Trudeau: His Unpopularity, His Failures

[VaxisSafe]

*removed*

[George Orwell 1984]

*removed*

[Patron]

*removed*

[SAILINGONE]

I like to address this issue by defending him, but he is the one who destroyed Canada in eight short years right in front of all of his dumb, deaf & blind cult follower and profiteers of the now trillions we Canadian tax paying wealth producers, current and future, owe, a country divided, a complete loss of foreign respect, doubling cost of all the basic daily needs for survival, all public services in total decline, while taxes have skyrocketed but we have enough cash to free government supplied hard drugs administered at government injection stations, with record casualties, gender choice surgery, while the real medical needed surgeries are cancelled, some record A.
A product of a confused laurentian wanna be socialist dictator and a boomer hippy, this spoon fed spoiled arrogant creature never had a change in the real world and instead of human behavior therapy & constant mental health care, after some school drama instructor failures and activist parts, the lpc with the help of the cbc, put him in the pm seat.
The culprits here are the ones who put him and keep him there, three times in a row.

[lesliepaul]

The TRUE haters are the ones screaming HATE as soon as someone questions them or tells them to stay away from their children.........then they loose their BIGTIME...........and there is always someone in that group screaming hate that is on the verge of violence.

..........."what's that..........I can't say that because you say it's hate"..............."I can't hear you over all of that screaming".

[normaM]

JT driving a vehicle with no reverse gear. So far the other Countries haven't condemned India ( everyone wooing them now)
No idea why Nijjar was allowed to stay in Canada when he entered using a fake passport
This is a fine mess indeed

[Gone_Fishin]

But, but, but Justin's doing such a great job...isn't he?

[featfan]

https://youtu.be/D1xNFfOFttg?si=qILzKUXmnP4F1XXt

The latest from the Celtic Canuck on having zelensky on our soil.

[rustled]

https://youtu.be/D1xNFfOFttg?si=qILzKUXmnP4F1XXt

The latest from the Celtic Canuck on having zelensky on our soil.

She does have a very concise and insightful way of hitting the nails on their heads.

[Iamme]

Look at all the carbon spewing vehicles, security and an ambulance to boot. Hypocritical narcissistic pr**K Volume up.

https://x.com/trudeaus_ego/status/17056 ... 40503?s=61

[The Green Barbarian]

GOLDSTEIN: It’s Trudeau’s world and the Liberals are trapped in it

The problem for the Liberals these days is that they’re trapped in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s world and it’s imploding around them.

An illustration of this is an interview Immigration Minister Marc Miller did last week with The Hill Times in which he called Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre a “charlatan”, “snake-oil salesman”, “classless jackass” and “serial bullsh–.”

Poilievre can give as good as he gets when it comes to insulting Trudeau, so that’s not the issue.

The issue is that Miller said nothing of substance about immigration in a lengthy interview over lunch, other than his view there’s a history of systemic racism in the only two government departments he’s held in cabinet, Crown-Indigenous relations and immigration.

Nothing about the concerns of a majority of Canadians (53% according to a recent Nanos poll, compared to 34% in March 2023) who think Trudeau’s policy to boost Canada’s immigration levels to 465,000 this year, 485,000 in 2024 and 500,000 in 2025 is too high.

That’s compared to 272,000 immigrants who became permanent residents of Canada in 2015, the year the Liberals came to power.

It’s not just ordinary Canadians expressing this concern.

Three major Canadian banks, for example, have the same view.

The TD Bank said, “continuing with a high-growth immigration strategy could widen the housing shortfall by about a half-million units within just two years.”

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics ... =9#image=1

[Iamme]

Yep. I agree. Trudeau is unhinged. 9 Billion freakin’ dollars! I’d rather that money be spent in Canada

https://x.com/amazingzoltan/status/1705 ... 07390?s=61

[Gone_Fishin]

Yep. I agree. Trudeau is unhinged. 9 Billion freakin’ dollars! I’d rather that money be spent in Canada

https://x.com/amazingzoltan/status/1705 ... 07390?s=61

Soapy sure left a scar on his forehead. Or did he get slugged by her boyfriend, Idris?

