Americans bomb Syria

[peaceseeker]

It's OK when the West kills civilians en masse cuz they use the good bombs!

I believe U3O8 stated it best in the comments from the linked article...

"Committing more War crimes & murder by playing uninvited World's Policemen when the whole planet knows Assad didn't do it & ISIS is backed by Israel - US - Saudi's - Jordan - Qatar etc.

What a bunch of dystopic pathocratic psychopathic thugs."

U.S. Airstrikes Kill 21, Mostly Civilians, in Northern Syria
http://www.blacklistednews.com/U.S._Air ... 8/Y/M.html
Published: April 10, 2017
Source: ANTI WAR

While US “outrage” at civilian casualties from Syrian airstrikes is being used as a pretext for military intervention against the Syrian government, US forces continue their own airstrikes backing military operations in northeastern Syria, and are killing an increasing number of civilians in their own right.

Yesterday, US airstrikes near Raqqa killed at least 21 people, mostly civilians, and while some of the strikes were near fighting between US-backed troops and ISIS, at least one of the strikes appears to have been a deliberate attack on a boatload of civilians attempting to cross the Euphrates River.

The boat was carrying about 40 people, and NGOs say that at least seven bodies, six of them children, have been recovered so far, with more missing. The US has dropped leaflets in the area urging civilians to flee toward the Euphrates, but apparently dropped a second leaflet warning them not to try to cross the river or they’d be attacked.

The airstrikes centered around the village of Hanida, which is along the Euphrates River west of Raqqa. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported a number of additional civilians killed in US strikes on the village. That the US is attacking the village is puzzling, because ISIS is not believed to have any presence in the village itself, and it appears to be at least some distance from the fight.

The biggest target in the Hanida strikes was an Internet cafe, with the US strike destroying the site, killing 14 people within, including four children. The US is so far not offering any justification for any of the attacks in the area.


It's been in the works for some time...

1983 CIA Document Reveals Plan To Destroy Syria, Foreshadows Current Crisis
http://www.blacklistednews.com/1983_CIA ... 8/Y/M.html
Published: April 11, 2017
Source: Zero Hedge

Prophetically foreshadowing the current crisis (and apparent action plan), leaked CIA documents from the reign of Bashar al-Assad's father in the 1980s show a Washington Deep State plan coalescing to "bring real muscle to bear against Syria," toppling its leader (in favor of one amenable to US demands) , severing ties with Russia (its primary arms dealer), and paving the way for an oil and gas pipeline of Washington's choosing.

continued...
http://www.blacklistednews.com/1983_CIA ... 8/Y/M.html

[maryjane48]

no it wrong when the west kills innocents which they do . since the korean war the americans have commited war crimes . but they havnt used sarin gas . i do consider using depleted uranium shells to be as bad as gas the diff being the uranium kills over a longtime were gas is immediate .

i wish putin would off assad but i cant see it happening

[peaceseeker]

no it wrong when the west kills innocents which they do . since the korean war the americans have commited war crimes . but they havnt used sarin gas . i do consider using depleted uranium shells to be as bad as gas the diff being the uranium kills over a longtime were gas is immediate .

i wish putin would off assad but i cant see it happening

Still no evidence whatsoever of Assad committing the attacks other than the talking heads in msm/govt. telling you so.

US war crimes, the list is long...

United States War Crimes: From Korea to Afghanistan
http://www.globalresearch.ca/united-sta ... es/5561468
By Brian S. Willson and Lenora Foerstel
Global Research, January 29, 2017
Global Research 26 January 2002

[Barney Google]

Oooo la la...grab your panties and hang on Russia is now accusing the US of committing an illegal attack on Syria.

[Thinktank]

" I think I'll get along with Putin. I don't know, but I probably will get along with him"
said the Atlantic City Casino owner.



and we believed him.

[Barney Google]

" I think I'll get along with Putin. I don't know, but I probably will get along with him"
said the Atlantic City Casino owner.



and we believed him.

Some of the sheep believes him...others? Meh, no so muchie...baaaaaa

[peaceseeker]

Why Russia has become the number-one target in the US press
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017 ... -us-press/
By Jon Rappoport

The new devil in the US press, as of last summer, was Russia. All of a sudden. And then, in the wake of the election, the devil became the DEVIL. Was this nothing more than an attempt to discredit Trump and his victory?

