Joe Biden Discussion

[The Green Barbarian]

Look at what President Biden is still dealing with.....

More than 2,100 children separated at border 'have not yet been reunified,' Biden task force says

Imagine if that idiot Biden hadn't stopped Trump's policies of all illegals staying in Mexico. What a giant fool that guy is.

[The Green Barbarian]

First Elon tweets in support of Canadian truckers, and then he calls Biden a "damp sock puppet". The darling of the Left is going to get shunned and canceled pretty soon by the idiots who used to embrace him, as JK Rowling found out. Keep up the great work Elon!

Elon Musk calls Biden a ‘damp sock puppet’ after White House CEO snub

The gloves are off between Elon Musk and the White House.

The billionaire Tesla founder escalated his feud with the Biden administration Thursday after the electric carmaker was again omitted from a summit meeting with top business leaders, including the CEOs of General Motors and Ford, to promote President Biden’s “Build Back Better” bill.

Musk took particular umbrage at a post on Biden’s Twitter account, which included a video of the president standing with GM CEO Mary Bara and declared that “companies like GM and Ford are building more electric vehicles here at home than ever before.”

“Biden is treating the American public like fools,” Musk seethed.

In another tweet, Musk quipped that Biden was “a damp [sock] puppet in human form.”

The White House has yet to address Musk’s comments.

Biden has prioritized investments in electric vehicles and other green energy technologies as part of his spending bill. The “Build Back Better Act” passed in the House but has stalled in the Senate due to opposition from key moderate Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona

https://nypost.com/2022/01/28/elon-musk ... fter-snub/

[The Green Barbarian]

Biden's Nearly 2M Mail-In Pennsylvania Votes in 2020 Would Now Be 'Unconstitutional'

In Pennsylvania, in the 2020 presidential election, President Joe Biden received nearly 2 million mail-in votes, which according to a new court ruling, would be "unconstitutional" for future elections.

On Friday morning, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the state's 2019 law that expanded mail-in voting. The ruling comes after former President Donald Trump and his allies have questioned the legitimacy of the 2020 election, filing numerous court cases following the 2020 election.

In Pennsylvania, in the 2020 presidential election, President Joe Biden received nearly 2 million mail-in votes, which according to a new court ruling, would be "unconstitutional" for future elections.

According to the Pennsylvania Election Returns' website, Biden received 1,995,691 mail-in votes to Trump's 595,538. Biden won the state and its 20 electoral votes with 50.1 percent of the vote to Trump's 48.84 percent.

Following Friday's news, Trump praised the ruling, writing, "Big news out of Pennsylvania, great patriotic spirit is developing at a level that nobody thought possible. Make America Great Again."

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/bi ... d=msedgntp

This just goes to show, without ballot harvesting Joe would have gotten creamed in 2020, if Pennsylvania is any indication. I wonder how in one election ballot harvesting is ok, and then suddenly it's not, because it's not "constitutional". Where were these guys in 2020 to stop the Joe and Kamala flatulating clown show?

[foenix]

Biden's Nearly 2M Mail-In Pennsylvania Votes in 2020 Would Now Be 'Unconstitutional'

In Pennsylvania, in the 2020 presidential election, President Joe Biden received nearly 2 million mail-in votes, which according to a new court ruling, would be "unconstitutional" for future elections.

On Friday morning, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the state's 2019 law that expanded mail-in voting. The ruling comes after former President Donald Trump and his allies have questioned the legitimacy of the 2020 election, filing numerous court cases following the 2020 election.

In Pennsylvania, in the 2020 presidential election, President Joe Biden received nearly 2 million mail-in votes, which according to a new court ruling, would be "unconstitutional" for future elections.

According to the Pennsylvania Election Returns' website, Biden received 1,995,691 mail-in votes to Trump's 595,538. Biden won the state and its 20 electoral votes with 50.1 percent of the vote to Trump's 48.84 percent.

Following Friday's news, Trump praised the ruling, writing, "Big news out of Pennsylvania, great patriotic spirit is developing at a level that nobody thought possible. Make America Great Again."

