The "Cost" of Cancer

Health, well-being, medicine, aging.
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

I`ll play bait and switch for little longer with ya!! No doubt your a Saint! Here are some real Saints. The cost of CANCER!
http://repurposingdrugs101.com/
https://cureswithinreach.org/
https://cureswithinreach.org/stakeholders/research-institutions-2018

Please try and follow along what I have been talking about in previous repurposing drugs posts. Saving lives and CASH!!!!!!!
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72203
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by Fancy »

Avoiding the questions I see. You do know you're not posting anything that people aren't generally aware of.

You are so adamant that fenbendazole has been used in human clinical trials yet can't come up with a single article. I wonder why?
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
36Drew
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2722
Joined: Mar 29th, 2009, 3:32 pm

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by 36Drew »

Fancy wrote:Avoiding the questions I see. You do know you're not posting anything that people aren't generally aware of.

You are so adamant that fenbendazole has been used in human clinical trials yet can't come up with a single article. I wonder why?


Here's a lovely review of Chris Woollams' book - https://josephinejones.wordpress.com/20 ... -woollams/

Interesting to note that, while a successful advertising executive, Chris Woollams readily admits that he's not a medical doctor nor a medical practitioner.

I'm not sure that I would put much stock in the alternative treatments presented by his CancerActive organization either. https://josephinejones.wordpress.com/20 ... ceractive/ . In fact, CancerActive's site appears to be a vehicle to sell Woollams' own publications as well as wares through the naturals store that he operates. It sounds as though he's using his marketing/advertising background to his advantage - in an incredibly predatory fashion.

Just as you've called out SeaHawk for, Woollams is notorious for not citing any research nor qualifying his own claims. It would appear his followers are using the same tactics.
I'd like to change your mind, but I don't have a fresh diaper.
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72203
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by Fancy »

I've spent numerous hours researching and have limited knowledge in the medical field which has inspired me. i have read clinical studies since high school which (funny enough) includes veterinary journals as well as cancer studies. I've lost friends and family and have had scary diagnosis myself. I do not succumb to theories or supposed treatments or any blogs or youtubes. I will accede to scientific studies or even those that don't think you should buy their current book or treatment. There is a lot to learn in the scientific community and I'm game.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

[url]https://abc7chicago.com/health/repurposed-drug-gives-woman-with-cancer-the-gift-of-life/3633457/[url]
Just the facts. People are alive alive because of a repurposed drugs. With very minimal side effects. Here are John Hopkins DOCTORS!!! Quote
Searching the literature, they found reports that fenbendazole had been shown to inhibit cancer growth.
John Hopkins doctors!!!!! QUOTE ------We screened a lot of drugs in this family of compounds, and it was mebendazole that worked best,” says Gallia. “This is what we’d been looking for. Mebenzadole the human form of the drug Febenzadole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Clinical trial now underway!!! Gonna be hard to debunk this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can`t wait!!!!
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/publications/doorways_to_discovery/files/sebindoc/o/i/E20FF6E7CB00F25F1ED9927C2946478F.pdf
White shiny lab coats and everythin. !!!!!!!
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72203
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by Fancy »

I didn't read anything about
the drug has already gone through human clinical trials
.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
Posts: 70708
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by Queen K »

I was told of a family friend battling cancer.

ONE pill costs her $500

How is that not highway robbery when we are encouraged to donate for "the cure" all the time.
Free money to big Pharma and research and trials just so that they can come up with $500 pills.
Get your kids to donate their birthday money, Christmas money - or maybe not get them to, but they feel guilted into doing it.
and everyone says, "Awwwwww, what a sweet gesture."
That's because kids aren't looking at the BIG Picture, that there is no cure, and as long as people can be bilked out of $500 per pill, what is the incentive?

Seriously, where is the incentive?

So tell me about the "cost" when this ONE family is mainstreaming that kind of money into the veins of Big Pharma, I'll bet dozens of families are, and more than that too.

