Britain will NOT give twelve year old children the vaxxine

[Zedi]

Research conducted by the University of California has found that teenage boys are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems caused by the COVID-19 vaccine than to be hospitalized as a result of COVID-19 itself.

Wow.

“A team led by Dr Tracy Hoeg at the University of California investigated the rate of cardiac myocarditis – heart inflammation – and chest pain in children aged 12-17 following their second dose of the vaccine,” reports the Telegraph.

“They then compared this with the likelihood of children needing hospital treatment owing to Covid-19, at times of low, moderate and high rates of hospitalisation.”

“Researchers found that the risk of heart complications for boys aged 12-15 following the vaccine was 162.2 per million, which was the highest out of all the groups they looked at.”

This compares to the risk of a healthy boy being hospitalized as a result of a COVID infection, which is around 26.7 per million, meaning the risk they face from the vaccine is 6.1 times higher.

Even during high risk rates of COVID, such as in January this year, the threat posed by the vaccine is 4.3 times higher, while during low risk rates, the risk of teenage boys suffering a “cardiac adverse event” from the vaccine is a whopping 22.8 times higher.

The research data was based on a study of adverse reactions suffered by teens between January and June this year.

In a sane world, such data should represent the nail in the coffin for the argument that teenagers and children should be mandated to take the coronavirus vaccine, but it obviously won’t.

In the UK, the government is pushing to vaccinate 12-15-year-olds, even without parental consent, despite the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advising against it.

[marooned]

Just an update that the JCV now recommends and vaccination of 12-15 year olds is proceeding.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... ds-uk-work

[Silverstarqueen]

Update vaccine for 12-15 year olds is a go in the u.k.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... heme-works

[Thinktank]

- Britain has not made any such decision.

Not only did they make the decision - but Bonnie Henry might be in big trouble if she continues on the path she is going on.


UK bans vaccine for kids under 12.


Want to know why? because evidence is pouring in like a tsunami - the vaccine for children is actually a criminal thing to do.
UK government is waking up and smelling the roses - does not want to go to jail.

https://thecountersignal.com/uk-bans-va ... -under-12/

[seahawks2884]

Thank you Thinktank!
https://www.sst.dk/en/English/Corona-en ... t-COVID-19

[Silverstarqueen]

And yet, here are instructions on how to book a covid vaccine online in u.k.
"You can book these online:
1st and 2nd doses for people who are 5 years old and over

additional primary doses for people with a severely weakened immune system aged 5 years old and over

1st booster for people aged 16 years old and over, plus at-risk children aged 12 to 15 years old

a seasonal booster (autumn booster) for people aged 65 years old and over, frontline health and social care workers, those at higher risk or who are pregnant, and people who have or live with someone who has a weakened immune system"
"1st or 2nd doses
You can book a 1st or 2nd dose of the vaccine if you or your child are aged 5 years old or over.

When you can book a 2nd dose
You should be able to book a 2nd dose on the day after your 1st dose. If you or your child are:

18 years old or over - you'll be offered 2nd dose appointments from 8 weeks (56 days) after your 1st dose
under 18 years old - you'll be offered 2nd dose appointments from 12 weeks (84 days) after your 1st dose.
How to get an earlier 2nd dose if you're under 18 years old and at-risk
If you or your child are under 18 years old and at high risk from COVID-19, you're eligible for a 2nd dose from 8 weeks after your 1st dose.
However, this service will only offer you appointments from 12 weeks after your 1st dose.

To get your 2nd dose from 8 weeks, please either:

contact your GP surgery
go to a walk-in site with a letter from a GP that says you're eligible for a 2nd dose from 8 weeks after your 1st dose
Advice for children aged 5 to 15 years old and their parents or guardians
A set of resources are available on GOV.UK in a variety of languages, Braille and Easy Read.
These resources are to help children, young people and their parents or guardians make a decision about whether to get vaccinated:

GOV.UK: COVID-19 vaccination resources for children aged 5 to 11 years old
GOV.UK: COVID-19 vaccination resources for children and young people aged 12 to 17 years old
Consent to treatment is an important part of the process and staff at the vaccination site will ask for consent before giving the vaccine."

When the updated hybrid boosters become available, different age/risk groups will get priority no doubt, same as in Canada.

[Silverstarqueen]

Claims that Dr. Henry did not discuss natural or "herd(natural and vaccine) immunity" early on are not true. This from Jan 2021. It was not known earlier, just how long "natural" immunity lasted or how effective it was, since even in China doctors said ( in summer of 2020)that patients could be reinfected with covid a second time.
https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2021/01/0 ... y-covid19/

[hozzle]

Claims that Dr. Henry did not discuss natural or "herd(natural and vaccine) immunity" early on are not true. This from Jan 2021. It was not known earlier, just how long "natural" immunity lasted or how effective it was, since even in China doctors said ( in summer of 2020)that patients could be reinfected with covid a second time.
https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2021/01/0 ... y-covid19/

Yup... and the vaxxed are reinfected repeatedly to the new normal of 44% of hospital vid patients that are vaxxed... lol

[Thinktank]

Yup... and the vaxxed are reinfected repeatedly to the new normal of 44% of hospital vid patients that are vaxxed... lol

Dr Campbell can't be totally trusted. If 54% of hospital patients are unvaxxed - the vaccine is wonderful.

They're lying. 90% of hospital patients are vaxxed.

[BigDaddyIsHere]

With that statement. Your talking like the shot stops transmission. Reminder, it doesn’t!

