Joe Biden Discussion
-
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 104504
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
It ended when there was nothing to impeach, after America saw in June, finally, that they had elected a dementia-addled brain dead fool in 2020.
Last edited by The Green Barbarian on Dec 30th, 2024, 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
We told yall Project 2025 wasn't real.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 6365
- Joined: Feb 4th, 2021, 7:57 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
Anyone and everyone that pays attention knows these clowns take their time to craft narratives around issues … before Biden was (s)elected in 2020 there were reports coming out that he wouldn’t survive to the end of his term because he’s a demented old fool equivalent a walking cadaver … one of the reasons he puts on the show he does is that apparently someone who is mentally incompetent can’t be tried criminally …The Green Barbarian wrote: ↑Dec 29th, 2024, 5:20 pm
Details of the Biden crime family syndicate are still coming out...and still to be revealed. The biggest issue? All the brainless fools going on about Trump being a "criminal", while giving the Biden Crime Family a giant pass. Total hypocrisy, and just plain disgusting. So evil and so awful. Biden better pardon himself, as he's going to end up in a mess of legal trouble when the truth is revealed.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... oe-biden-/
https://moulton.house.gov/news/in-the-n ... s-dementia
And here we are …
-
- Guru
- Posts: 7893
- Joined: May 29th, 2013, 2:08 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
I thought the republicans had the house and could and did subpoena witnesses.
Hunters laptop may or may not have had incriminating evidence on it but after he lost the chain of possession, I really doubt any information on it could be used in a trial.
Regardless, if Joe was corrupt, I'd be thinking he would have been held to task during trump's first go around at president when they had the senate and the house.
Joe becomes president after trump and his two impeachments so *bleep* for tat... didn't work out quite the way they wanted though.
For the record, I'm not a fan of Biden's administration's spending and increasing the debt. They should have reigned it in after trump's raising it to already unsustainable levels.
Will trump's tax cuts exacerbate the debt or will corresponding cuts reduce the debt?
I am not wealthy but I am rich
-
- Admiral HMS Castanet
- Posts: 29642
- Joined: Dec 26th, 2010, 12:47 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
There's no logic in the belief the House had the power to get to the truth about Joe Biden. Regardless of which party "has" the House or the Senate, the US political establishment has always been protecting itself from scrutiny with Joe Biden as their most recent beard.seewood wrote: ↑Dec 30th, 2024, 8:50 amI thought the republicans had the house and could and did subpoena witnesses.
Hunters laptop may or may not have had incriminating evidence on it but after he lost the chain of possession, I really doubt any information on it could be used in a trial.
Regardless, if Joe was corrupt, I'd be thinking he would have been held to task during trump's first go around at president when they had the senate and the house.
Joe becomes president after trump and his two impeachments so *bleep* for tat... didn't work out quite the way they wanted though.
For the record, I'm not a fan of Biden's administration's spending and increasing the debt.
Most academics operate in a rarified world where their highfalutin pontification is decoupled from reality. However, ideas have real consequences. Products, political systems, and policies that are incongruent with human nature always fail... Gad Saad
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Jul 20th, 2024, 8:34 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
Huh, who knew? Well, we can say, not all of us were duped.
President Joe Biden’s “obvious cognitive decline” was the most underreported story of 2024, CBS News reporter Jan Crawford claimed on Sunday, conceding the octogenarian’s declining mental acuity appeared obvious to all but members of the corporate media whose very job it was to cover the White House and its occupant.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... 024-story/
President Joe Biden’s “obvious cognitive decline” was the most underreported story of 2024, CBS News reporter Jan Crawford claimed on Sunday, conceding the octogenarian’s declining mental acuity appeared obvious to all but members of the corporate media whose very job it was to cover the White House and its occupant.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... 024-story/
For The People, By The People
-
- Admiral HMS Castanet
- Posts: 29565
- Joined: Jul 22nd, 2012, 8:02 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
Apparently not a serious issue since his replacement is at least as affected, and no one on the right seems to care, now that Biden is heading out. Since Biden's every move, from how he sat down on a chair on the podium, to which soldiers he spoke to at an infomal public parchutist demonstration, I hope the close scrutiny of every move, and every phrase of U.S. Presidents will be under the microscope. AND, if mental decline is an issue, as it seems to be for some people, let's have the full medical exam results, and cognitive tests, for U.S. Presidents carried out by INDEPENDENT examiners. AND what should be the remedy? Some called for Biden's removal, and certainly many thought he should not run again for Pres. So why wasn't that applied to all Presidential candidates, and Presidents going forward?The Green Barbarian wrote: ↑Dec 20th, 2024, 3:56 pmJoe Biden has severe cognitive decline, and the White House knew it since 2020.Bigbacardi wrote: ↑Dec 20th, 2024, 2:30 pm
Nope, the thread is about joe biden, I don't see anywhere that it is specifically about his cognitive decline.
[youtube]
-
- Guru
- Posts: 7893
- Joined: May 29th, 2013, 2:08 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Dec 30th, 2024, 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Off Topic
Reason: Off Topic
I am not wealthy but I am rich
-
- Admiral HMS Castanet
- Posts: 29642
- Joined: Dec 26th, 2010, 12:47 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Dec 30th, 2024, 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Response to removed post.
Reason: Response to removed post.