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/bi ... d=msedgntp

This just goes to show, without ballot harvesting Joe would have gotten creamed in 2020, if Pennsylvania is any indication. I wonder how in one election ballot harvesting is ok, and then suddenly it's not, because it's not "constitutional". Where were these guys in 2020 to stop the Joe and Kamala flatulating clown show?

That's what happens when a state has gerrymander the state lines to favour the Republicans and then controls, the legislative body and the state supreme court. Then they are free to enable their GOP only get voted in agenda.

[The Green Barbarian]

That's what happens when a state has gerrymander the state lines to favour the Republicans and then controls, the legislative body and the state supreme court.

That's a pretty insane and downright stupid accusation, that you would definitely require some sort of support before making. No one controls any supreme courts, that is, unless the Dems have their way with court packing. There definitely is something else going on here. I am assuming that there was just too much potential for fraud (oh no the BIG LIE lol lol lol) with mail in voting. You know that when people vote without even knowing that they voted that that isn't really "democracy", it's just a way to get your guy into power, no matter what.

I would not say that the will of the people of Pennsylvania was served in the 2020 election, even if the results weren't technically "legal" at that time, and now they would be considered "illegal".

Then they are free to enable their GOP only get voted in agenda.

No, they are free to enable an agenda where people have to actually vote, and their ballot can't just be harvested without their knowledge or their permission. The Democrats want a "Dems only get voted in agenda" of course, and now we see bald faced lies being used to try and defend this garbage.

Clearly Biden would have had his senile old flatulent butt handed to him in 2020 were it not for mass ballot harvesting. And now the courts are waking up to this. This is just adding up more and more to a "one and done" presidency for the Dems, after they lose both houses of course. And they only have themselves to blame, not any Supreme court or "gerrymandering". It's their own stupidity that's doing them in, and every day they just get dumber.

[foenix]

That's what happens when a state has gerrymander the state lines to favour the Republicans and then controls, the legislative body and the state supreme court.

That's a pretty insane and downright stupid accusation, that you would definitely require some sort of support before making. No one controls any supreme courts, that is, unless the Dems have their way with court packing. There definitely is something else going on here. I am assuming that there was just too much potential for fraud (oh no the BIG LIE lol lol lol) with mail in voting. You know that when people vote without even knowing that they voted that that isn't really "democracy", it's just a way to get your guy into power, no matter what.

I would not say that the will of the people of Pennsylvania was served in the 2020 election, even if the results weren't technically "legal" at that time, and now they would be considered "illegal".

Then they are free to enable their GOP only get voted in agenda.

No, they are free to enable an agenda where people have to actually vote, and their ballot can't just be harvested without their knowledge or their permission. The Democrats want a "Dems only get voted in agenda" of course, and now we see bald faced lies being used to try and defend this garbage.

Clearly Biden would have had his senile old flatulent butt handed to him in 2020 were it not for mass ballot harvesting. And now the courts are waking up to this. This is just adding up more and more to a "one and done" presidency for the Dems, after they lose both houses of course. And they only have themselves to blame, not any Supreme court or "gerrymandering". It's their own stupidity that's doing them in, and every day they just get dumber.

...... don't know how the US state level politics works hey? It shows in the post. Try researching a bit and come back with a reasonable argument that doesn't show the gaps and holes in the knowledge.

[JLives]

Biden's Nearly 2M Mail-In Pennsylvania Votes in 2020 Would Now Be 'Unconstitutional'

In Pennsylvania, in the 2020 presidential election, President Joe Biden received nearly 2 million mail-in votes, which according to a new court ruling, would be "unconstitutional" for future elections.

On Friday morning, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the state's 2019 law that expanded mail-in voting. The ruling comes after former President Donald Trump and his allies have questioned the legitimacy of the 2020 election, filing numerous court cases following the 2020 election.

In Pennsylvania, in the 2020 presidential election, President Joe Biden received nearly 2 million mail-in votes, which according to a new court ruling, would be "unconstitutional" for future elections.

According to the Pennsylvania Election Returns' website, Biden received 1,995,691 mail-in votes to Trump's 595,538. Biden won the state and its 20 electoral votes with 50.1 percent of the vote to Trump's 48.84 percent.

