Hunter Biden

[seewood]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolo ... -examined/

Sidestepping the suppression of evidence won't make it go away.

The law doesn't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt before the prosecution takes over. That's not how it works for anyone else. So why set the goalposts for prosecution at "beyond a reasonable doubt" for Biden? Whether or not to prosecute Biden should depend on the same level of evidence it does for everyone else.

Whether or not to investigate should always depend on the evidence available.

The law , from what I understand of it from a crown prosecutor in the family, is before charges are laid, the prosecution wants a reasonable chance of success before taking it to court. That is the Canadian way, different in the states, I dunno.

" Whether or not to investigate should always depend on the evidence available."
I agree, so if the FBI has evidence they have found to be true, corroborated, and worthy of prosecution, then prosecute.

Why they are not doing it if they have information that is corroborated, true and factual, again, I duuno, perhaps send an email off to the FBI cause I don't have an answer. Let speculation run rampant in the meantime.

[rustled]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolo ... -examined/

Sidestepping the suppression of evidence won't make it go away.

The law doesn't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt before the prosecution takes over. That's not how it works for anyone else. So why set the goalposts for prosecution at "beyond a reasonable doubt" for Biden? Whether or not to prosecute Biden should depend on the same level of evidence it does for everyone else.

Whether or not to investigate should always depend on the evidence available.

The law , from what I understand of it from a crown prosecutor in the family, is before charges are laid, the prosecution wants a reasonable chance of success before taking it to court. That is the Canadian way, different in the states, I dunno.

Exactly. Reasonable chance of success =/= beyond a reasonable doubt.

" Whether or not to investigate should always depend on the evidence available."
I agree, so if the FBI has evidence they have found to be true, corroborated, and worthy of prosecution, then prosecute.

Why they are not doing it if they have information that is corroborated, true and factual, again, I duuno, perhaps send an email off to the FBI cause I don't have an answer. Let speculation run rampant in the meantime.

It's not up to the public to email the FBI and ask why they're suppressing some evidence and some investigations into high level political wrongdoing, and not others. Of course speculation runs rampant.

We can also apply Occam's Razor. Follow the money. Who benefits most from having information suppressed that could have kept Joe Biden out of the White House?

[rustled]

Withholding information or searches is influencing elections.

The FBI shouldn't be bothered when elections happen.

And since actively telling media outlets what information about a presidential candidate to suppress as "Russian misinformation" would most certainly influence the presidential election, these suggestions the FBI were "just" trying to avoid influencing elections won't stand up to scrutiny.
Also,

[Mazdatruck]

Is the entire US intelligence service trying to cover that up a week before a critical election?

Did the US's biggest communications network conspire to supress discussion about it?

The entire intelligence service or some people in it? And the socail networks made their own decisions internally. It was far from ordered.

Here's one for you. Is what Trump did a bad thing? Do you care?

The head of the CIA didn't get on CNN to say "the CIA says this is Russian disinformation" on his own!

Yes, the entire FBI, CIA and NSA all publically stated their organizations believed the Hunter Biden story to be "Russian disinformation".

Twitter blocked the convos, on requests of said groups.

[captkirkcanada]

How the hunter files was revenge porn .

https://youtu.be/TAQ9D3rNFJM

[The Green Barbarian]

How the hunter files was revenge porn .

https://youtu.be/TAQ9D3rNFJM

^^^^
How this is nonsense.

[Rjamer]

How the hunter files was revenge porn .

https://youtu.be/TAQ9D3rNFJM

Gee,, I wonder why the GOP perverts want so badly to see Hunter`s laptop...

[Pappywinkle]

How the hunter files was revenge porn .

https://youtu.be/TAQ9D3rNFJM

Yup, and all the right wingers who spent the weekend salivating over the Hunter Biden revenge porn distributed by QElon look like horrible and disgusting losers right now, and rightly so!

[motokelowna1]

With all the hype of a D*C-p1CKs and all the allegations of certain GOP pedoes I really think that the party of molesters are trying to change the subject ...I have never seen such a corrupt officials except for Russia ,South America etc

[The Green Barbarian]

With all the hype of a D*C-p1CKs and all the allegations of certain GOP pedoes I really think that the party of molesters are trying to change the subject ...I have never seen such a corrupt officials except for Russia ,South America etc

I agree, the Biden crime family is disgusting.

[motokelowna1]

With all the hype of a D*C-p1CKs and all the allegations of certain GOP pedoes I really think that the party of molesters are trying to change the subject ...I have never seen such a corrupt officials except for Russia ,South America etc

I agree, the Biden crime family is disgusting.

You are funny OH how come the gop still have the highest number of criminals awaiting trials .... Losers Plus

[The Green Barbarian]

[
You are funny OH

The Biden crime family is no laughing matter.

come the gop still have the highest number of criminals awaiting trials .... Losers Plus

^^^^
Off topic stupid babbling.

[The Green Barbarian]

White House in bind as Archives nears release of Hunter Biden, Burisma emails

The Biden administration faces a difficult decision early next year — whether to block the National Archives from releasing hundreds of Obama-era documents related to first son Hunter Biden and his relationship with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma while Joe Biden was vice president.

The White House has been mum about whether it will invoke executive privilege to stop papers from becoming public Feb. 28, 2023, Insider reports.

The records include 69 images and 260 email messages that mention Burisma and date back to 2014, when Hunter, now 52, had a lucrative seat on the company’s board — a shady relationship The Post exposed in a series of reports in October 2020.

The National Archives informed the Biden White House and the Obama Foundation in a Nov. 30 letter that it planned to release the records in response to a Freedom of Information Act request for vice presidential records created between May and December of 2014 that contain the word “Burisma,” Insider said.

T​he letter said “several” of the emails involved media inquiries after it was revealed in 2014 that Hunter Biden ​would accept a seat on Burisma’s board, where he was paid as much as $83,333 a month even though he had no experience in energy issues.

https://nypost.com/2022/12/15/biden-adm ... ed-report/

[The Green Barbarian]

Hunter Biden adds top Dem lawyer Abbe Lowell as House GOP probes await

First son Hunter Biden has added a high-profile Washington defense attorney whose client roster includes a who’s-who of embattled politicians to his legal team as House Republicans plan to launch investigations into his overseas business interests as soon as next month.

Abbe Lowell will be responsible for coordinating the 52-year-old Hunter’s defense during the congressional probes that will begin after Republicans take over the House in the new year.

“Hunter Biden has retained Abbe Lowell to help advise him and be part of his legal team to address the challenges he is facing,” Kevin Morris — another Hunter Biden lawyer — told NBC News, which first reported on Lowell’s retention.

“Lowell is a well-known Washington-based attorney who has represented numerous public officials and high-profile people in DOJ investigations and trials as well as congressional investigations,” Morris added. “Mr. Lowell will handle congressional investigations and general strategic advice.”

Lowell, 70, served as chief minority Council in the House of Representatives during the impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton in the late 1990s. He also successfully defended prominent Democrats John Edwards and Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) from federal corruption charges in 2012 and 2017, respectively.

During the Trump administration, Lowell represented Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, during the Russia collusion investigations by Congress and the FBI.

Most recently, Lowell was the main lawyer for Tom Barrack, a President Donald Trump supporter and fundraiser, who was found not guilty last month by a Brooklyn federal jury on charges he unlawfully acted as a foreign agent.

Republicans, who won a narrow House majority in last month’s midterm elections, have put Hunter Biden’s business dealings squarely in their sights.

https://nypost.com/2022/12/22/hunter-bi ... egal-team/

[The Green Barbarian]