Penticton lawyer disciplined
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Jan 2nd, 2006, 10:42 am
Penticton lawyer disciplined
http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/news/ ... 957ab.html
http://www.castanet.net/edition/news-st ... htm#140315
A fine?! He only got a fine?! This is appalling. The first will was wrong but having the second will written clearly showed that he KNEW it was wrong.
http://www.castanet.net/edition/news-st ... htm#140315
A fine?! He only got a fine?! This is appalling. The first will was wrong but having the second will written clearly showed that he KNEW it was wrong.
-
- The Wagon Master
- Posts: 54420
- Joined: Apr 21st, 2005, 10:46 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
Chances are good the law society will pull his license too. So he will be out of business. Not that anyone would go to him anymore anyway.
Never argue with a fool as those watching might not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
Mark Twain
-
- Admiral HMS Castanet
- Posts: 27249
- Joined: Jun 1st, 2006, 5:42 pm
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
Gee, he was just following his son's example by voting himself a raise. Doesn't everybody get to do that ?
“Debating an idiot is like trying to play chess with a pigeon — it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.”
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8084
- Joined: Nov 25th, 2010, 8:44 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
Bsuds wrote:Chances are good the law society will pull his license too. So he will be out of business. Not that anyone would go to him anymore anyway.
The law society just fined him. If they were going to pull his license, they would have done at the same time they levied the fine.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Oct 29th, 2012, 1:51 pm
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
I would dare say this is "criminal" and his license should be pulled, no ifs and or buts.
-
- Generalissimo Postalot
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Mar 7th, 2010, 10:45 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
That's pretty scummy.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 14212
- Joined: Aug 12th, 2009, 7:13 pm
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
The Law Society of BC is the regulatory body for the BC legal profession. Guided by the Legal Profession Act, the Society licenses individuals to practice law in BC, hears complaints regarding the conduct of lawyers, and administers discipline, when appropriate.
The Discipline Committee reviews complaints concerning lawyers or articled students that are referred by Law Society staff, the Complainants' Review Committee or any other committee. The Discipline Committee may dismiss a complaint, instruct staff to make further investigation, order a conduct review of a lawyer or recommend that a citation for a formal hearing be issued against a lawyer. The Committee also considers conditional admissions of discipline violations. - See more at: http://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/page.cfm?ci ... OY5nb.dpuf
interesting that the law society is formed by lawyers to discipline other lawyers. no wonder the so called discipline action taken against this lawyer was meaningless and lenient.
such malfeasance should have resulted in immediate expulsion from the law society and loss of license.
-
- Übergod
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Dec 16th, 2010, 2:48 pm
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
now the question is, is this a negative business review? Semantics...
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9531
- Joined: Sep 10th, 2006, 11:12 pm
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
Now, I do know Charlie. And only in a professional setting.
I realize what he did, appears to be wrong. But don't miss the part of the story that the lady in question is nuts. She was committed and Charlie did get her released. Once she was released, a new lawyer sent him a "no contact" order. I'd be looking at that new lawyers intentions, before Charlie's.
Maybe she did want to give him a part of her estate, once she passed? Maybe she appreciated things he did for her?
His only admitted mistake was preparing the Will of a client that named him as one of the beneficiaries, and then changed the beneficiary to his wifes name, because he realized the conflict. Kind of shady work, but hardly criminal.
I realize what he did, appears to be wrong. But don't miss the part of the story that the lady in question is nuts. She was committed and Charlie did get her released. Once she was released, a new lawyer sent him a "no contact" order. I'd be looking at that new lawyers intentions, before Charlie's.
Maybe she did want to give him a part of her estate, once she passed? Maybe she appreciated things he did for her?
His only admitted mistake was preparing the Will of a client that named him as one of the beneficiaries, and then changed the beneficiary to his wifes name, because he realized the conflict. Kind of shady work, but hardly criminal.
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Jan 2nd, 2006, 10:42 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
It doesn't have to be criminal to be disbarred. What he did was unethical.
If a client wants to leave you money when you're their lawyer, you refuse. You encourage them to give it to relatives or to charity. You do not ever profit from a client relationship. If you do, you're unethical.
If a client wants to leave you money when you're their lawyer, you refuse. You encourage them to give it to relatives or to charity. You do not ever profit from a client relationship. If you do, you're unethical.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9531
- Joined: Sep 10th, 2006, 11:12 pm
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
exFarmerS wrote:It doesn't have to be criminal to be disbarred. What he did was unethical.
