Pierre!

[rustled]

What else was included in the bill. That's the big question. How can someone responsibly vote yes on a bill when there are bad things hidden within it.

And unless Poilievre's his dad went public to tell us he was sitting there "heartbroken", anyone telling us he was sitting there "heartbroken" is very clearly spinning their own dishonest and self-serving narrative.

[George Orwell 1984]

What misquote?

>insert eye roll<
"yet he still chose to vote against gay marriage".

It's been explained to you.

Again and again and again

[VaxisSafe]

>insert eye roll<
"yet he still chose to vote against gay marriage".

It's been explained to you.

Again and again and again

Sweeping his political decision (which negatively impacts minorities for years and years ) under the rug and proclaiming “nothing to see here” isn’t an explanation imo. It’s an excusal of bigotry

[George Orwell 1984]

I replied to you numerous times with the quote from CBC yet you choose to ignore it . It was pointed out that it could be repeated 20 times and it would still not be driven in to thick liberal skulls. Here we are AGAIN.
Good grief !

[VaxisSafe]

I replied to you numerous times with the quote from CBC yet you choose to ignore it . It was pointed out that it could be repeated 20 times and it would still not be driven in to thick liberal skulls. Here we are AGAIN.
Good grief !

The quote isn’t applicable when his actions have unequivocally proven to contradict the quote. Ie - voted against gay marriage. Ie - refused to attend a Pride flag rising. Ie - taking selfies with people promoting anti-lgbtq groups

A vote for Pierre is a vote for a dangerous pet don trying to destroy Canadian values

[Gone_Fishin]

Sweeping his political decision (which negatively impacts minorities for years and years ) under the rug and proclaiming “nothing to see here” isn’t an explanation imo. It’s an excusal of bigotry

Pollievre said that for LGBTQ people, this includes "the freedom to marry, start a family, raise kids, freedom from bigotry and bashing, freedom to be judged by personal character, not by group identity, freedom to start a life and be judged on your merit."

removed.

[69cutlass]

Again and again and again

Sweeping his political decision (which negatively impacts minorities for years and years ) under the rug and proclaiming “nothing to see here” isn’t an explanation imo. It’s an excusal of bigotry

The only bigot is the one attacking him because of their own personal beliefs

[Catsumi]

I replied to you numerous times with the quote from CBC yet you choose to ignore it . It was pointed out that it could be repeated 20 times and it would still not be driven in to thick liberal skulls. Here we are AGAIN.
Good grief !

See, I did tell you it’d take at least 20. Where are we at now?

[George Orwell 1984]

I replied to you numerous times with the quote from CBC yet you choose to ignore it . It was pointed out that it could be repeated 20 times and it would still not be driven in to thick liberal skulls. Here we are AGAIN.
Good grief !

The quote isn’t applicable when his actions have unequivocally proven to contradict the quote. Ie - voted against gay marriage. Ie - refused to attend a Pride flag rising. Ie - taking selfies with people promoting anti-lgbtq groups

A vote for Pierre is a vote for a dangerous pet don trying to destroy Canadian values

Unequivocally proven NOTHING ,he hasn’t promoted anything anti . Give it a rest

[Babba_not_Gump]

Not up to the minute shorthand. What is IDU?

I don’t understand? IDU?

International Democrat Union

It's a cabal of right wing parties around the world who's basically stated goal is to interfere in countries sovereignty to try to install right wing governments.

A few notible members: Magas, belarus, Russia, right wing German parties (which is INSANE).....oh and the conservative party of Canada.

Want to take a guess who the chairman is?

None other than a Mr. Stephan Harper.

So the other poster who said PeePee is nothing than a Harper puppet, they were absolutely correct.

You mention the International Democrat Union of which Stephen Harper is the chairman and supposedly the mentor of Pierre Poilievre, there are members from all over the world, many more than those you mention, but here, to ease your concerns about what direction Poilievre and the Conservative part may be heading, is a link to their principles.
https://www.idu.org/about/principles-statutes/

And please note this principle,
"Having regard to the threats posed by the extreme Left and the extreme Right";
Pretty good principle for Poilievre to be following don't you think.

[moarcowbell]

Current polling now shows Poilievre poised to form majority government.
Change is-a-comin'.

When these numbers are plugged into a riding-by-riding projection of seat counts, they show a solid chance of a Conservative victory in the next federal election, if not an outright majority.