Most academics operate in a rarified world where their highfalutin pontification is decoupled from reality. However, ideas have real consequences. Products, political systems, and policies that are incongruent with human nature always fail... Gad Saad
-
- Guru
- Posts: 6365
- Joined: Feb 4th, 2021, 7:57 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
*removed*
-
- Guru
- Posts: 7893
- Joined: May 29th, 2013, 2:08 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
Not sure how, try as the republicans did regarding impeaching Joe, they couldn't , nor even get Jim or Comer to vote for an impeachment regardless democrat Jared Moskowitz presented a motion to.
rustled wrote: ↑Dec 30th, 2024, 9:18 am While it was always in the US political establishment's interests to impeach Trump and air as much dirty laundry as could be dug up in as suggestive a way as possible to effect maximum belief in Trump's guilt because Trump is a threat to the US political establishment, it has never been in the US political establishment's interests to air ANY dirty laundry about their beards - particularly someone who had become as essential to their operation as Joe Biden.
Didn't require any digging up. Trump was on record for trying to shake down Zelenski, financial records for paying hush money to a porn star and corresponding fiddling the books, keeping top secret documents after being told to return them so they had to get them themselves.air as much dirty laundry as could be dug up
Trump did many things in full view of the media and government, no one had to dig up any serendipitous, nefarious doings, it was always in full view.
I am not wealthy but I am rich
-
- Admiral HMS Castanet
- Posts: 29642
- Joined: Dec 26th, 2010, 12:47 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
This can't possibly come as a surprise to anyone who's paying attention to how the US political system deals with threats to the US political establishment.
As did Joe Biden - no "digging up" required. That's who this thread is actually about. Biden's cognitive impairment was in full view - his inappropriateness for office didn't need to be dug up. Joe Biden talked about how he'd got things done - oops - and when he talked about it, he was talking about using his political power to do it. And he, too, had top secret documents, although he didn't even seem to know he had some of them - they weren't even in a secure location.seewood wrote:rustled wrote: ↑Dec 30th, 2024, 9:18 am While it was always in the US political establishment's interests to impeach Trump and air as much dirty laundry as could be dug up in as suggestive a way as possible to effect maximum belief in Trump's guilt because Trump is a threat to the US political establishment, it has never been in the US political establishment's interests to air ANY dirty laundry about their beards - particularly someone who had become as essential to their operation as Joe Biden.Didn't require any digging up. Trump was on record for trying to shake down Zelenski, financial records for paying hush money to a porn star and corresponding fiddling the books, keeping top secret documents after being told to return them so they had to get them themselves.air as much dirty laundry as could be dug up
Trump did many things in full view of the media and government, no one had to dig up any serendipitous, nefarious doings, it was always in full view.
Calling entries for the hush money payments "fiddling the books" is a stretch - people routinely misclassify entries, hoping to write things off that ought not be written off, and there's no likelihood the Biden family is any different. Tossing that into the mix really doesn't change the reality here: Joe Biden's family profited substantially while Joe Biden was a front man for the US political establishment. To pretend otherwise is to be willfully blind.
To excuse it with "but Trump" is to the benefit of the US political establishment, and the US political establishment doesn't need anyone's help to stomp on ordinary people - they're quite good at it, and they already have people like Joe Biden and his family helping them do it.
Most academics operate in a rarified world where their highfalutin pontification is decoupled from reality. However, ideas have real consequences. Products, political systems, and policies that are incongruent with human nature always fail... Gad Saad
-
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 104504
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
nope.
Again with the lies, in a thread about the dementia-addled Joe Biden, no less! Amazing!
Anyway, as we now know, Joe was stricken with dementia when he was "elected" in 2020. How this was allowed to go on, even to the point where the Dems in league with a complicit media were going to run dementia Joe AGAIN for another 4 years, is the height of scandal. People need to be arrested and charged, as this can never happen again in the USA.
We told yall Project 2025 wasn't real.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10471
- Joined: Apr 23rd, 2021, 12:27 pm
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
seewood wrote: ↑Dec 30th, 2024, 8:50 amI thought the republicans had the house and could and did subpoena witnesses.
Hunters laptop may or may not have had incriminating evidence on it but after he lost the chain of possession, I really doubt any information on it could be used in a trial.
Regardless, if Joe was corrupt, I'd be thinking he would have been held to task during trump's first go around at president when they had the senate and the house.
Joe becomes president after trump and his two impeachments so *bleep* for tat... didn't work out quite the way they wanted though.


"Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can transform the world." Howard Zinn
It's the simple things in life that brings joy.
It's the simple things in life that brings joy.
-
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 104504
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
rustled wrote: ↑Dec 30th, 2024, 10:55 am
As did Joe Biden - no "digging up" required. That's who this thread is actually about. Biden's cognitive impairment was in full view - his inappropriateness for office didn't need to be dug up. Joe Biden talked about how he'd got things done - oops - and when he talked about it, he was talking about using his political power to do it. And he, too, had top secret documents, although he didn't even seem to know he had some of them - they weren't even in a secure location.
Calling entries for the hush money payments "fiddling the books" is a stretch - people routinely misclassify entries, hoping to write things off that ought not be written off, and there's no likelihood the Biden family is any different. Tossing that into the mix really doesn't change the reality here: Joe Biden's family profited substantially while Joe Biden was a front man for the US political establishment. To pretend otherwise is to be willfully blind.
To excuse it with "but Trump" is to the benefit of the US political establishment, and the US political establishment doesn't need anyone's help to stomp on ordinary people - they're quite good at it, and they already have people like Joe Biden and his family helping them do it.



We told yall Project 2025 wasn't real.
-
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 104504
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: Joe Biden Discussion
And it begins:
The feeble attempt of Democrat-controlled media to try to prop up the failed and horrible legacy of Joe Biden, whose only real legacy is that he's replaced Jimmy Carter as the worst US president of the past 100 years.
The feeble attempt of Democrat-controlled media to try to prop up the failed and horrible legacy of Joe Biden, whose only real legacy is that he's replaced Jimmy Carter as the worst US president of the past 100 years.
We told yall Project 2025 wasn't real.