Strategic voting pitfalls
-
- The Pilgrim
- Posts: 38591
- Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
George+ wrote:In Kelowna Lake Country the NDP actually doubled their vote.
Are you on glue? The NDP got 21% in 2011, and 14% in 2015. Stratetic voting was an utter failure because ridings where the you were supposed to vote NDP saw the Liberal support go up just as much as in ridings where you were supposed to vote Liberal. Case and point, Cariboo-Prince George saw the Liberal support up over 500% even though the NDP was supposed to take it. This split the vote, and Conservatives won anyway.
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
- Douglas Murray
-
- Übergod
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Nov 2nd, 2011, 7:46 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
George+ wrote:In Kelowna Lake Country the NDP actually doubled their vote.
Glacier wrote:Are you on glue? The NDP got 21% in 2011, and 14% in 2015.
It seems that George must be living in a parallel universe or something. There must be some explanation for how he can be so completely wrong on such a consistent basis. It's actually quite comical.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9019
- Joined: Apr 3rd, 2008, 9:22 am
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
http://www.cbc.ca/news2/interactives/results-2015/
2011: 34,566(57%) CON, 13322(22%) NDP, 7069(12%) LIB, 5265(9%) GRN
vs
2015: 25512(40%) CON, 9044(14%) NDP, 29614 (46%) LIB, 0 (0%) GRN
Had to check if the increased voter turnout helped george, but no. 9044 (14%) is still 4278 less votes less than 13322 (22%).
2011: 34,566(57%) CON, 13322(22%) NDP, 7069(12%) LIB, 5265(9%) GRN
vs
2015: 25512(40%) CON, 9044(14%) NDP, 29614 (46%) LIB, 0 (0%) GRN
Had to check if the increased voter turnout helped george, but no. 9044 (14%) is still 4278 less votes less than 13322 (22%).
Health forum: Health, well-being, medicine, aging, digital currency enslavement, depopulation conspiracy.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
It is the actual votes that you need to look at.
The NDP maintained their usual approx. 10, 000 votes.
The Libs went from 5000 to about 30, 000.
Most of that actually came from the Conservatives and not the Green or NDP.
Some Conservatives, it seems, do function in a parallel Liberal/Con universe!
The NDP maintained their usual approx. 10, 000 votes.
The Libs went from 5000 to about 30, 000.
Most of that actually came from the Conservatives and not the Green or NDP.
Some Conservatives, it seems, do function in a parallel Liberal/Con universe!
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
Even if you add in all the 2011 Green votes and a few thousand NDP votes,
it is not close to the Liberal increase.
(I think I incorrectly used a Lib. stat.)
The point...massive desertion by the Cons.
it is not close to the Liberal increase.
(I think I incorrectly used a Lib. stat.)
The point...massive desertion by the Cons.
-
- Übergod
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Jul 11th, 2007, 12:37 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
Conservative vote count dropped by 26%, while the NDP count dropped by over 30%. Seems the NDP were hit harder by desertion than anyone else.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9019
- Joined: Apr 3rd, 2008, 9:22 am
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
George+ wrote:It is the actual votes that you need to look at.
The NDP maintained their usual approx. 10, 000 votes.
The Libs went from 5000 to about 30, 000.
Most of that actually came from the Conservatives and not the Green or NDP.
Some Conservatives, it seems, do function in a parallel Liberal/Con universe!
In Kelowna-Lake country? Where are you getting your numbers?
Actual NDP votes 2011: 13322.
Actual NDP votes 2015: 9044.
9044 is less than 13322 . Go ask a teacher.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Health forum: Health, well-being, medicine, aging, digital currency enslavement, depopulation conspiracy.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
If you want to discuss anything real, you're in the wrong place.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
Okey..
The Liberals gained 22, 000 votes.
Those did not all come from the NDP and Greens.
Conservativs massively switched, also.
This is one of the widest margins in Canada.
Why?
The Liberals gained 22, 000 votes.
Those did not all come from the NDP and Greens.
Conservativs massively switched, also.
This is one of the widest margins in Canada.
Why?
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 17124
- Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
39.5% of them, anyway
your math is waaaaaay off . the ndp , the bloc and greens are happy to that herr harper is ki ked to the curb .your boi lost
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3702
- Joined: May 12th, 2009, 4:54 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
Can anybody answer this question?
What is the problem with strategic voting if in your own opinion ensuring one person doesn't get the job is the best decision? Freedom itself should mean you can do this however you like to, without some arbitrary rule or expectation to side with just one party.
What is the problem with strategic voting if in your own opinion ensuring one person doesn't get the job is the best decision? Freedom itself should mean you can do this however you like to, without some arbitrary rule or expectation to side with just one party.
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Jul 13th, 2012, 10:09 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
We all can vote the way we want, common sense for strategic voting goes a long way for those that chose that route.
-
- The Pilgrim
- Posts: 38591
- Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
StraitTalk wrote:Can anybody answer this question?
What is the problem with strategic voting if in your own opinion ensuring one person doesn't get the job is the best decision? Freedom itself should mean you can do this however you like to, without some arbitrary rule or expectation to side with just one party.
Unless you're George+, there's absolutely nothing wrong with strategic voting.
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
- Douglas Murray
-
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 78855
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
maryjane48 wrote:your math is waaaaaay off . the ndp , the bloc and greens are happy to that herr harper is ki ked to the curb .your boi lost
If the NDP, Bloc-heads and Greens are happy with the results of that election, then they all should disband their parties right now.
"The western far Left is habitually the most stupid, naive people you can imagine. They come up with these really goofy constructs and it's all about feeling good about yourself." - James Carville
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: Strategic voting pitfalls
And join the Liberals,
with a few percs.
Agree.
with a few percs.
Agree.