Immigration Ponzi Scheme

[Vacancyrate]

Just a heads up.

The Federal Liberal Government of Canada lowered their CRS criteria (Comprehensive Ranking System) which ranks immigrant applicants based on factors like education, work experience, language proficiency.

Lower CRS cutoff scores = lower "quality" candidates being offered admission.

Justin Trudeau dropped it from 450 to 75. Government is saying we'll take anyone right now.

Tim Horton's can't find workers!



Now have a look at the Express Entry invitations.



If you think it's tough finidng decent work and a affordable place to live it's only going to get worse.

Remember - you are a Nazi if you question any of this policy.

[Babba_not_Gump]

OMG, what comes out of Ottawa just gets more and more depressing.

I had to look up Immigration Through Express Entry,
The application process for skilled immigrants who want to settle in Canada permanently and take part in our economy.
What this is telling me, they want (not very) skilled immigrants. Maybe just some dunderheads that will vote for the guy that got them here.

[Even Steven]

Well, Canadians better start reproducing at higher rate to make mass immigration unnecessary...

[Boosted632]

Well, Canadians start reproducing at higher rate to make mass immigration unnecessary...

Why would anyone want to bring children into this nightmare the immigrants can have it its already a mess keep drivving it into the ground

[Even Steven]

Why would anyone want to bring children into this nightmare the immigrants can have it its already a mess keep drivving it into the ground

I take it you're a "glass half empty" kind of person...

[Vacancyrate]

Well, Canadians better start reproducing at higher rate to make mass immigration unnecessary...

Hence the title "Ponzi scheme".

Canadians are not having babies because houses cost a million dollars and the median wage is around 38,000/year in Canada. So we bring in immigrants (import people and give them credit cards and a mortgage) and then their children dont have kids because it's so expensive here.

The more immigrants we bring in - the more immigrants we have to bring in!

Instead of plugging the hole with immigrant chewing gum, how about we actually fix the hole?

Additionally - we are STEALING able-body workers from other countries, which only makes them more dependent on Canada for aid and help in the future and prevents them from improving their own countries. The only people left in Mexico are the disabled, women and children!

This is what a 75 score is and what it takes to get into Canada.

FREE MEDICAL CARE AND CANADIAN WELFARE FOR ILLITERATE 45 YEAR OLDS

[Vacancyrate]

^^^ And to add to that....The best and easiest way for him to destroy anglo Canada is through- immigration. He knows Canadians don't have the nads to go against the popular PC grain.
Trouble is that the Cons don't care....they would giv'er away just as quick.

Just think about how the media and the Liberals/Conservatives/NDP classified the People Party's position on immigrantion.

Now we have a destroyed economy and double digit employment and we're RAMPING UP how many unemployed, illiterate immigrants we're going to import? It stands to reason most people would question such actions as this is a strictly a economic issue and racism has nothing to do with it.

However if you resist this policy the idpol hammer falls on your head, you bigot!

[Even Steven]

Canadians are not having babies because houses cost a million dollars and the median wage is around 38,000/year in Canada.

That's a load of baloney


The higher the standards of living, the less are reproduction rates. If financial worries were stopping people from having babies, then all of Africa, Asia, and South America would go extinct. But it's the other way around- North America and Europe are not reproducing and rest of the world are reproducing.

People in poorer countries are having babies while living 6 people in a 2 br apartments. Ever been outside of Canada, lol?

[Vacancyrate]

The higher the standards of living, the less are reproduction rates. If financial worries were stopping people from having babies, then all of Africa, Asia, and South America would go extinct.

The baby boom after WWII.

Free houses for vets, awesome jobs for everyone, rapidly increasing wages, lots of programs and pensions, average house price 2-3 time average yearly wage...why not have a kid?

Results? Biggest explosion in babies in our history.

I guess Canada was a dump back then?

As opposed to today where someone has to save up 20 years for a downpayment and pay off that 50,000 dollar student loan before thinking about a kid.

[Vacancyrate]

And some want that mentality to come here....why?

...because they are landlords.

[GordonH]

Last Federal election the voters of Canada had their chance to give jt a swift kick in the and send him packing.
As long as he continues to dangle the carrot of basic universal income with the leader of the ndp jt will continue to beat non-confidence votes.

[Even Steven]

Free houses for vets, awesome jobs for everyone, rapidly increasing wages, lots of programs and pensions, average house price 2-3 time average yearly wage...why not have a kid?

If it was true then the birth rate in Sweden, Norway, and other socialist heavens would be going through the roof.

They're not. They're even toying with universal income, and the quality of life there rates first on the planet - and their birth rates are about the same as here.

PS: Free houses? Did you see those houses? The tiny houses in Downtown north are smaller than a condo. You'd be the first complaining that there are not big enough, and people are squished like sardines in there lol.

[Even Steven]

And some want that mentality to come here....why?

Can you comprehend written text? That's not what I said. I said people in awful conditions and poverty are having babies no problem in third-world countries.

It's the same way everywhere in the world - the higher the quality of life, the lower the birth rates are. Hence proving that birth rates have NOTHING to do with financial wellbeing.

[Vacancyrate]

Last Federal election the voters of Canada had their chance to give jt a swift kick in the and send him packing.
As long as he continues to dangle the carrot of basic universal income with the leader of the ndp jt will continue to beat non-confidence votes.

Conservatives and NDP have exact same policy on immigration.

Flood gates open.

$$$ Import fresh FICO scores $$$

PS: Free houses? Did you see those houses? The tiny houses in Downtown north are smaller than a condo. You'd be the first complaining that there are not big enough, and people are squished like sardines in there lol.

According to you that's perfectly fine to raise a family in a condo that size (insert the you're-not-entitled-to-a-yard point here) and additionally pay about 350,000 dollars for it.

Are you suggesting that if the Canadian Government started giving out small houses on small lots at next to nothing costs to new-Canadian parents and jobs that require no high school that pay about 50/dollars hour and free daycare (or a stay at home parent one of the two) that our birth rate wouldn't rise?

I'll knock up anyone on this forum for a house with a yard for free that will one day be worth 10 million dollars when I retire.

[Vacancyrate]

Can you comprehend written text? That's not what I said. I said people in awful conditions and poverty are having babies no problem in third-world countries.

When 4/5 kids die before they are 16, 3rd world parents tend to take the shotgun approach.

Not to mention access to birth-control, religious aspects ect.

It's the same way everywhere in the world - the higher the quality of life, the lower the birth rates are.

One stat has nothing to do with the other although you are trying to bind them together.

Over the last 30 years it has gotten **much more expensive*** to live in Canada and especially have children. We didn't always bring in 350,000 people a year but now we do. The loss of the stay at home parent, education costs increases and soaring housing costs has slowed our birthrate ***even more*** than normal. When most kids are living at home until the age of 30+ it's hard to keep that birth rate up!

Hence proving that birth rates have NOTHING to do with financial well being.

You are saying that cost of living increases have no bearing on the choice to have a child.

House prices up 30% year over year in Toronto = "Lets have 3 kids! Who cares about how much a 5 bedroom house will cost!"