Tucker Carlson hates Trump "passionately"

[d0nb]

There isn’t any non-bias reporting anywhere. Can anyone name 1 non-bias

Even for AI programs, it’s likely impossible to be completely unbiased. That’s not a major problem as long as you have the ability to differentiate between what you would prefer to be true and what actually is. Betting your own money on outcomes is a fairly reliable way to learn just how good you are at doing that.

For news, we should favor sources that have reported major events truthfully. Look to the outlets that got it mostly right about things like the Russia collusion hoax, the 2016 election, the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, inflation, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or the increasingly likely origin of COVID-19, and avoid those that have consistently and enthusiastically aided and abetted hoaxes and groupthink.

[Poindexter]

Even for AI programs, it’s likely impossible to be completely unbiased. That’s not a major problem as long as you have the ability to differentiate between what you would prefer to be true and what actually is. Betting your own money on outcomes is a fairly reliable way to learn just how good you are at doing that.

For news, we should favor sources that have reported major events truthfully. Look to the outlets that got it mostly right about things like the Russia collusion hoax, the 2016 election, the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, inflation, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or the increasingly likely origin of COVID-19, and avoid those that have consistently and enthusiastically aided and abetted hoaxes and groupthink.

Possibly the worst advice ever.

[Catsumi]

There isn’t any non-bias reporting anywhere. Can anyone name 1 non-bias

Even for AI programs, it’s likely impossible to be completely unbiased. That’s not a major problem as long as you have the ability to differentiate between what you would prefer to be true and what actually is. Betting your own money on outcomes is a fairly reliable way to learn just how good you are at doing that.

For news, we should favor sources that have reported major events truthfully. Look to the outlets that got it mostly right about things like the Russia collusion hoax, the 2016 election, the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, inflation, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or the increasingly likely origin of COVID-19, and avoid those that have consistently and enthusiastically aided and abetted hoaxes and groupthink.

Good points there, d0nb

So much of what we were told to think turned out to be just the opposite

[d0nb]

Possibly the worst advice ever.

My apologies, I didn’t intend to disturb any of the sad, hopeless cases who can’t deal with the truth. Of course, they should continue to huddle in their favorite safe spaces and gorge on Don Lemon/Joy Behar videos as they nurture their hate and paranoia.

[The Green Barbarian]

There isn’t any non-bias reporting anywhere. Can anyone name 1 non-bias

Even for AI programs, it’s likely impossible to be completely unbiased. That’s not a major problem as long as you have the ability to differentiate between what you would prefer to be true and what actually is. Betting your own money on outcomes is a fairly reliable way to learn just how good you are at doing that.

For news, we should favor sources that have reported major events truthfully. Look to the outlets that got it mostly right about things like the Russia collusion hoax, the 2016 election, the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, inflation, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or the increasingly likely origin of COVID-19, and avoid those that have consistently and enthusiastically aided and abetted hoaxes and groupthink.

Possibly the best advice ever, but I can see how it wouldn't sit well with far Left extremists sitting in their horrible echo chambers.

[The Green Barbarian]

Possibly the worst advice ever.

My apologies, I didn’t intend to disturb any of the sad, hopeless cases who can’t deal with the truth. Of course, they should continue to huddle in their favorite safe spaces and gorge on Don Lemon/Joy Behar videos as they nurture their hate and paranoia.

yes because as we know from what Don Lemon wisely counseled us - all women are past their "best before date" after they turn 50. Yes, this is the kind loser that the Leftist extremists want to keep defending. Such utter fools.

[common_sense_guy]

Unless you happen to be somewhat obtuse, it is no “secret” that Tucker dislikes Trump and some members of his family, Jared Kushner in particular. The feeling is likely entirely mutual, as Tucker can be a bit of a *bleep*.

It should be remembered that Hunter Biden wasn’t always the complete train wreck that he became after he allowed his addictions to control him. It is therefore quite natural that Carlson would have reached out to an influential friend and neighbor for a reference to help his son with his education. Acting in the best interests of his children is hardly anything to condemn him for.

Yep. Good post I agree. Most people can't put two and two together and get four. They don't know enough history and all they do is squawk what they read with no backstory or history of things

[Poindexter]

Even for AI programs, it’s likely impossible to be completely unbiased. That’s not a major problem as long as you have the ability to differentiate between what you would prefer to be true and what actually is. Betting your own money on outcomes is a fairly reliable way to learn just how good you are at doing that.

