Greta Thunberg: teen activist the climate and eco crisis

[Rejigger]

If only Greta didn't come across as so bloody PHONY when she speaks. Whoever is paying her way should invest in acting lessons for her (oh, we all know she's not paying her own way, right?).

I'm tired of this broken record. If she would just MENTION over population of this planet, she might get my attention. But no, this gal has a single agenda. How long until her followers become frustrated over the fact that she's not doing enough to create awareness of all the factors that contribute to climate change?

Meanwhile, we continue to come out of that damned ice age that killed the dinos that gave us fossil fuels. Ironic, in'it?
And when mankind is all burned up (out of the ice age and into the fire age), how long until the earth rights itself again and future inhabitants, in whatever form them may take, are digging up our skeletons to display in museums?

I <3 Canadian Energy!

[ckil]

Greta is a brainwashed little child without a doctorate or degree from a reputable university. Why anyone would listen to her is beyond me. She exemplifies the average stupidity of the climate alarmists.

[Rejigger]

Greta is up now.

Christ! You certainly do post a lot of quotes and links related to that child. Say, you wouldn't happen to know Scorp (the OP) would you?
I suspect you're getting paid a mediocre amount for your obvious efforts, eh? Maybe I'm just jealous.

[Jlabute]

Remember, CO2 doesn't create heat energy, it traps it.

It's been a long while since I've looked at this board. Looks like you're still arguing over the same stuff, and still doing a poor job at interpreting science. Get over it guys. Climate Change is real and humans are causing it. There is no conspiracy by scientists to defraud you. They haven't missed some incredibly basic fact of climate science that you amazingly have discovered. You're wrong. Get over it and move on.

Climate Change is real and humans are causing it

Wrong and over-stated. Of course climate change is real. The question is, HOW MUCH warming is mankind responsible for. This is impossible to know. After 50 years, the IPCC tells us ECS is between 1.5 and 4.5 and their warming predictions are still double that of observations. The small amount of warming could be all natural or mostly natural and certainly way too complicated to be based on a constant values in a model. "very little research has ever been funded to search for natural mechanisms of warming…it has simply been assumed that global warming is manmade." Some scientists say CO2 is already completely saturated, and maybe insignificant compared with water vapor.

There is no conspiracy by scientists to defraud you.

Wrong.
Decades of climate peer review have been flawed and biased for the purpose of defrauding. This is well known. Of course, it is mostly politicians who fund the scientists who defraud the public of trillions of dollars for their agendas. Many scientists lie and publish results that can't be repeated. Example: global warming causes fish to behave oddly. Peer-reviewed from an obviously biased Cook University, yet 100% wrong according to groups who tried to reproduce the experiment. Debunked after 10 years. You should be thankful for skeptical scientists otherwise you'd believe all the lies.

An example of defrauding the public, here is Al Gore and Bill Nye trying to change public opinion using a presentation that relies on 'fake' thermometer results created with photoshop.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/gore-and-bi ... xperiment/

They haven't missed some incredibly basic fact of climate science

Wrong.
As an example, scientists do not know what causes the ice ages. There is a great many things scientists do not understand about climate, and a great many things that are not funded for study.

https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-war ... r-manmade/

Are you listening to the same people who believe climate change caused our BC heat-wave? Are you listening to the people who predict a catastrophic outcome? Even the IPCC says there is no emergency. What scientists do you listen to and are they sufficiently skeptical.

[ckil]

Greta is a brainwashed little child without a doctorate or degree from a reputable university. Why anyone would listen to her is beyond me. She exemplifies the average stupidity of the climate alarmists.

Seems to pretty well fit this criteria of criticism.

Of course she is. She is making a killing spewing garbage. If the money was not there, she would not be making herself look so foolish. Anyone with half a brain knows the earth has been warming for 10,000 years, except for the climate alarmists of course. But they tend not to be too bright.

[ckil]

Wrong and over-stated. Of course climate change is real. The question is, HOW MUCH warming is mankind responsible for. This is impossible to know. After 50 years, the IPCC tells us ECS is between 1.5 and 4.5 and their warming predictions are still double that of observations. The small amount of warming could be all natural or mostly natural and certainly way too complicated to be based on a constant values in a model. "very little research has ever been funded to search for natural mechanisms of warming…it has simply been assumed that global warming is manmade." Some scientists say CO2 is already completely saturated, and maybe insignificant compared with water vapor.




Wrong.
Decades of climate peer review have been flawed and biased for the purpose of defrauding. This is well known. Of course, it is mostly politicians who fund the scientists who defraud the public of trillions of dollars for their agendas. Many scientists lie and publish results that can't be repeated. Example: global warming causes fish to behave oddly. Peer-reviewed from an obviously biased Cook University, yet 100% wrong according to groups who tried to reproduce the experiment. Debunked after 10 years. You should be thankful for skeptical scientists otherwise you'd believe all the lies.

An example of defrauding the public, here is Al Gore and Bill Nye trying to change public opinion using a presentation that relies on 'fake' thermometer results created with photoshop.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/gore-and-bi ... xperiment/





Wrong.
As an example, scientists do not know what causes the ice ages. There is a great many things scientists do not understand about climate, and a great many things that are not funded for study.

https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-war ... r-manmade/

Are you listening to the same people who believe climate change caused our BC heat-wave? Are you listening to the people who predict a catastrophic outcome? Even the IPCC says there is no emergency. What scientists do you listen to and are they sufficiently skeptical.

"Greta Thunberg: ‘Nature and Physics Are Not Entertained nor Distracted by Your Theater’"

https://www.thenation.com/article/envir ... ld-summit/

The Nation publication...lol

[The Green Barbarian]

Yes, much better from Covering Climate Now.

‘Nature and Physics Are Not Entertained nor Distracted by Your Theater.… The Show Is Over’

https://coveringclimatenow.org/partner- ... w-is-over/

The show hasn't even started. What utter silliness.

[ckil]

Greta is a brainwashed little child without a doctorate or degree from a reputable university. Why anyone would listen to her is beyond me. She exemplifies the average stupidity of the climate alarmists.

Of course she is. She is making a killing spewing garbage. If the money was not there, she would not be making herself look so foolish. Anyone with half a brain knows the earth has been warming for 10,000 years, except for the climate alarmists of course. But they tend not to be too bright.

'Sticks and stones,' baby

No stick and stones. The fact is warming has occurred before humans and more importantly, before the industrial revolution. And Carbon is a necessity of life. But, again, inform us all what the perfect amount of Carbon needed to keep the earth in the tree-hugging utpoia. IF you cannot answer that then climate science is baseless.

[ckil]

Removed

Tell us what level of Carbon is needed to stop warming? Would you prefer warmth or cold?

[ckil]

As long as climate science cannot prove a level of Carbon to prevent warming, it is not a science, but a social science.

[ckil]

Removed

[ckil]

Also, before I may be accused of trying to derail this thread.

Another reminder.

Our main enemy right now . . ..

Get more climate facts.

Main enemy is physics because it proves there is nothing wrong. Physics prove that climate alarmism is a joke. Let Mother Nature take its course just like it has since earths existence. There is nothing we can do about it. To believe we can is so out in left field it is funny.

Are you going to inform us what the ultimate level of Carbon is? Why do you keep ignoring this question? Why is Carbon bad for the earth? Go and dig deep into your climate social science propaganda and see what you can dig up.

[ckil]

Removed

[Catsumi]

Anymore baiting comments will send you to queue lineup

[ckil]

Princeton Professor William Happer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExurRt2_ezM