NOPE, til to bring in regulations to protect from gouging.
As WW3 develops, no one is going to be dissing the "preppers." What have you done?
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

Do you realize by now I am not your enemy in this discussion. I have posted and proved everything provable with the posts regarding Cancer therapy. I feel bad for people that are suffering with CANCER! I have plenty of more facts to post. I promise at the end you will understand. Please again READ
ALL OF WHAT I POST! Do you think I enjoy THE NEGATIVITY! I used to have a condition called Cognitive Dissonance. I was loaded with it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance I`m glad CD is gone from me for years now.
1. Tell me or anybody suffering from Cancer why they should use today`s cancer treatment????
2. Why after all these years of Cancer research and billions of $$$$ are we still in diapers as far as a cure???
3. Why are whistle blowers treated with such hatred?????????????? Who really is guarding the chicken coup?
4. I truly hope at the end of this banter we all will come to a solid conclusive awakening to repurposing drugs that actually make people better on this planet!
https://www.askdrmaxwell.com/2015/08/mebendazole-from-antiparasitic-to-cancer-cure/

John
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

Queen K . You are spot on. Run for this run for that, get kids now on board with this BS. Usually corporation instigated. They want us to believe what we are sending money to is making a difference. MOST human beings have empathy and care about one another. They know this. So on the game gets played. $500.00 a pill. How many piggy banks raided for those pills. :-X

John
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
Posts: 70708
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by Queen K »

O h I know. Cycling, running, jogging, lemonade stands.

I think bilking kids of their money is child abuse when it goes to the unwinnable game of cancer research.
For whom is the research going towards? Because it isn't the middle classes or the poor.

And none of this post or the last one is new. I've said these words in other threads and I still think they're true.
As WW3 develops, no one is going to be dissing the "preppers." What have you done?
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

[url]Mebendazole kills cancer cells, even those that are unresponsive to other chemotherapy, without causing harm to normal cells, and with little or no side effects.[/url] Maybe this comment should raise eyebrows again???? I don`t care where the truth comes from just the truth thanks! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZAp1Hdrm74 All starts with drugs that Big F. never knew had anti cancer benefits. Whoops Big P. Knew. Now how to cover it up??? They took Mebenzadole off the market in 2011. WHY???

John
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

The Good and greatest men and women of medicine.They kept the oath!!!https://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bs-xpm-2014-05-09-bs-hs-pinworm-cancer-drug-20140506-story.html
$2.00 to $3.00 a pill.
[url]When the mice at Johns Hopkins wouldn't grow tumors despite repeated efforts, the researchers noticed that this group came with a warning: They had been treated for pinworm with a drug that could interfere with experiments. Reviewing medical literature, they learned the parasite medicine — Fenbendazole — could inhibit cancer growth.[/url]
John
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

[url]This kind of research is getting more popular," Liu said. "I think our studies, as well as others along the way, have convinced more people to do this. ... Cancer is the No. 1 or 2 enemy for the human race, and this is a golden time to discover new drugs."[/url]
[urlhe most promising drug found so far is itraconazole, used to treat toenail fungus. It inhibits blood vessel growth and is being investigated as a treatment for macular degeneration, which causes vision loss, as well as breast, skin, lung and prostate cance][/url]
https://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bs-xpm-2014-05-09-bs-hs-pinworm-cancer-drug-20140506-story.html

Whats not to love about these discoveries and great researchers !!!!!

John
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72203
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by Fancy »

So far there have been few side effects, but low doses also haven't obstructed the tumors.
. What has happened when the doses have been larger? Has it even worked on people?
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
seahawks2884
Fledgling
Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 9th, 2006, 12:10 am

Re: The "Cost" of Cancer

Post by seahawks2884 »

seahawks2884 wrote:Maybe this man has the answer to cancer costs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=14&v=HYILnjc_wuY
His story complete.
https://www.mycancerstory.rocks/
How does it work???????
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-30158-6

Have an open mind. Please share everywhere!!!!

John
Post Reply

Return to “Health”