And in the comments - the resemblance is uncanny!

[The Green Barbarian]

Vivek Dehejia: Trudeau went all in on Indian interference and now he needs a royal flush

What a surreal week it’s been. Starting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau rising in the House of Commons, on Sept. 18, the first day back from summer recess, publicly and dramatically accusing “agents” of the Indian government of being complicit in the targeted, gangland-style killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen, in Surrey, B.C., back in June, the rest of the week saw a *bleep*-for-tat escalation in the diplomatic row. By week’s end, Canada-India bilateral relations stood at their worst ever since India became a sovereign nation in 1947.

The fallout thus far includes diplomatic expulsions on both sides, a ratcheted up Canadian travel advisory, and one from India that urges its citizens living, visiting, or studying in Canada to be cautious, suggesting they are in serious danger in a country whose government “condones” anti-India activity. On Sept. 19, India suspended issuing any new visas to Canadian citizens for an indefinite period. Canada is yet to retaliate, and by the time you are reading this, the other shoe may already have dropped.

Meanwhile, we can safely assume that the on-again-off-again trade negotiations — already with significantly watered down aspirations from the original more ambitious trade pact envisaged — is now officially DOA. While the current free fall may be arrested if both sides move to de-escalate, there is no serious possibility of any improvement in bilateral relations while both Trudeau and his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi, are in power.

Trudeau is currently suffering his own free fall in the polls, and Modi’s strong numbers, if anything, have jumped, off the back of India’s aggressive response to Canada, burnishing his image of being a strong and decisive leader who won’t let India be pushed around on the world stage.

Did it have to be this way? Absolutely not. What has caused the current tailspin is the manner in which Trudeau levelled his allegations, not the substance of the allegations themselves. Let’s be clear: the allegations are very serious, and, if they are proved true, India has a lot of explaining to do. The problem is that neither Trudeau nor anyone else has provided much evidence to back them up. Given that India has categorically denied being involved in the killing, the public is left in the uncomfortable position of being forced to take one democratic leader’s word over another, or simply to suspend judgement.

And there’s the rub. In previous situations where one country very publicly levels allegations against another, at least some of the evidence that is claimed to support those allegations is suitably redacted and then made public. Remember Colin Powell’s famous show and tell on television, when he tried to convince the American and global public that the U.S. had incontrovertible proof of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? It turned out that the U.S. was wrong, of course, but the point is that they made an effort to sway public opinion.

All that Canadians have to go on is reporting in the CBC and Associated Press, presumably emanating from leaks, which suggests that Canada has “intelligence” backing up its claims that consists of surveillance of diplomats, and signal intelligence, possibly, from a Canadian ally. But none of that is in the public domain and is unlikely to satisfy anyone. Nor are Canada’s allies fully convinced. The U.S., the U.K., and Australia, amongst others, have all expressed “serious concern” or used similar verbiage. In diplomatic speak, this is just punting the ball. What’s relevant is that none of them, including the U.S., have condemned India. If the evidence that Canada had shown to allies amounted to a proverbial smoking gun, they would likely have been less equivocal. What’s more, Trudeau’s very public spat with India has put Canada’s allies in the awkward situation of having to walk a tightrope balancing act between an old ally and an important new one.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/v ... =5#image=1

[Gone_Fishin]

Liberal MPs have serious issues with Justin's divisive approach to Canada.

“Both the tone and the policies of my government changed drastically on the eve and during the last election campaign. From a positive and unifying approach, a decision was made to wedge, to divide and to stigmatize.” - Liberal MP Joel Lightbound

Q: Which part of the decision "to wedge, to divide and to stigmatize” will help Canada reach our potential? Which part of the name calling will unite the country to be a better place for our children and the world? It's a testament to small thinkers - captured by petty politics.

Some people are so enamoured with themselves that they think only people who think like them are welcome or of value.

They've turned the old saying "united we stand and divided we fall" on its head with no evidence that it leads to progress. Great thinkers from Martin Luther King to Mahatma Gandhi would be rolling in their graves.