For news, we should favor sources that have reported major events truthfully. Look to the outlets that got it mostly right about things like the Russia collusion hoax, the 2016 election, the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, inflation, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or the increasingly likely origin of COVID-19, and avoid those that have consistently and enthusiastically aided and abetted hoaxes and groupthink.

Possibly the worst advice ever.

Posters like this are the very reason Tucker Carlson has to lie to them every night. If Fox reports on any of these issues in a manner that doesn't stroke their confirmation bias they change the channel to one that does.

Truth isn't what you're after, instead you want a condescending "news" source that doesn't challenge your previously held opinions and this is why we have Fox.

[65deluxe]

Possibly the worst advice ever.

Posters like this are the very reason Tucker Carlson has to lie to them every night. If Fox reports on any of these issues in a manner that doesn't stroke their confirmation bias they change the channel to one that does.

Truth isn't what you're after, instead you want a condescending "news" source that doesn't challenge your previously held opinions and this is why we have Fox.

But that appears what everyone wants. You dont watch Fox why? Because it challenges your previously held opinion. Don't deny it. Every news outlet does it share of fear mongering. How much and what flavor one choses to accept is up to them. I watch Fox because they dont accept or push what the left choses to report as "normal". CRT, men in drag reading to children, indoctrinating children, sexualizing children, the war in ukraine, divisiveness, biden...
Anyone here old enough to remember cnn in the 80s or even 90s? Compare that to what the news network offers today, then tell me there's nothing wrong with todays reporting. I havent watched msnews in at least 5 years, for the reasons stated above. Though Ive never cared for Trump the person, I liked his politics. The msm, and the gullible couldnt see past the person. I'd gladly trade mean tweets for the world we've suffered through for the last couple years. Hey, can any of you haters tell me what of Trumps politics you didnt like? Maybe it was the low inflation, or gas prices? Couldnt be the record low unemployement for women and minorities, could it? Or maybe it was the lack of war, control at the southern border, or the peace deal brokered in the middle east?

[65deluxe]

Even for AI programs, it’s likely impossible to be completely unbiased. That’s not a major problem as long as you have the ability to differentiate between what you would prefer to be true and what actually is. Betting your own money on outcomes is a fairly reliable way to learn just how good you are at doing that.

For news, we should favor sources that have reported major events truthfully. Look to the outlets that got it mostly right about things like the Russia collusion hoax, the 2016 election, the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax, inflation, Hunter Biden’s laptop, or the increasingly likely origin of COVID-19, and avoid those that have consistently and enthusiastically aided and abetted hoaxes and groupthink.

Possibly the worst advice ever.

More AI News...
"The New York Post reports that according to a report from the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, titled “Danger in the Machine: The Perils of Political and Demographic Biases Embedded in AI Systems,” the massively popular ChatGPT AI chatbot displays a significant bias against conservatives."

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/03/ ... tives-men/

[Poindexter]

I do watch Fox because I think it's entertaining to watch what lie they're currently trying to dupe their audience with. Prime time Fox is entertaining but that's all they are and have ever claimed to be - entertainment. Anyone silly enough to actually believe it's legitimate news only demonstrates a level of gullibility that's quite frankly kind of sad.

[the truth]

I do watch Fox because I think it's entertaining to watch what lie they're currently trying to dupe their audience with. Prime time Fox is entertaining but that's all they are and have ever claimed to be - entertainment. Anyone silly enough to actually believe it's legitimate news only demonstrates a level of gullibility that's quite frankly kind of sad.

cnn is no better

[Glacier]

There isn’t any non-bias reporting anywhere. Can anyone name 1 non-bias

Tucker is pretty non-biased. If you can't tell he hates Trump by what he says on air, then yes, that's a sign he's a really good journalist. Bad journalists telegraph who they vote for.

Possibly the worst advice ever.

Here is the best advice ever... get your news from a variety of sources...

[65deluxe]

I do watch Fox because I think it's entertaining to watch what lie they're currently trying to dupe their audience with. Prime time Fox is entertaining but that's all they are and have ever claimed to be - entertainment. Anyone silly enough to actually believe it's legitimate news only demonstrates a level of gullibility that's quite frankly kind of sad.

Thanks for basically proving my point... "You dont watch Fox why? Because it challenges your previously held opinion."

[The Green Barbarian]

Thanks for basically proving my point... "You dont watch Fox why? Because it challenges your previously held opinion."

Exactly. Heaven forbid any of the extreme Leftists here ever venture outside of their echo chamber.