No. It was definitely something more.

As David Icke stated on the Richie Allen show a few days ago, Russia was the player who was standing in the way of the long-term goal to get rid of Assad in Syria and turn the country into a hellhole like Libya.

The US government and its allies had created, funded, and armed the group called ISIS, the proxy force for, among other operations, wiping out the Assad government in Syria. The Syria op was a slam-dunk…until it wasn’t. Until Putin stepped in and gave air support to Assad’s troops and turned the war around, bringing it to the brink of, God forbid, actual peace negotiations.

That outcome was definitely NOT on the agenda of the US Project for a New American Century, the neocon playbook for destabilizing the Middle East.

Putin was standing in the way. He was screwing up The Plan. He was winning.

Therefore, another WMD (as in Iraq) situation was required. This time, based on no reasonable evidence, the reported weapon would be sarin gas, and the place would be Syria, and the perpetrator would be Assad. And before the sarin-Assad claims could be studied fully, it was time for a response, an attack, a missile strike. The objective? Destroy the peace process in Syria, paint Assad as the killer.

Trump went along. He pulled the trigger. He was fed “evidence” that Assad was killing his own people with outlawed chemical weapons, and he ordered the missile strike.

And now, every neocon in Washington who can get press coverage is saying the Trump has, for the first time, “become the president.”

And that’s true, if by “president” we mean a person who is ingesting “evidence” and taking marching orders from above; from what has been called the Deep State.

A State dedicated to endless war.

Jon Rappoport

[Thinktank]

Russia was the player who was standing in the way of the long-term goal to get rid of Assad in Syria and turn the country into a hellhole like Libya.

Maybe Israel is the one who wants Syria to be a hell hole, so they'll never ask
for their Golan Heights back ever again.

[peaceseeker]

Top ten reasons to doubt official story on Assad poison-gas attack
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017 ... as-attack/
By Jon Rappoport
April 13, 2017

The sarin-gas attack story prompted the US missile strike on a Syrian runway. Here are the top ten reasons for doubting that story, and instead calling it a convenient pretext:

ONE: Photos show rescue workers treating/decontaminating people injured or killed in the gas attack. The workers aren’t wearing gloves or protective gear. Only the clueless or crazy would expose themselves to sarin residue, which can be fatal.

TWO: MIT professor Thomas Postol told RT, “I believe it can be shown, without doubt, that the [US intelligence] document does not provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete knowledge that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical attack in Khan Shaykhun…Any competent analyst would have had questions about whether the debris in the crater was staged or real. No competent analyst would miss the fact that the alleged sarin canister was forcefully crushed from above, rather than exploded by a munition within it.” How would a canister purportedly dropped from an Assad-ordered plane incur “crushing from above?”

THREE: Why would President Assad, supported by Russia, scoring victory after victory against ISIS, moving closer to peace negotiations, suddenly risk all his gains by dropping sarin gas on his own people?

FOUR: In an interview with Scott Horton, ex-CIA officer Philip Giraldi states that his intelligence and military sources indicate Assad didn’t attack his own people with poison gas.

FIVE: Ex-CIA officer Ray McGovern states that his military sources report an Assad air strike did hit a chemical plant, and the fallout killed people, but the attack was not planned for that purpose. There was no knowledge the chemicals were lethal.

SIX: At consortiumnews.com, journalist Robert Parry writes, “There is a dark mystery behind the White House-released photo showing President Trump and more than a dozen advisers meeting at his estate in Mar-a-Lago after his decision to strike Syria with Tomahawk missiles: Where are CIA Director Mike Pompeo and other top intelligence officials?”

“Before the photo was released on Friday, a source told me that Pompeo had personally briefed Trump on April 6 about the CIA’s belief that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was likely not responsible for the lethal poison-gas incident in northern Syria two days earlier — and thus Pompeo was excluded from the larger meeting as Trump reached a contrary decision.”

“After the attack, Secretary of State Tillerson, who is not an institutional intelligence official and has little experience with the subtleties of intelligence, was the one to claim that the U.S. intelligence community assessed with a ‘high degree of confidence’ that the Syrian government had dropped a poison gas bomb on civilians in Idlib province.”