The latest seat projections by the polling website 338Canada have the Conservatives capturing 165 seats against just 115 for the Liberals.

While 165 is still five seats short of the 170 needed to form a majority, a 165-seat caucus would still be large enough to defeat any new attempts at a Liberal-NDP coalition. With the NDP only expected to capture 22 seats, a combined Liberal-NDP caucus would come to just 137.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/s ... 6eed&ei=10

[The Green Barbarian]

Surging support for Conservatives now has Poilievre in sight of a majority

After years of maintaining a consistent but mediocre lead over the Liberals, this summer has suddenly yielded a string of polls showing that the Conservative party could be on track for a commanding majority in the next federal election.

Recent polls from Leger, Nanos and Abacus Data show the Conservatives with a nearly double-digit lead over the Liberals. A July Leger poll , for instance, had 37 per cent of respondents backing the Tories against 28 per cent supporting the Liberals.

When these numbers are plugged into a riding-by-riding projection of seat counts, they show a solid chance of a Conservative victory in the next federal election, if not an outright majority.

The latest seat projections by the polling website 338Canada have the Conservatives capturing 165 seats against just 115 for the Liberals.

While 165 is still five seats short of the 170 needed to form a majority, a 165-seat caucus would still be large enough to defeat any new attempts at a Liberal-NDP coalition. With the NDP only expected to capture 22 seats, a combined Liberal-NDP caucus would come to just 137.
If Conservative fortunes continue to improve, they could well be on course for a record-breaking triumph by October 2025, the absolute latest a federal election could be called.

Although, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is still falling well short of the numbers that were showing themselves the last time the Tories stood on the eve of a blowout landslide.
'
In 1983, just after Brian Mulroney took the helm of the Progressive Conservatives, his party boasted an incredible 55 per cent share of voter support against 27 per cent for the Liberals, which were then still led by Pierre Trudeau. A year later, these poll numbers manifested in Mulroney capturing what is still one of the biggest landslides in Canadian history, with Mulroney winning 211 seats to the Liberals’ 40.

The Conservatives have been besting the Liberals in the popular vote intention for a significant portion of Justin Trudeau’s tenure as prime minister.

As early as the spring of 2018 — just two-and-a-half years after Trudeau’s swearing-in — polls began to regularly show Canadians favouring the Conservatives over the Liberals.

In March 2018, in the wake of Trudeau’s much-criticized official visit to India, an Angus Reid Institute survey found that 40 per cent of respondents wanted a Conservative government, against just 31 per cent who wanted to stick with a Liberal one.

“If an election were held tomorrow, the CPC — led by Andrew Scheer, would be in range to form a majority government,” they wrote at the time.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/s ... 7f299&ei=7

[d0nb]

That’s how “they” get you. In the light, Stevie H. seems like a regular Canadian hockey dad, but in the shadows, he’s a Machiavellian puppet master, a real-life Lord Voldemort, and the mastermind behind his own loss to Justin T., arguably the worst PM in Canadian history. Harper is also suspected as having been instrumental in planning the incoherent campaigns of his successors, Andrew Scheer and Erin O’Toole.

Poilievre must be warned. Harper is evil, sheer evil.

Must be warned? He's his minion.

You can't be serious. If Poilievre has a mentor, it's his long-time friend, John Baird, not Harper.

PeePee supporters are constantly talking about the WEF and Soros and whatever other nonsense they can find, but the IDU is the worst of them all.....absolutely terrifying organization.

The IDU appears to be a rather innocuous group of center-right politicians. One would have to be pretty far left to feel threatened by an organization with a leader as benign as Stephen Harper.

[d0nb]

>insert eye roll<
"yet he still chose to vote against gay marriage".

It's been explained to you.

No it actually hasn’t. Pierre’s gay dad was expecting his son to vote in favour of gay marriage. Pierre refused while his dad looked on in the HOC heartbroken

That’s a real tearjerker, and quite popular with Poilievre haters, but what real evidence do you have that Donald Poilievre was present for the vote, that he "expected" Pierre to vote for the measure or that he wouldn’t have been perfectly happy with a legal union that didn’t happen to be called “marriage?”

Pierre isn’t a compassionate person who cares about his family let alone the average Canadian. No sensible person should be voting for this guy

And with that, the "science is settled."

[Gone_Fishin]

Trudeau thinks the worst problem in Canada is that people are angry at him.