Israeli Doctors Cure the symptoms of CV-19?

[alanjh595]

Unless I'm missing your point.

Say there is a man with a grenade who is going to throw it at 3 people and one person you can push infront of the grenade which will save the three people. If you do nothing the one person lives. If you push the person they die and the 3 are saved. Nobody else is hurt in either choice.

Do you push the person?

Most people change their answer if the 3 people are their family and the one person is a stranger.

We're doing the push one innocent person into harms way to save others by somewhat forcing the vaccine.

The true heroes are the ones that are willing to jump on that grenade to save all the others.
If you push someone on that grenade, you are a murder, if you fail to act, you are guilty of manslaughter.

[Sparki55]

The true heroes are the ones that are willing to jump on that grenade to save all the others.
If you push someone on that grenade, you are a murder, if you fail to act, you are guilty of manslaughter.

Wasn't an option in my thought experiment. If you change the parameters the point is missed.

If you fail to act you are not guilty of manslaughter.

[alanjh595]

The true heroes are the ones that are willing to jump on that grenade to save all the others.
If you push someone on that grenade, you are a murder, if you fail to act, you are guilty of manslaughter.

Wasn't an option in my thought experiment. If you change the parameters the point is missed.

If you fail to act you are not guilty of manslaughter.

So therefore; a hypothetical query with limited choices, no repercussions and that don't include societal laws.

No sense to the question then, is there ?

[rustled]

The true heroes are the ones that are willing to jump on that grenade to save all the others.
If you push someone on that grenade, you are a murder, if you fail to act, you are guilty of manslaughter.

Wasn't an option in my thought experiment. If you change the parameters the point is missed.

If you fail to act you are not guilty of manslaughter.

"First, do no harm."

[Sparki55]

So therefore; a hypothetical query with limited choices, no repercussions and that don't include societal laws.

No sense to the question then, is there ?

Lol, no, not the case. Sorry you don't get it.

[Kelownamade]

Wasn't an option in my thought experiment. If you change the parameters the point is missed.

If you fail to act you are not guilty of manslaughter.

"First, do no harm."

Doctors mostly do harm. All they know how to do is throw drugs at problems created by lifestyle and diet. How can drugs fix those problems? they can't.

[LordEd]

Doctors mostly do harm. All they know how to do is throw drugs at problems created by lifestyle and diet. How can drugs fix those problems? they can't.

Why are you supporting an evil drug pushing er doctor as your source anyway?