If two people (or several) are vaccinated there is less chance of transmission than if one or neither of them is vaccinated.

This is absolutely a false statement…. Misinformation and Disinformation!

There are so many variables and you have to factor in natural immunity, recent infections, how long it was since you received your last vaccination, new variants, viral loads, environment, exposure, etc….

Getting a vaccine doesn’t necessary mean you are less infectious. Understand?

[Silverstarqueen]

If two people (or several) are vaccinated there is less chance of transmission than if one or neither of them is vaccinated.

This is absolutely a false statement…. Misinformation and Disinformation!

There are so many variables and you have to factor in natural immunity, recent infections, how long it was since you received your last vaccination, new variants, viral loads, environment, exposure, etc….

Getting a vaccine doesn’t necessary mean you are less infectious. Understand?

My brief summation of review of studies done regarding viral loads, transmissions among health care workers, at about that time was accurate. If you would like to post results from some other studies that cover all the additional variables you have mentioned, I'd love to read them. Understand?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287551/

[BigDaddyIsHere]

This is absolutely a false statement…. Misinformation and Disinformation!

There are so many variables and you have to factor in natural immunity, recent infections, how long it was since you received your last vaccination, new variants, viral loads, environment, exposure, etc….

Getting a vaccine doesn’t necessary mean you are less infectious. Understand?

My brief summation of review of studies done regarding viral loads, transmissions among health care workers, at about that time was accurate. If you would like to post results from some other studies that cover all the additional variables you have mentioned, I'd love to read them. Understand?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287551/

This study is from July 2021. I stopped reading there….

Very outdated considering we now know over the past year that this vaccine practically does nothing beneficial and potentially more risks to the majority of the population….

Keep posting your studies that keep changing by the month though if that makes you feel smarter. Remember science is evolving and so is the vaccination propaganda from Big Pharma.

[Zedi]

This is absolutely a false statement…. Misinformation and Disinformation!

There are so many variables and you have to factor in natural immunity, recent infections, how long it was since you received your last vaccination, new variants, viral loads, environment, exposure, etc….

Getting a vaccine doesn’t necessary mean you are less infectious. Understand?

My brief summation of review of studies done regarding viral loads, transmissions among health care workers, at about that time was accurate. If you would like to post results from some other studies that cover all the additional variables you have mentioned, I'd love to read them. Understand?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287551/

Real world testimonials show that whether you are vaxxed or not, you can still transmit and be infected by the virus and have varying outcomes of more or less disease from the virus. Ive seen unvaxed and vaxed get hit hard with covid and vice versa.

The non captured infectious disease experts all say human biology plays the biggest factor in the severity of a covid infection, not vaccination status.

[Silverstarqueen]

My brief summation of review of studies done regarding viral loads, transmissions among health care workers, at about that time was accurate. If you would like to post results from some other studies that cover all the additional variables you have mentioned, I'd love to read them. Understand?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287551/

This study is from July 2021. I stopped reading there….

Very outdated considering we now know over the past year that this vaccine practically does nothing beneficial and potentially more risks to the majority of the population….

Keep posting your studies that keep changing by the month though if that makes you feel smarter. Remember science is evolving and so is the vaccination propaganda from Big Pharma.

The comment of mine that you quoted was from Sept 2021. When would you expect the study to be done then?
Now you complain "This is absolutely a false statement…. Misinformation and Disinformation!" and "Very outdated"
Then why quote a comment from 12 months ago, and expect my commnet, based on the study, to be accurate with all the new variables, which you mentioned? The study done at that time, shows the efficacy of the vaccine at that time and my comment was accurate at that time.
Why not post your new studies based on all the variables you mentioned, new variant, new vaccine, population that has had immunity developing since boosters and 12 more months of circulating repeated infections? Vaccinated people have had just as much time to be exposed and develop "natural immunity" as have Unvaccinated, but we also have the benefit of the boosts to immunity from the shots in addition. Soon we will get another boost to immunity as the hybrid vaccines roll out. While anti-vaxxers were screaming "What about breakthru infections!!!", vaccinated people were protected from hospitalization and severe outcomes, and getting "natural immunity" too!

[BigDaddyIsHere]

This study is from July 2021. I stopped reading there….

Very outdated considering we now know over the past year that this vaccine practically does nothing beneficial and potentially more risks to the majority of the population….

Keep posting your studies that keep changing by the month though if that makes you feel smarter. Remember science is evolving and so is the vaccination propaganda from Big Pharma.

The comment of mine that you quoted was from Sept 2021. When would you expect the study to be done then?
Now you complain "This is absolutely a false statement…. Misinformation and Disinformation!" and "Very outdated"
Then why quote a comment from 12 months ago, and expect my commnet, based on the study, to be accurate with all the new variables, which you mentioned? The study done at that time, shows the efficacy of the vaccine at that time and my comment was accurate at that time.
Why not post your new studies based on all the variables you mentioned, new variant, new vaccine, population that has had immunity developing since boosters and 12 more months of circulating repeated infections? Vaccinated people have had just as much time to be exposed and develop "natural immunity" as have Unvaccinated, but we also have the benefit of the boosts to immunity from the shots in addition. Soon we will get another boost to immunity as the hybrid vaccines roll out. While anti-vaxxers were screaming "What about breakthru infections!!!", vaccinated people were protected from hospitalization and severe outcomes, and getting "natural immunity" too!

Yes I now realize your quote was a year old… but it must be comical looking back at it and seeing how misguided this study was now that we know so much more.