650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

User avatar
alanjh595
Banned
Posts: 24532
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 5:18 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by alanjh595 »

Vacancyrate wrote:650 million dollar selling price houses made for the average Kelowna citizen on a salary of 46k a year.
$650 million dollar houses?

650 houses that would be attractive to those that can afford the price, and create 650 houses available to the lower income households, is more like it.
Bring back the LIKE button.
bigtimeoperations
Board Meister
Posts: 515
Joined: Nov 18th, 2018, 8:22 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by bigtimeoperations »

How are they going to fit 650 housing units on that fairly steep hillside is what I want to know. Also what about the extension of Clement?
Don't Vancouver our Kelowna!
occasional thoughts
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2783
Joined: Sep 6th, 2006, 11:07 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by occasional thoughts »

It is interesting to note that the rail trail is not actually on the rail bed until a point just before Dilworth Drive, going east. In fact, not on the rail bed anywhere all the way back to where the trail ends just short of the Rolko entrance between Km. 50 and Km. 51 of the trail.
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39050
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by GordonH »

bigtimeoperations wrote: How are they going to fit 650 housing units on that fairly steep hillside is what I want to know. Also what about the extension of Clement?
Time will tell if those homes will end up at the bottom of that hillside.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
Scrobins94
Generalissimo Postalot
Posts: 862
Joined: Jan 15th, 2017, 4:42 am

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by Scrobins94 »

Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
BC Landlord
Guru
Posts: 8664
Joined: Jul 15th, 2019, 2:18 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by BC Landlord »

Scrobins94 wrote:Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
Except, nobody has been working that land for ages. Before present times, pretty much all of Kelowna's urban land had been agricultural.
The same luminaries who are complaining about rezoning of this land would probably cry murder about the housing crisis. Can't have it both ways.
User avatar
normaM
The Pilgrim
Posts: 38136
Joined: Sep 18th, 2007, 7:28 am

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by normaM »

hotter than Hell there, again the area was ruined already. Interesting what will happen with traffic
If there was a Loser contest you'd come in second
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39050
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by GordonH »

Scrobins94 wrote: Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
Light green shading shows ALR lands, that hillside isn’t part of it.
FE4B5D2F-ADFB-4C4B-A6ED-54CD86DB54C4.jpeg
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
User avatar
Symbonite
Lord of the Board
Posts: 4098
Joined: Feb 16th, 2005, 9:30 am

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by Symbonite »

I guess people like to see houses than trees as a natural landscape.

no more growing out...terrible will look like Vernon
**Disclaimer: The above statement is in my OPINION only.
User avatar
Panzer130
Board Meister
Posts: 616
Joined: Sep 19th, 2009, 8:00 am

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by Panzer130 »

GordonH wrote:
Scrobins94 wrote: Agricultural land. Keep it that way. No exceptions.
Light green shading shows ALR lands, that hillside isn’t part of it.
FE4B5D2F-ADFB-4C4B-A6ED-54CD86DB54C4.jpeg
Please be cautious bringing facts and details to a castanet forum discussion. You will leave nothing for these folks to belly ache about!!
:130:
TedD
Board Meister
Posts: 557
Joined: Apr 21st, 2005, 3:20 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by TedD »

It may not be under ALR, but leave it as a natural preserve.
occasional thoughts
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2783
Joined: Sep 6th, 2006, 11:07 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by occasional thoughts »

Well there's the problem. The land is not "natural", it is grosly "modified" by previous human activity. If a hillside like that is not covered with our signature Arrowleaf Balsamroot ("Kelowna daisy") it is wrecked. If it is populated by invasive weeds, it is lost.

ETA: ALR designation and a civic zoning of agricultural are two different things. I'm feel that Kelowna is right up there with such environmentally conscious communities as Ft. St. John in wanting to plow all agricultural zones under the blade of better and higher (alleged) uses.
Last edited by occasional thoughts on Apr 25th, 2021, 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Even Steven
Guru
Posts: 8439
Joined: Mar 24th, 2015, 7:20 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by Even Steven »

TedD wrote:It may not be under ALR, but leave it as a natural preserve.
Why? What's so special about it? It's an empty hill that turns into a swamp. Oh my goodness, it's a national treasure!
User avatar
Lady tehMa
A Peer of the Realm
Posts: 21697
Joined: Aug 2nd, 2005, 3:51 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by Lady tehMa »

On the plus side, maybe there is a chance all that development will chase the homeless out of there? I keep waiting for yet another fire caused by transients in that area (it's been so dry). Bad enough they burned down some of the area's heritage . . .
I haven't failed until I quit.
User avatar
Urban Cowboy
Guru
Posts: 9555
Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm

Re: 650 Homes for Dilworth Mtn

Post by Urban Cowboy »

Symbonite wrote:I guess people like to see houses than trees as a natural landscape.

no more growing out...terrible will look like Vernon
Yeah because that hillside has so many trees on it. [icon_lol2.gif]
“Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost" - Tolkien
Post Reply

Return to “Central Okanagan”