“While Tillerson’s comment meshed with Official Washington’s hastily formed groupthink of Assad’s guilt, it is hard to believe that CIA analysts would have settled on such a firm conclusion so quickly, especially given the remote location of the incident and the fact that the initial information was coming from pro-rebel (or Al Qaeda) sources.”

“Thus, a serious question arises whether President Trump did receive that ‘high degree of confidence’ assessment from the intelligence community or whether he shunted Pompeo aside to eliminate an obstacle to his desire to launch the April 6 rocket attack.”

SEVEN: As soon as the Assad gas attack was reported, the stage was set for a US missile strike. No comprehensive investigation of the purported gas attack was undertaken.

EIGHT: There are, of course, precedents for US wars based on false evidence—the missing WMDs in Iraq, the claims of babies being pushed out of incubators in Kuwait, to name just two.

NINE: Who benefits from the sarin gas story? Assad? Or US neocons; the US military-industrial complex; Pentagon generals who want a huge increase in their military budget; Trump and his team, who are suddenly praised in the press, after a year of being pilloried at every turn; and ISIS?

TEN: For those who doubt that ISIS has ever used poison gas, see the NY Times (11/21/2016). While claiming that Assad has deployed chemical attacks, the article also states that ISIS has deployed chemical weapons 52 times since 2014.

I’m not claiming these ten reasons definitely and absolutely rule out the possibility of an Assad-ordered chemical attack. But they do add up to a far more believable conclusion than the quickly assembled “Assad-did-it” story.

These ten reasons starkly point to the lack of a rational and complete investigation of the “gas attack.”

And this lack throws a monkey wrench into Trump’s claim that he was ordering the missile strike based on “a high degree of confidence.”

[Thinktank]

Top ten reasons to doubt official story on Assad poison-gas attack

I think it's funny how guys like Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau, will stand up before
30 million Canadians and lie straight to our face, and the bomb the hell out of people
in another country, because our billionaires want more money.

Gadafy never did the things they said he did either. But that didn't stop Harper from bombing him.

[Atomoa]

So "moderate rebels" killed 68 children Syrian yesterday by driving a car bomb into a convoy of busses packed with civilians and aid workers. 126 total dead.

Of course, the media called them "pro regime evacuees" instead of civilians and also interesting that the media didn't demand cruise missiles or question why the US supports these "rebels".

The rebels that Justin Trudeau supports threw food into the street to lure starving children into the bomb kill-zone.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/15/middleeas ... s-bombing/

[peaceseeker]

Wakey, wakey...

Confirmed: Syrian chemical attack a scam - We said it, now MIT prof confirms it
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/news ... -scam.html

warning: some coarse language


Staged with media BS support

We called it.

Now an MIT professor with extensive forensic experience confirms it.

The story of the chemical attack in Syria is a total scam.

Hard evidence shows that the canisters were not even dropped from a plane as claimed.

Innocent people were killed, but they were killed in a staged scene, not from an attack by a Syrian government plane.

[Drip_Torch]

As far as these type of videos go, that wasn't the worst one I've seen. I made it to one minute and 37 seconds before I went click, close... doesn't have a clue.

Ghouta chemical attack was ISIS (shaking my head).

Do you have access to a map of Syria?

[peaceseeker]

As far as these type of videos go, that wasn't the worst one I've seen. I made it to one minute and 37 seconds before I went click, close... doesn't have a clue.

Ghouta chemical attack was ISIS (shaking my head).

Do you have access to a map of Syria?

You're quick to forget the same play was made way back in 2013. You fell for it then and falling for it again. Quit listening to the purveyors of fake news. Turn off the idiot box and do some research for yourself.

[Drip_Torch]

You're quick to forget the same play was made way back in 2013

Yeah, okay. According to your video the Ghouta chemical attack was Daesh.

Again I'll ask, do you have access to a map of Syria? Your video plays well to the idiot box crowd looking for a binary solution set. Bad guys wear black, good guys wear green and we'll draw the line on the map here and line up our plastic play figures.

Quit listening to the purveyors of fake news

Great advice! I think I'll take it.