Following Friday's news, Trump praised the ruling, writing, "Big news out of Pennsylvania, great patriotic spirit is developing at a level that nobody thought possible. Make America Great Again."

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/bi ... d=msedgntp

This just goes to show, without ballot harvesting Joe would have gotten creamed in 2020, if Pennsylvania is any indication. I wonder how in one election ballot harvesting is ok, and then suddenly it's not, because it's not "constitutional". Where were these guys in 2020 to stop the Joe and Kamala flatulating clown show?

I don't think you understand what ballot harvesting is. It's when a third party individual physically collects ballots and drops them off at a polling station. It does not include mail in voting. How you are using the term is a synonym for counting legal votes. And this is what I've been saying for years. When voters can vote unrestricted, and their votes are legally counted, Democrats win because it's who the majority of people actually want to vote for. The only way Republicans' win these days is by making it harder to vote, reducing access and gerrymandering. It would be nice if they put as much effort into drafting policies as they do into skewing election results, or in some cases committing flat out fraud. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/21/us/p ... ctors.html

And if you don't beleive gerrymandering is real. This is Dan Crenshaw's district in Texas.

[foenix]

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/other/bi ... d=msedgntp

This just goes to show, without ballot harvesting Joe would have gotten creamed in 2020, if Pennsylvania is any indication. I wonder how in one election ballot harvesting is ok, and then suddenly it's not, because it's not "constitutional". Where were these guys in 2020 to stop the Joe and Kamala flatulating clown show?

I don't think you understand what ballot harvesting is. It's when a third party individual physically collects ballots and drops them off at a polling station. It does not include mail in voting. How you are using the term is a synonym for counting legal votes. And this is what I've been saying for years. When voters can vote unrestricted, and their votes are legally counted, Democrats win because it's who the majority of people actually want to vote for. The only way Republicans' win these days is by making it harder to vote, reducing access and gerrymandering. It would be nice if they put as much effort into drafting policies as they do into skewing election results, or in some cases committing flat out fraud. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/21/us/p ... ctors.html

And if you don't beleive gerrymandering is real. This is Dan Crenshaw's district in Texas.

Oh.....that's some gerrymandering.....I suppose Dan's district is mostly white? ......as it pretzels and twists around the black neighborhoods.......what a joke!!

[rustled]

That's what happens when a state has gerrymander the state lines to favour the Republicans and then controls, the legislative body and the state supreme court.

That's a pretty insane and downright stupid accusation, that you would definitely require some sort of support before making. No one controls any supreme courts, that is, unless the Dems have their way with court packing. There definitely is something else going on here. I am assuming that there was just too much potential for fraud (oh no the BIG LIE lol lol lol) with mail in voting. You know that when people vote without even knowing that they voted that that isn't really "democracy", it's just a way to get your guy into power, no matter what.

I would not say that the will of the people of Pennsylvania was served in the 2020 election, even if the results weren't technically "legal" at that time, and now they would be considered "illegal".

Then they are free to enable their GOP only get voted in agenda.

No, they are free to enable an agenda where people have to actually vote, and their ballot can't just be harvested without their knowledge or their permission. The Democrats want a "Dems only get voted in agenda" of course, and now we see bald faced lies being used to try and defend this garbage.

Clearly Biden would have had his senile old flatulent butt handed to him in 2020 were it not for mass ballot harvesting. And now the courts are waking up to this. This is just adding up more and more to a "one and done" presidency for the Dems, after they lose both houses of course. And they only have themselves to blame, not any Supreme court or "gerrymandering". It's their own stupidity that's doing them in, and every day they just get dumber.

It seems unlikely to me Biden would have won without the pandemic. That gave the Democrats an excuse for closeting him away during the campaign, and provided opportunities related to mail-in voting and ballot harvesting - along with the false narratives we saw from Democrat-supporting media and social media about "removing postal drop boxes" and "Black people have a hard time getting ID" that were intended to make it seem there were impediments to voting Democrat, which "required" amending through the relaxation of some of the ordinary and sensible rules normally in place for democratic elections.

It's difficult to imagine a better cloak for running a presidential candidate who was increasingly experiencing significant age-related difficulty, as we can see when comparing video of Biden during the leadership race to video late in the presidential campaign, and recent video.

