Climate Change Mega Thread

[Old Sailor]

Just washed the car. Sorry folks but its going to snow....

Me too cause it was filthy! Nothing worse than a dirty white car.

[kiabird]

Scientists discovered dead white pines at very high altitude under the glaciers... well white pines don't grow that high unless the temperatures are much higher than current temps,

And a huge fossil palm tree leaf was found in Alaska in 1978.
https://www.gi.alaska.edu/alaska-scienc ... ils-alaska

[nepal]

.
Cool!! Nine-inches of snow in Florida Jan-2025

How does this fit into global warming? How do cold-killed Okanagan grape vines and fruit trees, that have been there for decades, fit into ‘global warming’?

https://www.thetravel.com/its-snowing-i ... -snowfall/

[The Green Barbarian]

.
Cool!! Nine-inches of snow in Florida Jan-2025

How does this fit into global warming? How do cold-killed Okanagan grape vines and fruit trees, that have been there for decades, fit into ‘global warming’?

https://www.thetravel.com/its-snowing-i ... -snowfall/

no problem, they got you covered bro - you know it doesn't matter, hot or cold, it's always because of CO2. And you better just suspend logic and reason and just believe while handing over your wallet to the climate oligarchs and the oppressive governments still pushing this fraud.

[Jlabute]

The medieval warm period was undeniably pronounced as new studies show. Adding to the mountain of evidence that medieval warming was from natural mechanisms despite the low levels of CO2 in the 700AD to 1300AD period. This is an issue for climate models since they rely almost solely on CO2 levels.

All analyzed quantitative reconstructions indicate that the Medieval Warm Period in Poland was comparable or even warmer than the average temperature in the period 1951-2000.

https://notrickszone.com/2025/03/09/med ... dies-show/

[Jlabute]

Coral science corrupted and measurement methodologies changed that give erroneous results.
Very interesting.

[rustled]

Coral science corrupted and measurement methodologies changed that give erroneous results.
Very interesting.

That's how to turn an event into a "useful" crisis, AND how to stop funding researchers to do objective science and fund them to do politically-motivated science instead.

[JLives]

Coral science corrupted and measurement methodologies changed that give erroneous results.
Very interesting.

Do you have a scientific link? YouTube can claim whatever people want it to.

[Fanboy]

Coral science corrupted and measurement methodologies changed that give erroneous results.
Very interesting.

Do you have a scientific link? YouTube can claim whatever people want it to.

Yes yes, because it was posted on YouTube it can't be true, unless it's posted on YouTube and supports the narrative you like.
Dr Peter Ridd: "Ridd received a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from James Cook University in 1978, and later a PhD in Physics from that same institution in 1980.[6] At this time, he also joined the Australian Institute of Marine Science. He started studying the Great Barrier Reef in 1984, mainly focusing on ocean currents and the movement of sediment"

Ya, let's not listen to someone who has studies the reefs since 1984 when we are talking about the reef.

How about this, debate what he says.

[LovemyBolt]

Yes yes, because it was posted on YouTube it can't be true, unless it's posted on YouTube and supports the narrative you like.
Dr Peter Ridd: "Ridd received a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from James Cook University in 1978, and later a PhD in Physics from that same institution in 1980.[6] At this time, he also joined the Australian Institute of Marine Science. He started studying the Great Barrier Reef in 1984, mainly focusing on ocean currents and the movement of sediment"

Ya, let's not listen to someone who has studies the reefs since 1984 when we are talking about the reef.

How about this, debate what he says.

Well you found a direct quote from Wikipedia. Did you read everything else on him there? It sounds like he's been rather discredited.
And it was an opinion piece, not a rigorous scientific paper.

[JLives]

Do you have a scientific link? YouTube can claim whatever people want it to.

Yes yes, because it was posted on YouTube it can't be true, unless it's posted on YouTube and supports the narrative you like.
Dr Peter Ridd: "Ridd received a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from James Cook University in 1978, and later a PhD in Physics from that same institution in 1980.[6] At this time, he also joined the Australian Institute of Marine Science. He started studying the Great Barrier Reef in 1984, mainly focusing on ocean currents and the movement of sediment"

Ya, let's not listen to someone who has studies the reefs since 1984 when we are talking about the reef.

How about this, debate what he says.

I too can type whatever I want and hit post. Do you have anything concrete to back up what you're saying is my question? I don't debate climate science because I'm not qualified to. I leave it to the experts who study it.

[Jlabute]

Do you have a scientific link? YouTube can claim whatever people want it to.

I'm sorry, you want a link about what? Something tells me you (and your new follower) never watched the video. What are you asking for?

[featfan]

https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/19 ... 2926245151
How brain dead can a person be?
Very, if you are Laurel Collins MP from Victoria.
My Lord, send the comet now.

[Fanboy]

Yes yes, because it was posted on YouTube it can't be true, unless it's posted on YouTube and supports the narrative you like.
Dr Peter Ridd: "Ridd received a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from James Cook University in 1978, and later a PhD in Physics from that same institution in 1980.[6] At this time, he also joined the Australian Institute of Marine Science. He started studying the Great Barrier Reef in 1984, mainly focusing on ocean currents and the movement of sediment"

Ya, let's not listen to someone who has studies the reefs since 1984 when we are talking about the reef.

How about this, debate what he says.

Well you found a direct quote from Wikipedia. Did you read everything else on him there? It sounds like he's been rather discredited.
And it was an opinion piece, not a rigorous scientific paper.

Discredited by those that get funding and make money of climate change? Again, lots of scientific info was stated, go ahead and debunk some of it.

[LovemyBolt]

Discredited by those that get funding and make money of climate change? Again, lots of scientific info was stated, go ahead and debunk some of it.

lol Sure, why not. Whatever. It doesn't matter. He seems to be some old crank has-been who has been discredited. It was an opinion piece anyway. Not a scientific paper.
Gonna tell us that "scientists" paid by the oil industry aren't making money to make up their "science"?