People's Party of Canada

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby JagXKR » Jan 2nd, 2019, 10:19 am

Not quite accurate. He has riding associations set up in all 338 riding's. The candidates need to be chosen/elected for each riding.
There's still time to join and put your name forth.
Thankless job and I haven't the temperament for it, so unfortunately I will decline any nominations. :biggrin:
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.
User avatar
JagXKR
Übergod
 
Posts: 1413
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 1267 posts
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am
Location: Penticton

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby The Green Barbarian » Jan 2nd, 2019, 10:20 am

Omnitheo wrote:
Perhaps if the Conservative party had seen this split coming, they would have been less opposed to electoral reform, and all Canadian parties could have worked together to craft a system that would work for everyone.


This is *bleep*, but what else is new from the alt-left spin-machine. The Conservatives worked with the other parties and came up with recommendations to the "electoral reform" committee, and it was rejected outright by the PM , because the non-partisan committee recommended a system that he didn't want. The Conservatives even demanded a national referendum on the issue and the PM wouldn't go for it, because it would be too "divisive".





https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry ... -1.3962386

and from their website:

We will make every vote count.

We are committed to ensuring that 2015 will be the last federal election conducted under the first-past-the-post voting system.

We will convene an all-party Parliamentary committee to review a wide variety of reforms, such as ranked ballots, proportional representation, mandatory voting, and online voting.

This committee will deliver its recommendations to Parliament. Within 18 months of forming government, we will introduce legislation to enact electoral reform.


https://www.liberal.ca/realchange/electoral-reform/
If you see someone using the term "dimples", you are dealing with a bonehead.

2 people like this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 30942
Likes: 14140 posts
Liked in: 19527 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby Omnitheo » Jan 2nd, 2019, 12:13 pm

The Cons wanted a referendum specifically so they could delay the process and spread disinformation among Canadians to encourage them to vote against it. The election of a party which promised to introduce electoral reform should have been all the referendum that was needed on the matter. And the liberals should have stuck to the promise.
"The Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects all Canadians, every one of us, even when it is uncomfortable."
- Justin Trudeau
User avatar
Omnitheo
Guru
 
Posts: 5433
Likes: 8241 posts
Liked in: 4375 posts
Joined: Jul 19th, 2011, 10:10 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby The Green Barbarian » Jan 2nd, 2019, 12:16 pm

Omnitheo wrote:The Cons wanted a referendum specifically so they could delay the process and spread disinformation among Canadians.


oh good grief. The alt-left spin machine just never stops. Remember, it was the Liberals who killed electoral reform. Not the Conservatives. I realize that this doesn't fit the pro-Liberal narrative, but even the CBC (whose links I posted) said that JT had lied to Canadians about wanting to impose reform. What a joke that somehow the alt-left wants to spin this as a Conservative issue. It's not. But the only real poll that counts is the ballot box, and I hope all of those easily fooled NDP'ers who voted for JT's lies go back to the NDP next election, and abandon the liar JT.
If you see someone using the term "dimples", you are dealing with a bonehead.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 30942
Likes: 14140 posts
Liked in: 19527 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby The Green Barbarian » Jan 2nd, 2019, 12:20 pm

Omnitheo wrote: The election of a party which promised to introduce electoral reform should have been all the referendum that was needed on the matter.


That's a total banana republic attitude. So if a party gets elected that is anti-abortion, would you quietly just accept that that party now has a mandate to get rid of abortion in Canada? No! You would be crying about how that party only received 39% of the popular vote! Of course you would! It's total *bleep*.

The Liberals received 39% of the popular vote. They didn't have a mandate to change our entire system of voting. What they had a mandate to do was to explore electoral reform, and then present it to the public to vote on, as per a normal functioning constitution.

And the liberals should have stuck to the promise.


JT lied. He totally lied. This is apologist bunkum.
If you see someone using the term "dimples", you are dealing with a bonehead.

2 people like this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 30942
Likes: 14140 posts
Liked in: 19527 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby hobbyguy » Jan 2nd, 2019, 5:35 pm

^^ although this is off topic, it actually shows that JT is mature enough to admit an error, and not stick doggedly to an ideological position.

Max has shown that flexibility as well. It is an admirable quality.
Anyone but Scheer - career pols are know nothings.
hobbyguy
Guru
 
Posts: 9512
Likes: 2660 posts
Liked in: 10348 posts
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 9:10 pm

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby The Green Barbarian » Jan 3rd, 2019, 8:41 am

hobbyguy wrote:^^ although this is off topic, it actually shows that JT is mature enough to admit an error, and not stick doggedly to an ideological position.
.


LOL - more spin. Just ridiculous. All this showed was that the Liberals will say anything, and do anything, to get elected, and their sheep will applaud and cheer, and apologize for their actions, no matter how much they lie. Truly sad.
If you see someone using the term "dimples", you are dealing with a bonehead.

3 people like this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 30942
Likes: 14140 posts
Liked in: 19527 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby Pete Podoski » Jan 3rd, 2019, 10:11 am

hobbyguy wrote:^^ although this is off topic, it actually shows that JT is mature enough to admit an error, and not stick doggedly to an ideological position.


