A 'Change Election'
-
- Übergod
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Jun 3rd, 2008, 11:41 am
Re: A 'Change Election'
The original headline was published because Keith Baldrey is a BC Liberal zealot..........period.
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 17124
- Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
Urbane wrote:Good for Andrew Weaver. I don't agree with all of his policies but he's a principled guy.
yea principiled like mitt romney was . elizabeth may must be embarrased with this fool .
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2007, 7:41 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
The rise of the Greens means change. From Keith Baldrey:
For the first time in more than two decades, a third political party appears poised to potentially play a critical role in determining the outcome of a B.C. election.
The B.C. Green Party, buoyed by a strong performance by their leader Andrew Weaver in the televised leaders’ debate, seems ready to flex some electoral muscle not seen by a third party since the 1996 election.
- See more at: http://www.nsnews.com/opinion/columnist ... uCOFY.dpuf
-
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 80859
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: A 'Change Election'
maryjane48 wrote: . elizabeth may must be embarrased with this fool .
The last person that should ever be embarrassed by anyone else is the drunken bozo Elizabeth May.
"The western far Left is habitually the most stupid, naive people you can imagine. They come up with these really goofy constructs and it's all about feeling good about yourself." - James Carville
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
The Greens can only be spoilers in this election.
They have too far to go to win many seats.
A stronger Clark majority is a likelihood if the Greens strongly pull NDP votes.
They have too far to go to win many seats.
A stronger Clark majority is a likelihood if the Greens strongly pull NDP votes.
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2007, 7:41 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
George+ wrote:The Greens can only be spoilers in this election.
They have too far to go to win many seats.
A stronger Clark majority is a likelihood if the Greens strongly pull NDP votes.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
Go for it.
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2007, 7:41 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
George+ wrote:Go for it.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
No surprise.
If they win you can sit back and watch the debt pile up.
If they win you can sit back and watch the debt pile up.
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2007, 7:41 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
George+ wrote:No surprise.
If they win you can sit back and watch the debt pile up.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
Jeez, Urbane...recognize some priorities.
No Site C . No Deas bridge.
Equals better Education and Health Care.
Hope you were not confused when you voted!
No Site C . No Deas bridge.
Equals better Education and Health Care.
Hope you were not confused when you voted!
-
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 80859
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: A 'Change Election'
George+ wrote:No surprise.
If they win you can sit back and watch the debt pile up.
if the NDP win we can sit back and watch the number of people forced into welfare pile up. Just like last time the NDP were in power.
"The western far Left is habitually the most stupid, naive people you can imagine. They come up with these really goofy constructs and it's all about feeling good about yourself." - James Carville
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2007, 7:41 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
George+ wrote:Jeez, Urbane...recognize some priorities.
No Site C . No Deas bridge.
Equals better Education and Health Care.
Hope you were not confused when you voted!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9189
- Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
George+ wrote:Jeez, Urbane...recognize some priorities.
No Site C . No Deas bridge.
Equals better Education and Health Care.
Hope you were not confused when you voted!
Our education performance is just fine compared to most places, and the BCTF doesn't really need any more income to go spend in Mexico, while they dream up new ways to fleece their employers.
“Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost" - Tolkien
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10021
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: A 'Change Election'
Obviously you do not know the BCTF.
Go, Crosby!
Go, Crosby!