[Pappywinkle]

It seems unlikely to me Biden would have won without the pandemic. That gave the Democrats an excuse for closeting him away during the campaign, and provided opportunities related to mail-in voting and ballot harvesting - along with the false narratives we saw from Democrat-supporting media and social media about "removing postal drop boxes" and "Black people have a hard time getting ID" that were intended to make it seem there were impediments to voting Democrat, which "required" amending through the relaxation of some of the ordinary and sensible rules normally in place for democratic elections.

It's pretty depressing that over a year later after all the recounts and all the audits that there are adults dumb enough to still parrot the 'ballot harvesting' nonsense, which was proven to have been solely committed by Republicans. Strange how the right screamed from the rooftops about voter fraud and audits to being completely silent when the audits only found fraud from Republicans.

President Joe Biden is doing an amazing job and is a fantastic leader! Keep up the great work, Joe!

[The Green Barbarian]

I don't think you understand what ballot harvesting is. It's when a third party individual physically collects ballots and drops them off at a polling station.

Now you're just getting into semantics. Ballot-harvesting/mail in voting - whatever - there's a reason why the courts, who are trying to protect democracy, are realizing what the Democrats did in 2020 wasn't exactly passing the smell test when it comes to holding free and fair elections. I just wish the courts had been there to stop this nonsense in 2019 before it all started, as the US wouldn't have to be enduring such a terrible clown show of a government right now.

[The Green Barbarian]

It seems unlikely to me Biden would have won without the pandemic. That gave the Democrats an excuse for closeting him away during the campaign, and provided opportunities related to mail-in voting and ballot harvesting - along with the false narratives we saw from Democrat-supporting media and social media about "removing postal drop boxes" and "Black people have a hard time getting ID" that were intended to make it seem there were impediments to voting Democrat, which "required" amending through the relaxation of some of the ordinary and sensible rules normally in place for democratic elections.

It's difficult to imagine a better cloak for running a presidential candidate who was increasingly experiencing significant age-related difficulty, as we can see when comparing video of Biden during the leadership race to video late in the presidential campaign, and recent video.

You nailed it Rustled. If old senile Joe had had to campaign, along with the cackling idiot Kamala, they would have been dead to rights. They took advantage of a loophole and were able to pull it off, but like Jimmy Carter, all that may have happened is that they have now set the Democratic party back for a decade or more.

[Pappywinkle]

I don't think you understand what ballot harvesting is. It's when a third party individual physically collects ballots and drops them off at a polling station.

[Pappywinkle]

It's so great seeing President Biden fight so hard against climate change, and rightly so!

Keep up the great work, Joe!

Analysis: Biden gets climate win with court 'loss' on Gulf of Mexico oil leases

A U.S. judge’s surprise decision this week to annul the Biden administration’s first Gulf of Mexico oil lease auction because of its climate change impact has raised questions about the future of the nation’s federal drilling program – and played directly into the president’s hand.

President Joe Biden, a Democrat, made a campaign pledge to end federal oil and gas drilling to fight climate change. That was a stark contrast to then-President Donald Trump, a pro-drilling climate skeptic. Some 25% of U.S. oil and gas production comes from federal lands and waters.

But the U.S. District Court of Louisiana in June blocked his administration’s attempt to suspend new leasing auctions pending a broad program review, after several drilling states sued. The court upheld the states' argument that the federal government has a Congressional mandate to regularly auction off public acreage to enhance energy independence and generate revenue.

That decision by a Trump-appointed judge in Louisiana forced Biden’s Interior Department to proceed with the previously planned auction off the Gulf Coast in November. That sale generated more than $190 million, the highest since 2019, on 1.7 million acres sold, and drew bids from majors including Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N) and Chevron Corp (CVX.N).

This week’s ruling, from a judge in the District of Columbia appointed by former President Barack Obama, came after a challenge by environmental group Earthjustice. In a "defeat" for Biden, it vacated the Gulf of Mexico auction entirely. The judge said the Interior Department failed to properly account for its impact on global warming.

https://www.reuters.com/business/sustai ... 022-01-28/

[The Green Barbarian]