Castanet

common_sense_guy wrote:What part of the rule of law don't you people understand. Yes he was obviously a drug dealer but the laws are there and you've all known them and they broke the law to do the search plain and simple.

And quite apparently, we have laws now where it is easier to demand a breath sample from anyone driving a vehicle without reasonable cause, but if ya get pulled over with TWENTY SEVEN THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED fentanyl pills......the friggen dog had better sit properly or you can skate. Is our justice system f'd up or what!!!!

cutter7 wrote:What's moronic is believing a cop saying that the smell of air freshener or cologne is grounds to search your vehicle.

Read the article. All are signs of possible drugs in the vehicle, just like wandering all over the road and crossing white lines also gets a cop suspicious.

twobits wrote:

common_sense_guy wrote:What part of the rule of law don't you people understand. Yes he was obviously a drug dealer but the laws are there and you've all known them and they broke the law to do the search plain and simple.

And quite apparently, we have laws now where it is easier to demand a breath sample from anyone driving a vehicle without reasonable cause, but if ya get pulled over with TWENTY SEVEN THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED fentanyl pills......the friggen dog had better sit properly or you can skate. Is our justice system f'd up or what!!!!

yes it is...........

LOL all u weed smoking liberals here kill me this cop does a fantastic job only to be shot down by a liberal judge whom is wrong in my opinion and its like your celebrating the fact this scum bag got off I do not understand your thinking at all

ninetyninepct wrote:

cutter7 wrote:What's moronic is believing a cop saying that the smell of air freshener or cologne is grounds to search your vehicle.

Read the article. All are signs of possible drugs in the vehicle, just like wandering all over the road and crossing white lines also gets a cop suspicious.

neither one of those things would have gotten them a search warrant.

The cop used every made up reason he could think of to pull that car over and search.

Speeding? Yea right 27k pills with enough foresight to hide in a secluded spot and he risks speeding?

Cologne and air freshener to mask the smell of pills?
This wasn't marijuana pills don't smell very pungent.

Multiple phones and shaking? Maybe a little nervous but I would wager that cop knew who he was going to pull over and what was in the car BEFORE he even saw him.

Thank You Pierre Trudeau and your Up Charter of Rights and Freedom bill .

cutter7 wrote:The cop used every made up reason he could think of to pull that car over and search.

Speeding? Yea right 27k pills with enough foresight to hide in a secluded spot and he risks speeding?

Apparently the video and judge agreed he WAS speeding.

blueliner wrote:Thank You Pierre Trudeau and your Up Charter of Rights and Freedom bill .

Sections 7 to 14 in the Canadian Constitution.
Since it is in this document, highly unlikely it will be changed or amended by a sitting government.

Reason just look back at what happened with Meech Lake accords.

cutter7 wrote:...but I would wager that cop knew who he was going to pull over and what was in the car BEFORE he even saw him.

Before or after he was passed on the road?

cutter7 wrote:The cop used every made up reason he could think of to pull that car over and search.

Speeding? Yea right 27k pills with enough foresight to hide in a secluded spot and he risks speeding?

Cologne and air freshener to mask the smell of pills?
This wasn't marijuana pills don't smell very pungent.

Multiple phones and shaking? Maybe a little nervous but I would wager that cop knew who he was going to pull over and what was in the car BEFORE he even saw him.

I don't understand your post R U actually defending the scum bag dealer or the cop? R U suggesting the cop planted 27000 pills in the guys van? like what are you trying to spit out here ?

Fancy wrote:

cutter7 wrote:...but I would wager that cop knew who he was going to pull over and what was in the car BEFORE he even saw him.

Before or after he was passed on the road?

Something the lefty's will never be able to answer

Don trump, what I am saying is clear.


The cop had prior information that the driver was carrying drugs. He used every text book excuse he could think of to justify his illegal search and seizure, they do it all the time

cutter7 wrote:Don trump, what I am saying is clear.


The cop had prior information that the driver was carrying drugs. He used every text book excuse he could think of to justify his illegal search and seizure, they do it all the time

So do you think it was just chance the driver happened to come up behind the police officer at that particular time?