WTC Building #7
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Dec 21st, 2014, 9:21 am
Re: WTC Building #7
sanfish wrote:^^^^^^ if you don't understand the word irony , I don't know how else to explain it to you. And by "started" I meant you were the one ( we can go back over the pages together if you like) that first used an "ad hominem" attack ( an attack on the messenger when can't think up an attack on the message) to "nit pik" a poster for their grammar while making several ( not one ) grammatical mistakes. Regardless ( you probably best know it as "irregardless ") I have no more time to waste explaining "irony" and "numerical order " to you. Carry on, the floor is yours
Edit to add: if your desire to "help educate" other posters is genuine , I find it best to lead by example ( you know so someone can't "nit pik" the hypocritical nature of the post nor the obvious irony )
( you know so someone ????
Where does that form of the ENGLISH language come from?
Irregardless
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Look up irregardless in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Irregardless is a word commonly used in place of regardless or irrespective, which has caused controversy since the early twentieth century, though the word appeared in print as early as 1795.[1] Most dictionaries list it as "nonstandard" or "incorrect" usage, and recommend that "regardless" should be used instead.[2][3][4]
ad hominem
ad hominem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, means responding to arguments by attacking a person's character, rather ...
My comments are directed at the language, NOT the person. IF that person's inability to use the English language and IQ are comparable, then they shouldn't the use of the internet and embarrass themselves publicly.
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Mar 27th, 2006, 11:32 am
Re: WTC Building #7
ValB58 wrote:
My comments are directed at the language, NOT the person. IF that person's inability to use the English language and IQ are comparable, then they shouldn't the use of the internet and embarrass themselves publicly.
Haha. Your comments also included At least the same ( if not more) mistakes than the post your were quoting .
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Dec 21st, 2014, 9:21 am
Re: WTC Building #7
ValB58 wrote:
My comments are directed at the language, NOT the person. IF that person's inability to use the English language and IQ are comparable, then they shouldn't the use of the internet and embarrass themselves publicly.
sanfish wrote:Haha. Your comments also included At least the same ( if not more) mistakes than the post your were quoting .
PROVE IT.
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Mar 27th, 2006, 11:32 am
Re: WTC Building #7
^^^^^^^ *bleep* @prove it. It's in your own post. I'm sorry, "you win". I just can't bring myself to have what is supposed to be an adult conversation with a guy that has a comic book character for an avatar. Haha
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Dec 21st, 2014, 9:21 am
Re: WTC Building #7
sanfish wrote:^^^^^^^ *bleep* @prove it. It's in your own post. I'm sorry, "you win". I just can't bring myself to have what is supposed to be an adult conversation with a guy that has a comic book character for an avatar. Haha
You are judging me by my avatar......WOW! I am truly impressed with your investigative abilities.
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Mar 27th, 2006, 11:32 am
Re: WTC Building #7
Ha you impress easy. Make no mistake, I judged you long before I noticed your picture. It was based on your character not your "character". Lol
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Dec 21st, 2014, 9:21 am
Re: WTC Building #7
sanfish wrote:Ha you impress easy. Make no mistake, I judged you long before I noticed your picture. It was based on your character not your "character". Lol
OH? GEEE....you hurt my feeling.....I had only one left and you hurt it...... Twit.
- maryjane48
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 17124
- Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm
Re: WTC Building #7
my nipples are erect
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Mar 27th, 2006, 11:32 am
Re: WTC Building #7
lakevixen wrote:my nipples are erect
Go on....
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9481
- Joined: Apr 3rd, 2008, 9:22 am
Re: WTC Building #7
My hovercraft is full of eels.
Health forum: Health, well-being, medicine, aging, digital currency enslavement, depopulation conspiracy.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Mar 27th, 2006, 11:32 am
Re: WTC Building #7
LordEd wrote:My hovercraft is full of eels.
Well played sir. Well played. Use those words on any thread you want to "lock" lol
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Dec 21st, 2014, 9:21 am
Re: WTC Building #7
lakevixen wrote:my nipples are erect
Goes to prove, how/where and who gets the, "Lowest in Class" award. ADD that to the "Least likely to succeed" and the "Most likely to create 12 ft#'s of vacuum to attract a mate, and the capacity of the fireplace mantle to display these trophies, would extrapolate to.......... _____________________?
You do the math.
- maryjane48
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 17124
- Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm
Re: WTC Building #7
Goes to prove, how/where and who gets the, "Lowest in Class" award. ADD that to the "Least likely to succeed" and the "Most likely to create 12 ft#'s of vacuum to attract a mate, and the capacity of the fireplace mantle to display these trophies, would extrapolate to.......... _____________________?
You do the math.
and the clown award for threatening people on a public forum goes to ................................
you do the math
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Dec 21st, 2014, 9:21 am
Re: WTC Building #7
Goes to prove, how/where and who gets the, "Lowest in Class" award. ADD that to the "Least likely to succeed" and the "Most likely to create 12 ft#'s of vacuum to attract a mate, and the capacity of the fireplace mantle to display these trophies, would extrapolate to.......... _____________________?
You do the math.
and the clown award for threatening people on a public forum goes to ................................
lakevixen wrote:you do the math
Where's the "threat"?