If a client wants to leave you money when you're their lawyer, you refuse. You encourage them to give it to relatives or to charity. You do not ever profit from a client relationship. If you do, you're unethical.
Yes, you refuse, and then you tell them to talk to another lawyer, before they make their decision, Maybe he did give her those suggestions.
How do you know that they didn't have a personal relationship? It may have not been just a lawyer/client relationship.
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Jan 2nd, 2006, 10:42 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
onestop67 wrote:
How do you know that they didn't have a personal relationship? It may have not been just a lawyer/client relationship.
If they did, she should have had another lawyer.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8084
- Joined: Nov 25th, 2010, 8:44 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
exFarmerS wrote:
How do you know that they didn't have a personal relationship? It may have not been just a lawyer/client relationship.
If they did, she should have had another lawyer.
So according to your strict rules of fiduciary responsibility, a lawyer could not even draft a will for his/her own parents if proper disclosure is made to all potential beneficiaries of the estate? Just asking.
And if you think that would be ok, what is the difference if they are non related but there was proper disclosure to all potential beneficiaries? As far as I am concerned, the mistake that Charlie made was not including a statement in the will that he drafted the will and was also a named beneficiary. That would disclose to anyone who might have an interest that they might have grounds to challenge the will if they thought the estate was being unfairly distributed.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Jan 2nd, 2006, 10:42 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
I think the simplest thing, if everything was truly above board, would be to say "Mrs Smith, that is SO lovely that you want to leave me money but just to make things all look kosher, let's send you to the lawyer down the road to draw up that will". And then to compound it with the second will trying to hide it all made it worse.
I used to have to spend a lot of time explaining to people what a conflict of interest is/was. And a big part of that training was also to avoid the "appearance" of a conflict of interest. The easiest way to explain it was to say "What if this appeared on the front of the newspaper? Would it look fine or would it make a lot of people doubt your ethics?". It doesn't matter if you're a public official and your brother-in-law is the best guy to give the contract to. It doesn't look good so you should bring in a 3rd party to make the final determination.
So I don't care if you're a lawyer, a cop, a health care worker, an accountant, a public servant, or a judge. You should abide by a code of ethics that the average Joe that doesn't deal with people's lives/money may not need. Although I think everyone should have a moral code that would see this as an unwise thing to do.
I used to have to spend a lot of time explaining to people what a conflict of interest is/was. And a big part of that training was also to avoid the "appearance" of a conflict of interest. The easiest way to explain it was to say "What if this appeared on the front of the newspaper? Would it look fine or would it make a lot of people doubt your ethics?". It doesn't matter if you're a public official and your brother-in-law is the best guy to give the contract to. It doesn't look good so you should bring in a 3rd party to make the final determination.
So I don't care if you're a lawyer, a cop, a health care worker, an accountant, a public servant, or a judge. You should abide by a code of ethics that the average Joe that doesn't deal with people's lives/money may not need. Although I think everyone should have a moral code that would see this as an unwise thing to do.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8084
- Joined: Nov 25th, 2010, 8:44 am
Re: Penticton lawyer disciplined
exFarmerS wrote:I think the simplest thing, if everything was truly above board, would be to say "Mrs Smith, that is SO lovely that you want to leave me money but just to make things all look kosher, let's send you to the lawyer down the road to draw up that will". And then to compound it with the second will trying to hide it all made it worse.
I used to have to spend a lot of time explaining to people what a conflict of interest is/was. And a big part of that training was also to avoid the "appearance" of a conflict of interest. The easiest way to explain it was to say "What if this appeared on the front of the newspaper? Would it look fine or would it make a lot of people doubt your ethics?". It doesn't matter if you're a public official and your brother-in-law is the best guy to give the contract to. It doesn't look good so you should bring in a 3rd party to make the final determination.
So I don't care if you're a lawyer, a cop, a health care worker, an accountant, a public servant, or a judge. You should abide by a code of ethics that the average Joe that doesn't deal with people's lives/money may not need. Although I think everyone should have a moral code that would see this as an unwise thing to do.
Yes, and that moral code would have been satisfied by the simple disclosure that the preparer of the will was also a beneficiary. In the end it is all about proper disclosure is it not? It is not unlike the requirement of a real estate agent to disclose a personal interest in a listing of property. It's a "heads up" to anyone that might be interested.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.