve.
-
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Sep 6th, 2006, 11:07 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Well there's the problem. The land is not "natural", it is grosly "modified" by previous human activity. If a hillside like that is not covered with our signature Arrowleaf Balsamroot ("Kelowna daisy") it is wrecked. If it is populated by invasive weeds, it is lost.
ETA: ALR designation and a civic zoning of agricultural are two different things. I'm feel that Kelowna is right up there with such environmentally conscious communities as Ft. St. John in wanting to plow all agricultural zones under the blade of better and higher (alleged) uses.
ETA: ALR designation and a civic zoning of agricultural are two different things. I'm feel that Kelowna is right up there with such environmentally conscious communities as Ft. St. John in wanting to plow all agricultural zones under the blade of better and higher (alleged) uses.
Last edited by occasional thoughts on Apr 25th, 2021, 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8439
- Joined: Mar 24th, 2015, 7:20 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Why? What's so special about it? It's an empty hill that turns into a swamp. Oh my goodness, it's a national treasure!TedD wrote:It may not be under ALR, but leave it as a natural preserve.
- Lady tehMa
- A Peer of the Realm
- Posts: 21697
- Joined: Aug 2nd, 2005, 3:51 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
On the plus side, maybe there is a chance all that development will chase the homeless out of there? I keep waiting for yet another fire caused by transients in that area (it's been so dry). Bad enough they burned down some of the area's heritage . . .
I haven't failed until I quit.
- Urban Cowboy
- Guru
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm
Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn
Yeah because that hillside has so many trees on it.Symbonite wrote:I guess people like to see houses than trees as a natural landscape.
no more growing out...terrible will look like Vernon
“Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost" - Tolkien