M-103

Post Reply
User avatar
What_the
Übergod
Posts: 1413
Joined: Feb 18th, 2017, 1:24 pm

Re: M-103

Post by What_the »

Ugh, having a hard time wading through this thread, it seems our school s have done a dreadful job of teaching history. Disillusioned to the point My mind wanders to original star trek episode with the salt sucking monster - the M-113 creature.
Would so rather be over educated that a knuckle dragging Neanderthal bereft of critical thought and imagination. Although in the case of Neanderthals, that's quite the insult.
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: M-103

Post by the truth »

says it all does it not,we already have hate laws, no need for bill 103 , she is the racist one for trying to pass this bill
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
Ub2
Generalissimo Postalot
Posts: 774
Joined: Mar 22nd, 2009, 8:11 pm

Re: M-103

Post by Ub2 »

Ub2 wrote:M-103 has now officially been passed.

To correct -- my post should have read:

M-103 motion has now officially been passed.
User avatar
MAPearce
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 18762
Joined: Nov 24th, 2009, 5:15 pm

Re: M-103

Post by MAPearce »

A sad day for Canada ......

Vote against Truderp..
Liberalism is a disease like cancer.. Once you get it , you can't get rid of it .
User avatar
fvkasm2x
Guru
Posts: 7266
Joined: Apr 1st, 2007, 3:06 pm

Re: M-103

Post by fvkasm2x »

1) We already have Islamaphobia laws.

They're included in the same laws against ALL hate speech. There isn't a specific law for Jews, Buddhists or any other ONE religion... why this one?

2) So if an atheist makes negative remarks against Islam... is that just not believing, or is that hate speech? How ridiculous.

3) IMO the current state of Islam is the same as Christianity was back when they were killing everyone who didn't think the same as they did and when they were trying to stop everyone who didn't believe in God/Jesus from preventing Christianity from taking over. Men are dominant, gays are evil, there is only 1 real religion... sound familiar? It's a throwback to the dark ages.
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: M-103

Post by the truth »

war is coming people , look what is going on in europe
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
User avatar
MAPearce
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 18762
Joined: Nov 24th, 2009, 5:15 pm

Re: M-103

Post by MAPearce »

We already have Islamaphobia laws.

Now it's ok to spew hatred against Jews , Christians , Buddhists et al...

NOT ask why Muslims feel it's ok to throw gays off roof's , beat their wives OR cut their little girls labia off
swear sensor work around
Wait a minute ..... That's ok .
Last edited by dieseluphammerdown on Mar 23rd, 2017, 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: swear work around
Liberalism is a disease like cancer.. Once you get it , you can't get rid of it .
User avatar
MAPearce
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 18762
Joined: Nov 24th, 2009, 5:15 pm

Re: M-103

Post by MAPearce »

I'm gonna get it for that one .........
Liberalism is a disease like cancer.. Once you get it , you can't get rid of it .
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: M-103

Post by the truth »

MAPearce wrote:
We already have Islamaphobia laws.

Now it's ok to spew hatred against Jews , Christians , Buddhists et al...

NOT ask why Muslims feel it's ok to throw gays off roof's , beat their wives OR cut their little girls labia off ???

!

Wait a minute ..... That's ok .


so if we i,muslims make jew, christian, buddhist jokes its ok
but if someone makes a muslim joke it will be called islamaphobia and will be considered a hate crime are yo f :cuss: kidding me

how can anyone defend this racist bill

islam is the biggest racist thing around from the looks of it
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
Ub2
Generalissimo Postalot
Posts: 774
Joined: Mar 22nd, 2009, 8:11 pm

Re: M-103

Post by Ub2 »

OFF Topic
Last edited by dieseluphammerdown on Mar 23rd, 2017, 6:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Off Topic
User avatar
Glacier
The Pilgrim
Posts: 40406
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: M-103

Post by Glacier »

Most Canadians are against the motion, but it passed by a wide margin anyway. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canad ... bia-motion
http://www.torontosun.com/2017/01/28/ca ... ut-trouble
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: M-103

Post by the truth »

let canadians vote for this 103 bill

simple ,yes or no
lets see how most canadians really feel about this racist bill
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
User avatar
zzontar
Guru
Posts: 8868
Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 9:38 pm

Re: M-103

Post by zzontar »

Posted this on the other thread on the subject:

https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#192511

The motion, known as M-103, became a matter of acrimonious debate, with opponents painting it as a slippery slope towards limiting freedom of speech and even bringing in Sharia law.


For the folks that STILL don't get it, here's what to expect with this Sharia law you're so anxious to bring in:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/ ... op_ten.htm

1. Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.
2. Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhanded—as if domestic violence in any form is acceptable).
3. A Muslim polygamist may simply get rid of one of his undesirable wives.
4. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives.
5. Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners.
6. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man, they have sex, and then this second man divorces her.
7. A woman’s testimony counts half of a man’s testimony.
8. A male gets a double share of the inheritance over that of a female.
9. Husbands are a degree above their wives.
10. A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a dirt field.


The irony is, these guys have a thing against pigs. Regardless, we need nothing of this sort in this country. Nice one, Trudeau.
They say you can't believe everything they say.
User avatar
the truth
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 33556
Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm

Re: M-103

Post by the truth »

zzontar wrote:Posted this on the other thread on the subject:

https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#192511

The motion, known as M-103, became a matter of acrimonious debate, with opponents painting it as a slippery slope towards limiting freedom of speech and even bringing in Sharia law.


For the folks that STILL don't get it, here's what to expect with this Sharia law you're so anxious to bring in:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/ ... op_ten.htm

1. Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.
2. Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhanded—as if domestic violence in any form is acceptable).
3. A Muslim polygamist may simply get rid of one of his undesirable wives.
4. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives.
5. Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners.
6. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man, they have sex, and then this second man divorces her.
7. A woman’s testimony counts half of a man’s testimony.
8. A male gets a double share of the inheritance over that of a female.
9. Husbands are a degree above their wives.
10. A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a dirt field.


The irony is, these guys have a thing against pigs. Regardless, we need nothing of this sort in this country. Nice one, Trudeau.


is everything on this list not a no no in canada, o wait i better not say that its against bill 103 :-X
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
Deean
Fledgling
Posts: 170
Joined: Dec 14th, 2008, 11:15 pm

Re: M-103

Post by Deean »

Ok, but what about ISIS? If we have let terrorists into Canada, or suspect someone, we can no longer speak out for fear of being charged with a hate crime? As in the Barry McGuire song.....I do believe we're on the eve of destruction!
Post Reply

Return to “Canada”