Tell that to the young lady in Creston with his paw prints on her butt.

I believe Max's "biker chick" was a willing participant, so his indiscretion was limited to his associating with a woman of questionable character and of course leaving her place more worried about his pants around his ankles than a dossier of critical national security documents.

Image

Thankfully, Canadians who care about judgment and morals and respect for women have Andrew Scheer as a choice on their ballots in October.
#LetHerSpeak

Carrs Landing Viking likes this post.
User avatar
Pete Podoski
Board Meister
 
Posts: 546
Likes: 1244 posts
Liked in: 1190 posts
Joined: Jul 16th, 2018, 9:13 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby hobbyguy » Jan 3rd, 2019, 5:40 pm

*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Jan 4th, 2019, 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Off Topic
Anyone but Scheer - career pols are know nothings.
hobbyguy
Guru
 
Posts: 9512
Likes: 2660 posts
Liked in: 10348 posts
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 9:10 pm

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby Relentless » Jan 4th, 2019, 3:11 pm

Pete Podoski wrote:
Tell that to the young lady in Creston with his paw prints on her butt.

I believe Max's "biker chick" was a willing participant, so his indiscretion was limited to his associating with a woman of questionable character and of course leaving her place more worried about his pants around his ankles than a dossier of critical national security documents.

Image

Thankfully, Canadians who care about judgment and morals and respect for women have Andrew Scheer as a choice on their ballots in October.

Too funny! The guy makes one mistake and all Conservative clan are using this as ammunition to discredit his platform!
Not very mature, Max is still the best man for the job, a true Conservative for sure, regardless is he left his paw prints on any woman.
There is only one party to vote for Oct 2019 - Peoples Party of Canada - Be part of the solution, not the problem! Get Educated!

Catsumi likes this post.
User avatar
Relentless
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2293
Likes: 487 posts
Liked in: 522 posts
Joined: Jan 22nd, 2009, 8:52 pm
Location: Okanagan

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby hobbyguy » Jan 4th, 2019, 6:01 pm

The obvious low brow "Harper nasty" attacks on the PPC are an insult to Canadian's intellect. Meme's and nonsense will get the CONservative nowhere. Max and the PPC are putting forward a serious platform, which the CONservatives under Mr. useless Scheer are not prepared to do.

I may not agree with all that Max has to say or do, but he far more worth listening to than the grim and boring Dimples Scheer - who stands for nothing.

The "Harper nasty" nonsense has no place in serious political discussion, and it just annoys Canadians with an IQ above 3.

If all the CONservatives can do is attack genuinely passionate and committed people like Max, then they deserve to lose. The PPC will rightly push right through that nonsense and destroy the do nothing, stand for nothing CONservatives.
Anyone but Scheer - career pols are know nothings.

Relentless likes this post.
hobbyguy
Guru
 
Posts: 9512
Likes: 2660 posts
Liked in: 10348 posts
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 9:10 pm

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby Catsumi » Jan 7th, 2019, 6:26 pm

Ok, all set and ready to go to war.

Here is Mad Max on tonite's Power Play.

Peeps are so pizzed off at this exisiting excuse for gov't that I fully expect Max to make inroads into the House of Commons. Let's return to sane, sensible and honest government.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1580731
Make the Cdn wet dream come true. Vote MAD MAX

Like a plague, JT must go!
User avatar
Catsumi
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 4235
Likes: 4809 posts
Liked in: 3717 posts
Joined: May 24th, 2017, 8:26 pm

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby Ka-El » Jan 8th, 2019, 8:19 am

hobbyguy wrote: I may not agree with all that Max has to say or do, but he far more worth listening to than the grim and boring Dimples Scheer - who stands for nothing.

Dimples - he's just a silly little boy who is nowhere near ready. Go Bernier! :up:
"I don't know who dimples is. I don't know what this means"
User avatar
Ka-El
Guru
 
Posts: 6562
Likes: 3565 posts
Liked in: 5870 posts
Joined: Oct 18th, 2015, 9:19 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby The Green Barbarian » Jan 8th, 2019, 8:47 am

Ka-El wrote:Dimples - he's just a silly little boy who is nowhere near ready. Go Bernier! :up:


Not sure who "dimples" is, but if this is a comment about the Conservatives, keep it up! This is perfect! :up:
If you see someone using the term "dimples", you are dealing with a bonehead.

Pete Podoski likes this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 30942
Likes: 14140 posts
Liked in: 19527 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: People's Party of Canada

Postby The Green Barbarian » Jan 8th, 2019, 8:48 am

hobbyguy wrote:The obvious low brow "Harper nasty" attacks on the PPC are an insult to Canadian's intellect. .


no, the Trudeau government, replete with brainless boobs like Gerald Butts and Climate Einstein McKenna are an insult to Canadian's intellect. This government must go.
If you see someone using the term "dimples", you are dealing with a bonehead.

2 people like this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 30942
Likes: 14140 posts
Liked in: 19527 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

PreviousNext

Return to Canada

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: butcher99, CommonCrawl [Bot], dle, ferri, Vacancyrate and 9 guests